Cain is a piece of shit

[Tank]

If Herman was a Democrat, this story would have a whole different spin to it.

 

[bodecea]

If Herman was a Democrat, this story would have a whole different spin to it.

You able to prove that?

 

[paulitician]

Uh,Romper Room?? No? Ok,Obama is a piece of shit. Now Romper Room?

 

[Tank]

If Herman was a Democrat, this story would have a whole different spin to it.

You able to prove that?

Obama

 

[frazzledgear]

imo, and yes, he's also a whiner.

Good riddance to bad garbage.

I predicted this months ago.

I get it. You prefer a smooth, oily professional politician who knows how to do a masterful job lying to the public while using campaign funds to support his mistress, cheating on his dying wife and has a child out of wedlock -all while lying to the nation with a straight face and that "sincere" look he perfected and fully expecting to be elected to VP anyway (Edwards) or an even sleazier professional politician accused of nonstop extramarital affairs even after being elected President, had Arkansas state patrolmen accusing him as governor of using the highway patrol as his pimps to procure women for him, who knew how to convincingly wag that finger at the nation while denying ANY sexual relationship with that woman, and ended up being proven to be a serial sexual predator after one of his own staff members and campaign workers after another came forward accusing him of sexually assaulting them, after a federal judge ruled he had committed felony perjury in order to get a lawsuit settled in his favor. NO problem there though. As long as they have that "D" after their name, there is pretty much nothing that makes them pieces of shit in your eyes -because those guys are the "good' guys, right? ROFL

But someone who is not a career politician, someone who has never been confronted with dirty Chicago-style politics (and lets get real, all evidence points back to Obama operatives who did this to him -they also did the exact same thing to MULTIPLE opponents of Obama's in this IDENTICAL tactic because he chose who he would and would not allow to remain on the ballot. In fact I think he is actively trying to manipulate things to get the Republican nominee he wants to face), where the accusations were carefully timed to roll out with increasing seriousness as soon as the media frenzy died down because there was never a shred of evidence for any of the accusations. The tactic is the same one used in Chicago -it isn't whether the accusations are true or not that did in any of Obama's opponents he forced to quit the race -and in fact typically there was nothing more than just the accusation itself and no proof it was true at all. It was the sheer number of accusations that continued without evidence but still increased in severity until the person had enough and just quit. Even seasoned politicians couldn't fight that one (which was even attempted on McCain too but they couldn't find women to go along and finally gave up) but someone who was not a career politician and whose family was truly unprepared for the filth that was going to come the MINUTE he surged in the polls? Isn't it interesting they didn't start when he announced his candidacy -if it happened to me, that is when I would have come forward to let people know right off the bat this person is morally unfit. But no one was concerned about Cain's chances until he surged past Romney and THAT caused a real problem.

Come on -no accusations UNTIL he was ahead of Romney and the first were mild and even silly by a woman who took the minimal offer made by the company to go away because it was cheaper than going to court even if they won (compared to the $850,000 Clinton ended up paying Paula Jones). He didn't quit after getting a warning of what was to come -so once the media frenzy started to die down again, the new accusations ramped up. Made by an Obama staffer no less -who very, very interestingly could never bring herself to say OUT LOUD exactly what it was Cain was supposed to have done. She apparently believed that simply being female meant she was telling the truth -even though she has a history of filing sexual harassment claims -after all that is a known way to make easy money. But she is suddenly so RIGHTEOUS and even though she just can't say out loud what the AWFUL thing he is supposed to have said and she couldn't bring herself to come forward BEFORE this, suddenly with the help of that true piece of shit Allred, she wants to do a gang bang on Cain with other women to jointly accuse him. Curiously that just never happened. Apparently none of these women wanted THEIR accusations put under the microscope after all and they just disappeared into the woodwork like the cockroaches they are. Compare that to the women who accused Clinton -they NEVER went away. THAT is the difference between legitimate accusations and bullshit. That still wasn't enough to get Cain to quit either, the media frenzy died down again and that son of a bitch was still in the race and his backers still hadn't gone running for the hills. So out comes the woman claiming he groped her in a car. Now we have moved WAY beyond silly accusations about holding his hand up to indicate the height of his wife and moved straight into sexual assault. And its from a woman with such a well known bad reputation for lying that CBS anchor Bill Curtis said he didn't believe her and CBS outright refused to run with the story because she used to work for CBS and they knew firsthand this woman was not credible. (Neither did anyone else which is why she disappeared too). Media frenzy dies down AGAIN and Cain still is among the top three! DAMN! This CANNOT be tolerated! So a woman he knows waits until she can rack up 70 texts in a few weeks, nearly all of which SHE initiated asking Cain for money. Not one word in any of those texts about any improper relationship, not a word about pining for him, the "love" they supposedly shared, -just another hanger-on asking for money. And again -very interesting timing! In fact, the timing on all this has now become OBVIOUS! She doesn't feel the need to come forward until AFTER the media frenzy dies down yet again -which also gave her time to rack up the texts after not being in contact with the man for sometime since they don't go back any further than a few weeks. And this time it is with a claim that he had a long term sexual affair with her for THIRTEEN YEARS. Yet the only "evidence" she has are those 70 texts she made to him a few weeks before coming forward -where not one text was sexual in nature, never even hinted at a close relationship and just trying to hit him up for money again. THAT smells like a deliberate set-up BIG TIME. She needed time to set the trap -the fact he answered a few of those texts is being used against him even and she kept texting him until he did answer. But just imagine the field day she would have had if he had actually given her the money! LOL

