Bush Will Address the Nation at 5:45pm

If we'd gone off the deep end the Administration would be running to go testify under oath to clear their good name. But, instead they're trying to hide. Only the guilty try to hide this hard.

Truly you haven't a clue.
 
Truly you haven't a clue.

That's the best you can come up with?

Explain why the Administration isn't running to go testify then... if the truth will set them free, why aren't they freely appearing before Congress to set the "moonbat Congress" straight?
 
if everything they did was on the up and up.... if it was all totally above board, why not go before congress and explain it. If there is nothing wrong with removing US attorneys simply because they do not pass the Bush administration political litmust test, why not just say so?
 
The bolded part is all you've got. since he hired them, that type of discrimination would be pretty hard to argue, but go ahead.

Methinks some of the moonbats need anger management, as you have definately gone off the deep end over GW.

Since you claim Bush is King that type of claim is pretty hard to argue, but go ahead.

Your statement, "They serve at the pleasure of the president." Is also dead wrong. The power to fire is not to mean, "They serve at the pleasure of the president". The power to fire is to mean, "they serve at the pleasure of the People."

Since you have shown zero understanding of why our government exists and to make any attempt to explain why our government exits to you would be like describing light to a blind man.

Our government does not exist to serve at the pleasure of the president. Our government exists to serve the pleasure of the People. The President took an oath to do just that. But he violated that oath when he forced government employees to abandoned their loyalty to the People under the threat of dismissal. He violated his oath when he demands government employees to be loyal only to him. He has abused his power to fire. This abuse is what must be investigated by Congress and corrected.

Bush is just as ignorant as you are as he believes just as you do that this government exits to serve him. Nothing could be more wrong.
 
The bolded part is all you've got. since he hired them, that type of discrimination would be pretty hard to argue, but go ahead.

Methinks some of the moonbats need anger management, as you have definately gone off the deep end over GW.

One more thing you left out the "For Instance" when you responded. So when you came back with, "is all you got," it shows your reading comprehesion is in need of fine tuning.

If you had left in the "For Instance" then you would know that I giving you "For Instances" to show you how wrong you are about "they serve at the pleasure of the President" which by the way is a Gonzales statement and Gonzales is a loyal Bushie and a disloyal American.
 
One more thing you left out the "For Instance" when you responded. So when you came back with, "is all you got," it shows your reading comprehesion is in need of fine tuning.

If you had left in the "For Instance" then you would know that I giving you "For Instances" to show you how wrong you are about "they serve at the pleasure of the President" which by the way is a Gonzales statement and Gonzales is a loyal Bushie and a disloyal American.
Twas not a problem, your 'for instances' meant somehow firing for reasons that would violate federal laws regarding discrimination of some sort. Not the accusations.
 
Whatever. The bottom line is that when you are asked a question, you are to answer a question. If you do not what to answer the question, then you say, “I won’t answer the question”. If know the answer to the question, then you answer the question. If you do not know the answer to the question, then you say that you do not know the answer. It is as simple as that. How much more difficult can it be?

Unless you provide a contingency dependent upon what the definition of "is" is...correct?
 
Unless you provide a contingency dependent upon what the definition of "is" is...correct?

And this is the guy who accuses me of baiting, trolling, distraction and misdirection?

Way to show us how you're above such tactics.
 
Incorrect. The Preamble of the United States Constitution is quite clear that the government has been instituted to serve the People of The United States.

All three branches are to serve the People of the United States. The Department of Justice is to be an apolitical dept and it is the duty of Congress to investigate and with powers of oversight make any correction deemed necessary. They did this when they took away the Executive Branch's power to replace prosecutors without Senate confirmation.

You are incorrect in that nothing is written in stone. For instance if the President dismissed someone based on race, creed and religion or disablility the President cannot hide behind the, "They serve at the pleasure of the president" as you claim. The President can be guilty of discrimination. The President is not above the law.

The current investigation of which Bush is running from is an investigation to remedy a serious problem Bush created. A problem that taints and pollutes the DOJ that was once a dept that the people can trust but can no longer trust in it due to the corruption of Bush.

One email even state "loyal Bushies" whatever happened to "loyal Americans"?

Are loyal Americans no longer suitable for Bush? Based on what is unfolding it would appear that way.

We want to find out how he tainted and polluted the DOJ.

The reason President Bush is being investigated for something every President before him has done on the "ho-hum" level is called witch hunting. It's just partisan BS.

How about doing something about the f-ing border and tackling a REAL problem?
 
if everything they did was on the up and up.... if it was all totally above board, why not go before congress and explain it. If there is nothing wrong with removing US attorneys simply because they do not pass the Bush administration political litmust test, why not just say so?

He did. Apparently, that's not good enough. I view this in the same light I viewed Monicagate .... a monumental waste of time and money that will come to nothing in the end.

I'm sick and tired of Congress, regardless which party has the majoritym thinking their job is to run around witch-hunting and policing their political opponests holding office instead of taking care of the issues that face this Nation.

EVERY major issue this Nation faces today has been the same for the past 20 years at least.
 
The reason President Bush is being investigated for something every President before him has done on the "ho-hum" level is called witch hunting. It's just partisan BS.

How about doing something about the f-ing border and tackling a REAL problem?

Gonzales should be impeached. He first lied to Congress by claiming the firings were done for performance reasons; emails proved otherwise. He again lied to Congress by making the claim that he had no part in the firings; emails proved otherwise. Gonzales had actually signed off on the firings. Liars like this we do not need and we need to impeach him.

Your claim that this is a witch hunt is false. The fired prosecutors have a valid claim to take to the Legislative Branch, because their firings was based on politics and the WH attempts to politicize the DOJ.

As for witch hunt, compared with what? The Whitewater investigation ended with no charges related to the original investigation and veered instead into sexual exposé -- which had what connection with Whitewater? Now there was a partisan witch hunt.

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ed...les_should_be_impeached/?p1=email_to_a_friend

In refusing to cooperate, Bush puffed himself up to the swaggering truculence that has worn so thin, declaring, "We will not cooperate with a partisan fishing expedition." But this investigation is hardly partisan, since several Republican senators and congressmen have called for Gonzales to resign. And if there were ever a legitimate subject of full congressional investigation, tampering with criminal investigations on political grounds is surely one.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top