Bush's approval Rating at a new low

M

midswat

Guest
Looks like the republicans are finally starting to get it.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060311...uiKXWms0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3OXIzMDMzBHNlYwM3MDM-


WASHINGTON - More and more people, particularly Republicans, disapprove of President Bush's performance, question his character and no longer consider him a strong leader against terrorism, according to an AP-Ipsos poll documenting one of the bleakest points of his presidency.


Nearly four out of five Americans, including 70 percent of Republicans, believe civil war will break out in Iraq — the bloody hot spot upon which Bush has staked his presidency. Nearly 70 percent of people say the U.S. is on the wrong track, a 6-point jump since February.

"Obviously, it's the winter of our discontent," said Rep. Tom Cole (news, bio, voting record), R-Okla.

Republican Party leaders said the survey explains why GOP lawmakers are rushing to distance themselves from Bush on a range of issues — port security, immigration, spending, warrantless eavesdropping and trade, for example.

The positioning is most intense among Republicans facing election in November and those considering 2008 presidential campaigns.

"You're in the position of this cycle now that is difficult anyway. In second term off-year elections, there gets to be a familiarity factor," said Sen. Sam Brownback (news, bio, voting record), R-Kan., a potential presidential candidate.

"People have seen and heard (Bush's) ideas long enough and that enters into their thinking. People are kind of, `Well, I wonder what other people can do,'" he said.

The poll suggests that most Americans wonder whether Bush is up to the job. The survey, conducted Monday through Wednesday of 1,000 people, found that just 37 percent approve of his overall performance. That is the lowest of his presidency.

Bush's job approval among Republicans plummeted from 82 percent in February to 74 percent, a dangerous sign in a midterm election year when parties rely on enthusiasm from their most loyal voters. The biggest losses were among white males.

On issues, Bush's approval rating declined from 39 percent to 36 percent for his handling of domestic affairs and from 47 percent to 43 percent on foreign policy and terrorism. His approval ratings for dealing with the economy and Iraq held steady, but still hovered around 40 percent.

Personally, far fewer Americans consider Bush likable, honest, strong and dependable than they did just after his re-election campaign.

By comparison, Presidents Clinton and Reagan had public approval in the mid 60s at this stage of their second terms in office, while Eisenhower was close to 60 percent, according to Gallup polls. Nixon, who was increasingly tangled up in the Watergate scandal, was in the high 20s in early 1974.

The AP-Ipsos poll, which has a margin of error of 3 percentage points, gives Republicans reason to worry that they may inherit Bush's political woes. Two-thirds of the public disapproves of how the GOP-led Congress is handling its job and a surprising 53 percent of Republicans give Congress poor marks.

By a 47-36 margin, people favor Democrats over Republicans when they are asked who should control Congress.

While the gap worries Republicans, it does not automatically translate into GOP defeats in November, when voters will face a choice between local candidates rather than considering Congress as a whole.

In addition, strategists in both parties agree that a divided and undisciplined Democratic Party has failed to seize full advantage of Republican troubles.

"While I don't dispute the fact that we have challenges in the current environment politically, I also believe 2006 as a choice election offers Republicans an opportunity if we make sure the election is framed in a way that will keep our majorities in the House and the Senate," said Ken Mehlman, chairman of the Republican National Committee.

Stung by criticism, senior officials at the White House and the RNC are reminding GOP members of Congress that Bush's approval ratings may be low, but theirs is lower and have declined at the same pace as Bush's. The message to GOP lawmakers is that criticizing the president weakens him — and them — politically.

"When issue like the internal Republican debate over the ports dominates the news it puts us another day away from all of us figuring out what policies we need to win," said Terry Nelson, a Republican consultant and political director for Bush's re-election campaign in 2004.

Bowing to ferocious opposition in Congress, a Dubai-owned company on Thursday abandoned its quest to take over operations at several U.S. ports. Bush had pledged to veto any attempt to block the transaction, pitting him against Republicans in Congress and most voters.

All this has Republican voters like Walter Wright of Fairfax Station, Va., worried for their party.

"We've gotten so carried away I wouldn't be surprised to see the Democrats take it because of discontent," he said. "People vote for change and hope for the best."
 
I just knew Walter Wright would be out there to talk for all Republicans.
 
I just heard on the news how bush said that we are sending a bad message to the arab world over the dubai port deal. As if invading another country, and putting arabs on leashes etc doesnt send enough of a bad message to arabs and the rest of the world.
 
so now suddenly republicans are smart ?

wonder what they will say when civil war doesn't break out and the dems lose in 06 and 08.....

do they really think all the people they called red state idiots wil vote for them? and didn't they all move to france and canada after bush stole ttwo elcetions in a row.....i mean we are just going to steal 06 and 08....
 