My, but a cynic would say the real purpose of racking up all those texts was for no reason but setting a deliberate trap and she needed SOMETHING to be able to hold out as "evidence" to support her claim of a LONG TERM AFFAIR. It would have been better if he had given her money, but she wasn't able to get him to do it and had to settle for the 70 texts, 80% of which SHE wrote and none that remotely sounded affectionate or romantic. Indeed, in one he demands to know what she is doing to find a job. My God even Gennifer Flowers had raunchy messages left on her answering machine to back up her claim of an affair with Clinton that lasted a fraction of that time! As Cain's attorney pointed out, this woman is claiming he flew her all over the country for illicit sex romps -so where are the records showing her flights, where are the hotel records? Airlines and hotels archive their records -so they should be there. If it happened. She can't afford to produce phony ones and just pick any date -the man has a verifiable record of where he was during that time too. So......no airline and hotel records to back up any claim about their wild travels to have sex after all. His attorney is STILL demanding copies of her phone records -and she refuses. Why would she refuse? IF she is telling the truth about the many hours they talked and texted and just ...LOVED. But all she has are 70 texts nearly all of which are ones SHE made in the last few weeks. I guarantee if I had been having an affair with a married person for 13 years, there are going to be at least a couple of people who know about it -not one person came forward to support a single word this woman said. In other words -this is one more person who can't prove her claim but she is the one who should have had the most evidence to back it up! Just like the rest she expects to have her story taken at face value. Are you seriously going to suggest if a WOMAN makes an accusation of sexual misconduct against a man, that is proof enough for you? Really? Do you really need to compare that to the media frenzy intent on TRASHING and DESTROYING the women who accused their hero Clinton? Even with evidence to back it up, the media believed their job was to go after anyone who threatened a DEMOCRAT. The media was complicit in keeping the public from knowing Edwards was cheating on his dying wife and had gotten his mistress pregnant until it couldn't be hidden anymore! The double standard is nauseating.

In the end it just didn't matter -Cain was killed by the sheer number and the fact none of these women could prove any of their claims was irrelevant. THAT is the kind of filthy politics Cain and his family were never prepared for and never got a handle how to properly combat them.

Oh sure, the only REAL person in the group of professional politicians -but HE is the piece of shit here Ravi. (That tells me quite a bit about your own character actually.) I got it. But I bet you didn't even hold your nose before voting for the REAL pieces of shit like that total scumbag criminal Edwards who looked the public straight in the eye and lied through his teeth about his affair while his wife was sick and lied through his teeth that he used campaign funds to support her. I bet you had NO problem voting for that criminal scumbag sexual predator Clinton either. THAT is no doubt really, really different in your mind. Probably something you ADMIRE like so many other Democrats.

Because THEY were career politicians and lied with EASE, with their usual oiliness, used their career politician wives and phony families as props while they lied -and that made it acceptable to you. Its the real person confronted with dirty politics and the use of amorphous, vague, unspoken accusations that were carefully crafted for both the timing and the seriousness of the accusations -yet still without a shred of evidence for any. And THAT is the person you find to be a piece of shit. Gee, if he only had "D" after his name -lol.

