C.E.RN. Proposes alternate cause for Global warming

Discussion in 'Environment' started by code1211, Sep 8, 2011.

  1. code1211
    Offline

    code1211 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    5,999
    Thanks Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +845
    CERN is arguably the most scientifically motivated group of people on the planet.

    The UN is argualbly the most politicallly motivated group of of people on the planet.

    The UN through its proxy puppet organization, the IPCC, has been for years trying to redistribute world wealth based on the assertion that CO2 causes global warming. Much evidence to the contrary is dismissed by those who support the IPCC.

    Also the fact that the case is not proven is swept aside by the supporters.

    CERN has put forth a different theory that explains almost all of the temperature change over the last century and does so without any reference to CO2.

    Should we look to our scientists (CERN) for scientific theory or to our politicians (UN)?

    You make the call.

    A plain English explanation of the CERN Findings in a video. The title of the link is a little inflamatory and the interviewer is agenda driven, but the expert explains it pretty well and cautions that this does not disprove the CO2 idea. It only proposes a different theory that works also:

    MORE ON CERN PROVING GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISTS WRONG…….. |
     
  2. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,189
    Thanks Received:
    1,070
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,440
    politics certainly does play a part. the head of CERN came out weeks before the release of the contoversial paper and disavowed any climate change attributes. not mentioning Svendsmark was also a churlish thing to do.
     
  3. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,419
    Thanks Received:
    5,406
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,281
    Look at the graphs on this site. Now what corelates with what? Looks as if the cosmic rays have little effect.

    Cosmic rays – again
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,419
    Thanks Received:
    5,406
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,281
  5. code1211
    Offline

    code1211 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    5,999
    Thanks Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +845


    So the blogs and the agenda driven Real Climate oppose the scientists from CERN.

    The leading scientific research center on the planet vs. a blog. Hardly seems like a fair fight.
     
  6. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,189
    Thanks Received:
    1,070
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,440
    actually Old Rocks and RC bring up a very interesting point. science doesnt understand why there are as many clouds formed as there is. yet another area with incomplete understanding that is just plugged into climate models with no admission of the uncertainty
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,419
    Thanks Received:
    5,406
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,281
    If you read what the scientists stated concerning CERN's researchs, they were glad to have the additional information. However, those claiming that the article stated that it was the answer to global warming are totally wrong, as the authors of the article have stated. Another point of data. One which may play a role, but not a major one.
     

Share This Page