I dont think that most people care if its a republican or democrat at this point...They just want anybody but Bush. I know thats how I feel. I would vote for McCain in a heartbeat. I have never seen a president have a worse second term in my lifetime than GW. First term wasnt that good either.



manu1959 said:
so now suddenly republicans are smart ?

wonder what they will say when civil war doesn't break out and the dems lose in 06 and 08.....

do they really think all the people they called red state idiots wil vote for them? and didn't they all move to france and canada after bush stole ttwo elcetions in a row.....i mean we are just going to steal 06 and 08....
 
midswat said:
I dont think that most people care if its a republican or democrat at this point...They just want anybody but Bush. I know thats how I feel. I would vote for McCain in a heartbeat. I have never seen a president have a worse second term in my lifetime than GW. First term wasnt that good either.
And you liked him when? Care to share your feelings on Jimmy Carter?
 
You sound like you are too hung up on Democrat vs Republican, did it ever occur to you that alot of people may just be for right and wrong and dont blindly vote for a party no matter who runs ? My parents and I have voted for both democrat and republican candidates. I voted for Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr, I also voted for Bill Clinton cause I thought both of them were the best candidates and they were.



Kathianne said:
And you liked him when? Care to share your feelings on Jimmy Carter?
 
midswat said:
I dont think that most people care if its a republican or democrat at this point...They just want anybody but Bush. I know thats how I feel. I would vote for McCain in a heartbeat. I have never seen a president have a worse second term in my lifetime than GW. First term wasnt that good either.

yea you are probably right bush doesn't stand a chance vs mccain.....how many second term pres have ther ben in your life time? 2

yea clinton getting blow jobs in the white house from fat chicks and dippin cigars was a high point......freeing the afgan and iraqi people from dictatorships pales in comparision
 
Your right, Iraq is in much better shape right now !!! :dunno:


manu1959 said:
yea you are probably right bush doesn't stand a chance vs mccain.....how many second term pres have ther ben in your life time? 2

yea clinton getting blow jobs in the white house from fat chicks and dippin cigars was a high point......freeing the afgan and iraqi people from dictatorships pales in comparision
 
midswat said:
You sound like you are too hung up on Democrat vs Republican, did it ever occur to you that alot of people may just be for right and wrong and dont blindly vote for a party no matter who runs ? My parents and I have voted for both democrat and republican candidates. I voted for Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr, I also voted for Bill Clinton cause I thought both of them were the best candidates and they were.
Wow, in one paragraph you moved from my being 'hung up...'; to not answering either question I posed; to your voting record.

I asked when it was you 'liked' GW, if ever? Your opinion of Jimmy Carter?
 
I liked GW when he first ran for president. I wasnt fond of Carter. hows that.

Kathianne said:
Wow, in one paragraph you moved from my being 'hung up...'; to not answering either question I posed; to your voting record.

I asked when it was you 'liked' GW, if ever? Your opinion of Jimmy Carter?
 
midswat said:
Your right, Iraq is in much better shape right now !!! :dunno:

well i am glad you agree.....for a minute there you had me worried......i was concerned that you still wanted a police state that gassed its own people, fed people into wood chippers, tortured their national soccer teams after they lost, gave money to suicide bombers, had no womens rights, order the assasination of forigen presidents and set oil fields alight to pollute the environment....rep 4 you
 
If George is so concerned about freeing oppressed people why not go into Africa and clean that mess up, its been much worse than Iraq for a long long time. Oh wait, the nations Oil reserve isnt there, silly me. Oh yeah, I forgot, its also filled with Black people right George ? :soul:


manu1959 said:
well i am glad you agree.....for a minute there you had me worried......i was concerned that you still wanted a police state that gassed its own people, fed people into wood chippers, tortured their national soccer teams after they lost, gave money to suicide bombers, had no womens rights, order the assasination of forigen presidents and set oil fields alight to pollute the environment....rep 4 you
 
midswat said:
If George is so concerned about freeing oppressed people why not go into Africa and clean that mess up, its been much worse than Iraq for a long long time. Oh wait, the nations Oil reserve isnt there, silly me.
I suggest you search the words 'Darfur' or 'Sudan'. Especially focus on NATO's responses and perhaps a few of mine.
 
midswat said:
If George is so concerned about freeing oppressed people why not go into Africa and clean that mess up, its been much worse than Iraq for a long long time. Oh wait, the nations Oil reserve isnt there, silly me. Oh yeah, I forgot, its also filled with Black people right George ? :soul:

bush is waiting for the UN and congress to approve it....doesn't want to get in trouble again for waging an illegal war ...... why didn't clinton go in to dafur or the congo or rawanda?
 
mmmmmm, nah, id rather not..


Kathianne said:
I suggest you search the words 'Darfur' or 'Sudan'. Especially focus on NATO's responses and perhaps a few of mine.
 

Forum List

Back
Top