I too made a prediction when the Obama staffer claimed sexual harassment but oddly could never bring herself to describe exactly what it was he was supposedly to have done and the gang bang on Cain she wanted to do with other women and that real piece of shit Allred just.........went away. I said then the accusations would not only continue BUT would increase in severity UNTIL HE QUIT -but they wouldn't have any more credibility either and it was the sheer number that would do him in spite of the fact none of them considered individually amounted to jackshit and couldn't be backed up. MY prediction is better than yours -because HERE is the real clue the entire thing was a well crafted political tactic to get this man out of the race. The most serious accusations do NOT come last-unless you might be facing Obama. For everyone else when they are true -they come out right off the bat or very quickly after the first. They are NOT strung out like this for maximum media exposure, wait until the feeding frenzy dies then trot out the next one, increasing in severity each time. (And yes, for a Baptist minister to have had a 13 year affair would be considered the most serious of all these accusations.)

And here is another prediction -there won't be any more accusations of sexual misconduct. Because this is MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. Which totally begs the question about who really believes a candidate waits until they have all come forward and THEN quits. Oh sure. Interestingly, this is the IDENTICAL pattern again in Chicago against Obama opponents. After the nonstop accusations of sexual misconduct that were carefully timed to exploit media attention and in severity - they mysteriously all disappeared once his opponent quit. Obama has an odds defying record for the number of his opponents felled by nonstop accusations of sexual misconduct FAR beyond that of politicians in the game for decades. Seriously. He did NOT want to chance this being an historic race of two black men running for President -even if he believed he could beat him, it would force an uncomfortable change in his campaign strategy and eliminate the ability of him to use the race card for any audience that might be receptive to it.

There are some real pieces of shit in this story -but it isn't the guy who didn't have a clue what it meant to play with the big boys from Chicago and was naive enough to believe it was all about who had the best ideas.

 

[paulitician]

Pretty hard to fathom how so many could actually thank this OP for expressing such irrational hate. All that hate for someone they don't even know. All because he has the letter 'R' in front of his name rather than a 'D.' This is unfortunately what politics can do to some of our people. It strips some of their humanity. Herman Cain made some mistakes but that's no reason to call the man a "piece of shit." He is a human being. We've all made mistakes ourselves. But would we like others to call us "pieces of shit?" People really should think aboout what Politics is doing to them. Maybe some should take a break from it for a bit. Take some time to regain their humanity. The 'D' & 'R' thing really isn't the only thing that matters in life. Be decent. Just be decent.

 

[BOBO]

Ravi baby, tell ole BOBO that ya wouldn't want ole lover boy Cain in the sack with ya for an evening of sheer orgasmic delight! Hell, ole Herman might even bring ya a free pizza & large soft drink to boot just to show ya how much your worth to him!

 

[Chris]

Watching Cain standing on that stage today lying through his teeth in front of his wife was remarkable.

Ladies and gentlemen, here's the women I cheated on!

 

[Tank]

It will be pretty damm hard to find a black man that hasn't cheated on his wife

 

[paulitician]

Watching Cain standing on that stage today lying through his teeth in front of his wife was remarkable.

Ladies and gentlemen, here's the women I cheated on!

Somehow i doubt you're really so outraged over that. You're just kicking a man when he's down. The man has ended his run for President. Isn't that enough for you? Do you really care what goes on between him and his wife or are you just feigning outrage like many others on this thread? The man made some mistakes. Let it go.

 

[frazzledgear]

That's odd. It's a common claim among the left that Clinton was convicted for his affair.

Do you ask them for the dates of his conviction for the affair?

Really? You might want to check with Stephanie to see if she is on the left because she is the only one here making that claim.

As for myself. I'm informed enough to know it was all about perjury.

But I'm sure Steph is happy to have you come and call her a Leftie anyways.

Pretending this thread is the entirety of reality is disingenuous.

Quite the Kool-Aid drinker as well as trying to totally re-write history.

In case you REALLY didn't know it, Clinton was impeached for committing felony perjury in order to get a lawsuit settled in his favor. The commission of a felony falls under the "high crimes" since all felonies are considered to be "high crimes". A "high crime" does NOT mean "the most serious" -it means those offenses found to be unacceptable in an elected official. Hard to argue (unless you are a liberal of course) that anyone thinks its fine and dandy for ANY elected official to commit felony perjury in order to get lawsuits settled in their favor and thereby manipulate our justice system for their own personal gain -much less fine and dandy for a sitting President to do it. This is the same offense for which Clinton was also permanently disbarred by the Supreme Court from ever arguing a case in front of the court for life, the same offense for which he was disbarred by the state of Arkansas for five years. This was not treated like the big joke the left still likes to pretend it was. Not a single one even mentioned him getting a blow job -but they all sure as hell mentioned the fact a federal judge made a ruling from the bench that Clinton had committed felony perjury! That is a CONVICTION that is no different from being found guilty of the same crime in a criminal proceeding. It only required the filing of criminal charges to sentence him -which wasn't done for political reasons only. He has OFFICIALLY been convicted of felony perjury by a judge and for political reasons escaped any sentence for it. It is an appeal-able conviction no different from being convicted of any other felony. He chose NOT to appeal it, did not want to testify truthfully, could see what the likely outcome of the case was going to be and the likely amount he would be ordered to pay and chose instead to pay Jones $850,000! What does that tell you? The decision not to go ahead with the criminal proceedings in order to sentence him after he left office (that part could not be done while still in office but could only be done once out) was made for no reason but WHO HE WAS. So much for that illusion about being "equal under the law".

The fact a judge ruled he had committed felony perjury is ALSO why the Supreme Court disbarred him for life. Or are you also going to pretend the Supreme Court did it because he got a blow job? He has the nifty "honor" of being the only former President in history to be disbarred by the Supreme Court! It is also why he was disbarred by Arkansas -it is the same as being a convicted FELON which is automatic disbarment. Or are you going to say his own home state of Arkansas disbarred him for getting a blow job too? Just because the crime involves his sexual predatory nature (which is legendary and not always consensual) does NOT make it a joke just because you want to pretend otherwise. A federal judge ruled he had committed a FELONY. One that cost him more than 3/4 of a million dollars, his law license and permanent disbarment from practicing law before the Supreme Court. (He was also charged by the House of Representatives of having committed perjury to a federal grand jury -which we all know he did as well.) But the felony perjury ruling by a federal judge is THE seminal event that led to his impeachment, without which it would never have happened.

The idea that Presidents get to manipulate our justice system for their own personal gain and we all should just *wink-wink* and snigger about it -is definitely a LIBERAL thing.

Except I'm absolutely positive if Clinton had done everything just the same way but had an "R" after his name instead of a "D", a big light would suddenly come on for the morally bankrupt liberals -and they would suddenly not find it just a joke after all that a President tried to manipulate our justice system for his own personal gain. That letter counts most to liberals -and that letter is in reality the source of their "ethics and morals". (I say with a *wink-wink* and a snigger of course.) Until then, keep playing stupid about what the guy REALLY did to get impeached. But remember, stupid won't be writing the final chapter on this. That won't be done until all those with a political stake in how it is written -are dead. In reality Clinton is a scumbag Democrat crook and serial sexual predator.


And PULLEEZE -no problem with a President committing felonies, but only the left would believe it an impeachable offense for a sitting Supreme Court justice to speak about the justice process to groups of Americans if those people are anything short of raging liberals? Or those sponsored by any person THEY have deemed to be their own political enemy of course. You do realize all the justices, some more than others, have spoken to all sorts of groups around the country about how our justice system works, right? You must think something NEFARIOUS and UNDERHANDED is going on if a justice talks to............GASP.........a conservative group? REALLY? Impeach 'em, huh?

You do realize Supreme Court justices can only be impeached for the identical impeachable offenses that apply to Presidents, right? So exactly where in that list of impeachable offenses do you find TALKING about how our justice system is designed to operate to groups of Americans around the country -to be an impeachable offense? How does that work EXACTLY?

You ever actually HEAR what these two justices have spoken about, have you been told what they talk about is objectionable in some way? Of course you don't hear any complaints about WHAT they said - because they said NOTHING objectionable whatsoever! They are being condemned by assholes SO offended by the fact there are Americans who do not share their opinions, they actually think these two deserve to be IMPEACHED for no reason but WHO they said these non-objectional statements to!!!!! What utterly revolting hypocrisy. But SO typical of the left, so typical these leftwing extremist assholes think they have a right to dictate which groups of AMERICANS justices may and may not lecture about how our justice system works! Liberals DESPISE free speech and have done nothing but attempt marginalize the Americans who are part of the Tea Party because in reality, the left always believes allowing others to hear any opinions but their own is DANGEROUS. So dangerous they must be marginalized, mocked and ridiculed and then those damn justices turn around and act like they are Americans by speaking to them about how our justice works?? The nerve of them -we'll teach them not to adhere to our leftwing extremist rules about who is and is not a real American worthy of being spoken to! What a pack of asshole fuckheads. I am getting increasingly angry about the rank hypocrisy and utter arrogance of the left -as if they actually believe this country belongs to THEM alone. Guess again!

 

[JoeB131]

Cain is a piece of shit

I totally agree! Now, I wonder what he's going to do with his leftover campaign funds?

Legally, he can keep them and just pay tax on them.

 

[zonly1]

imo, and yes, he's also a whiner.

Good riddance to bad garbage.

I predicted this months ago.

But John Edwards had a love child visiting his cancer ridden wife with a paper; stands tall in your book right....

Double standard strikes again.

 

[Ravi]

By the way, anybody tell Ravi that her english isn't too good? Under her name iit says she hates "hatters". I think she means she "hates haters" but you never can tell about lefties. Maybe she just doesn't like the people who make hats.

 

[RadiomanATL]

By the way, anybody tell Ravi that her english isn't too good? Under her name iit says she hates "hatters". I think she means she "hates haters" but you never can tell about lefties. Maybe she just doesn't like the people who make hats.

 

[Ravi]

imo, and yes, he's also a whiner.

Good riddance to bad garbage.

I predicted this months ago.

I get it. You prefer a smooth, oily professional politician who knows how to do a masterful job lying to the public while using campaign funds to support his mistress, cheating on his dying wife and has a child out of wedlock -all while lying to the nation with a straight face and that "sincere" look he perfected and fully expecting to be elected to VP anyway (Edwards) or an even sleazier professional politician accused of nonstop extramarital affairs even after being elected President, had Arkansas state patrolmen accusing him as governor of using the highway patrol as his pimps to procure women for him, who knew how to convincingly wag that finger at the nation while denying ANY sexual relationship with that woman, and ended up being proven to be a serial sexual predator after one of his own staff members and campaign workers after another came forward accusing him of sexually assaulting them, after a federal judge ruled he had committed felony perjury in order to get a lawsuit settled in his favor. NO problem there though. As long as they have that "D" after their name, there is pretty much nothing that makes them pieces of shit in your eyes -because those guys are the "good' guys, right? ROFL

But someone who is not a career politician, someone who has never been confronted with dirty Chicago-style politics (and lets get real, all evidence points back to Obama operatives who did this to him -they also did the exact same thing to MULTIPLE opponents of Obama's in this IDENTICAL tactic because he chose who he would and would not allow to remain on the ballot. In fact I think he is actively trying to manipulate things to get the Republican nominee he wants to face), where the accusations were carefully timed to roll out with increasing seriousness as soon as the media frenzy died down because there was never a shred of evidence for any of the accusations. The tactic is the same one used in Chicago -it isn't whether the accusations are true or not that did in any of Obama's opponents he forced to quit the race -and in fact typically there was nothing more than just the accusation itself and no proof it was true at all. It was the sheer number of accusations that continued without evidence but still increased in severity until the person had enough and just quit. Even seasoned politicians couldn't fight that one (which was even attempted on McCain too but they couldn't find women to go along and finally gave up) but someone who was not a career politician and whose family was truly unprepared for the filth that was going to come the MINUTE he surged in the polls? Isn't it interesting they didn't start when he announced his candidacy -if it happened to me, that is when I would have come forward to let people know right off the bat this person is morally unfit. But no one was concerned about Cain's chances until he surged past Romney and THAT caused a real problem.

Come on -no accusations UNTIL he was ahead of Romney and the first were mild and even silly by a woman who took the minimal offer made by the company to go away because it was cheaper than going to court even if they won (compared to the $850,000 Clinton ended up paying Paula Jones). He didn't quit after getting a warning of what was to come -so once the media frenzy started to die down again, the new accusations ramped up. Made by an Obama staffer no less -who very, very interestingly could never bring herself to say OUT LOUD exactly what it was Cain was supposed to have done. She apparently believed that simply being female meant she was telling the truth -even though she has a history of filing sexual harassment claims -after all that is a known way to make easy money. But she is suddenly so RIGHTEOUS and even though she just can't say out loud what the AWFUL thing he is supposed to have said and she couldn't bring herself to come forward BEFORE this, suddenly with the help of that true piece of shit Allred, she wants to do a gang bang on Cain with other women to jointly accuse him. Curiously that just never happened. Apparently none of these women wanted THEIR accusations put under the microscope after all and they just disappeared into the woodwork like the cockroaches they are. Compare that to the women who accused Clinton -they NEVER went away. THAT is the difference between legitimate accusations and bullshit. That still wasn't enough to get Cain to quit either, the media frenzy died down again and that son of a bitch was still in the race and his backers still hadn't gone running for the hills. So out comes the woman claiming he groped her in a car. Now we have moved WAY beyond silly accusations about holding his hand up to indicate the height of his wife and moved straight into sexual assault. And its from a woman with such a well known bad reputation for lying that CBS anchor Bill Curtis said he didn't believe her and CBS outright refused to run with the story because she used to work for CBS and they knew firsthand this woman was not credible. (Neither did anyone else which is why she disappeared too). Media frenzy dies down AGAIN and Cain still is among the top three! DAMN! This CANNOT be tolerated! So a woman he knows waits until she can rack up 70 texts in a few weeks, nearly all of which SHE initiated asking Cain for money. Not one word in any of those texts about any improper relationship, not a word about pining for him, the "love" they supposedly shared, -just another hanger-on asking for money. And again -very interesting timing! In fact, the timing on all this has now become OBVIOUS! She doesn't feel the need to come forward until AFTER the media frenzy dies down yet again -which also gave her time to rack up the texts after not being in contact with the man for sometime since they don't go back any further than a few weeks. And this time it is with a claim that he had a long term sexual affair with her for THIRTEEN YEARS. Yet the only "evidence" she has are those 70 texts she made to him a few weeks before coming forward -where not one text was sexual in nature, never even hinted at a close relationship and just trying to hit him up for money again. THAT smells like a deliberate set-up BIG TIME. She needed time to set the trap -the fact he answered a few of those texts is being used against him even and she kept texting him until he did answer. But just imagine the field day she would have had if he had actually given her the money! LOL

My, but a cynic would say the real purpose of racking up all those texts was for no reason but setting a deliberate trap and she needed SOMETHING to be able to hold out as "evidence" to support her claim of a LONG TERM AFFAIR. It would have been better if he had given her money, but she wasn't able to get him to do it and had to settle for the 70 texts, 80% of which SHE wrote and none that remotely sounded affectionate or romantic. Indeed, in one he demands to know what she is doing to find a job. My God even Gennifer Flowers had raunchy messages left on her answering machine to back up her claim of an affair with Clinton that lasted a fraction of that time! As Cain's attorney pointed out, this woman is claiming he flew her all over the country for illicit sex romps -so where are the records showing her flights, where are the hotel records? Airlines and hotels archive their records -so they should be there. If it happened. She can't afford to produce phony ones and just pick any date -the man has a verifiable record of where he was during that time too. So......no airline and hotel records to back up any claim about their wild travels to have sex after all. His attorney is STILL demanding copies of her phone records -and she refuses. Why would she refuse? IF she is telling the truth about the many hours they talked and texted and just ...LOVED. But all she has are 70 texts nearly all of which are ones SHE made in the last few weeks. I guarantee if I had been having an affair with a married person for 13 years, there are going to be at least a couple of people who know about it -not one person came forward to support a single word this woman said. In other words -this is one more person who can't prove her claim but she is the one who should have had the most evidence to back it up! Just like the rest she expects to have her story taken at face value. Are you seriously going to suggest if a WOMAN makes an accusation of sexual misconduct against a man, that is proof enough for you? Really? Do you really need to compare that to the media frenzy intent on TRASHING and DESTROYING the women who accused their hero Clinton? Even with evidence to back it up, the media believed their job was to go after anyone who threatened a DEMOCRAT. The media was complicit in keeping the public from knowing Edwards was cheating on his dying wife and had gotten his mistress pregnant until it couldn't be hidden anymore! The double standard is nauseating.

In the end it just didn't matter -Cain was killed by the sheer number and the fact none of these women could prove any of their claims was irrelevant. THAT is the kind of filthy politics Cain and his family were never prepared for and never got a handle how to properly combat them.

Oh sure, the only REAL person in the group of professional politicians -but HE is the piece of shit here Ravi. (That tells me quite a bit about your own character actually.) I got it. But I bet you didn't even hold your nose before voting for the REAL pieces of shit like that total scumbag criminal Edwards who looked the public straight in the eye and lied through his teeth about his affair while his wife was sick and lied through his teeth that he used campaign funds to support her. I bet you had NO problem voting for that criminal scumbag sexual predator Clinton either. THAT is no doubt really, really different in your mind. Probably something you ADMIRE like so many other Democrats.

Because THEY were career politicians and lied with EASE, with their usual oiliness, used their career politician wives and phony families as props while they lied -and that made it acceptable to you. Its the real person confronted with dirty politics and the use of amorphous, vague, unspoken accusations that were carefully crafted for both the timing and the seriousness of the accusations -yet still without a shred of evidence for any. And THAT is the person you find to be a piece of shit. Gee, if he only had "D" after his name -lol.

I too made a prediction when the Obama staffer claimed sexual harassment but oddly could never bring herself to describe exactly what it was he was supposedly to have done and the gang bang on Cain she wanted to do with other women and that real piece of shit Allred just.........went away. I said then the accusations would not only continue BUT would increase in severity UNTIL HE QUIT -but they wouldn't have any more credibility either and it was the sheer number that would do him in spite of the fact none of them considered individually amounted to jackshit and couldn't be backed up. MY prediction is better than yours -because HERE is the real clue the entire thing was a well crafted political tactic to get this man out of the race. The most serious accusations do NOT come last-unless you might be facing Obama. For everyone else when they are true -they come out right off the bat or very quickly after the first. They are NOT strung out like this for maximum media exposure, wait until the feeding frenzy dies then trot out the next one, increasing in severity each time. (And yes, for a Baptist minister to have had a 13 year affair would be considered the most serious of all these accusations.)

And here is another prediction -there won't be any more accusations of sexual misconduct. Because this is MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. Which totally begs the question about who really believes a candidate waits until they have all come forward and THEN quits. Oh sure. Interestingly, this is the IDENTICAL pattern again in Chicago against Obama opponents. After the nonstop accusations of sexual misconduct that were carefully timed to exploit media attention and in severity - they mysteriously all disappeared once his opponent quit. Obama has an odds defying record for the number of his opponents felled by nonstop accusations of sexual misconduct FAR beyond that of politicians in the game for decades. Seriously. He did NOT want to chance this being an historic race of two black men running for President -even if he believed he could beat him, it would force an uncomfortable change in his campaign strategy and eliminate the ability of him to use the race card for any audience that might be receptive to it.

There are some real pieces of shit in this story -but it isn't the guy who didn't have a clue what it meant to play with the big boys from Chicago and was naive enough to believe it was all about who had the best ideas.

Nah, Edwards is a POS as well. I've stated that here on the forum more than once. But nice try at deflection.

 

[tinydancer]

Watching Cain standing on that stage today lying through his teeth in front of his wife was remarkable.

Ladies and gentlemen, here's the women I cheated on!

No proof and all the women are bitches from hell.

As compared to Billy bang a queen in a trailer park Clinton.

too funny little ones.

 

[Gagafritz]

I fail to see how Cain is any worse than Clinton.

 

[tinydancer]

Anyone wanna chat about JFK's moments. I know, lets talk about LBJ.

Better yet, lets talk about the swimmer, you know the lion of the senate who let a woman drown to death.

Shall I continue? Or how about the lion of the senate who loved doing waitress sandwiches with Chris Dodds?

You idiots on the left. By all means go for Cain. Watch what happens.

 

[daveman]

Pretending this thread is the entirety of reality is disingenuous.

nice pic. did you really mean to post that being a rightie?

Yes. It disproves Bode's claim that only Stephanie said Clinton was impeached for a blowjob.

I bet you believe that ridiculous idea, don't you?

This is what Stephanie said:

Clinton had affairs, was even convicted for one..

yet most here still say, He was a GREAT President.

that is the two faced double standards of most on the left.

Convicted of having an affair? Stephanie

He wasn't "convicted of having an affair"

I know that. Stephanie knows that. She and I were mocking the common leftist claim that Clinton was impeached for a blow job, not perjury.

Do keep up.