I've heard a lot of people- like that dumb fuc&ing hatemonger Savage[ Rush, I'm sorry you get lumped in with such lowly scum/scam losers.]- of late wondering why President Bush hasn't addressed the nation about the Fallujah massacre. Well, either they are a little dense or they work for Al Qaeda. I vehemently disagree that President Bush should have addressed the nation on this disgusting affront to humanity & God, ANY god. See, if these animals can get the leader of the free world to address the nation & world every time they commit an act of brutal mass murder, then they win. Not only do they win, his addressing the nation would encourage even MORE attacks. Think about it: If you were a terrorist, committed this atrocity, and the leader of your enemy changed his schedule-- possibly flying back from somewhere- diverted his attention to address the nation, and had to take hits from his anti-American rivals, what would you think? A) Gee, we didn't mean to go THAT far. I hate that Bush the Great Satan had to be inconvenienced that way. B) Wow! His words to his nation really hurt my feelings, what with the calling us mean names & all. I won't do THIS again! or...... C) We have The Great Satan reacting to us. We are on the same level, equals. Wait until we make the NEXT one even bigger & more gruesome. The infidels are on the run & we shall be victorious! No, Bush would have only encouraged more attacks by addressing the nation. Now, you might say he addressed us on 9/11, right? Well, if I have to explain the difference to someone-- both in leadership & strategy- then they are a lost cause. I admit it is a fine line between when Bush should & should not address the nation, but there IS a demarcation line, one where an incorrect response could cause more chaos & cost more lives. As for the massacres in Fallujah, it is ALSO a tightrope walk. Yeah, I would love to send a remote control-driven vehicle through the streets, draw an attack, and drop a huge Motherfucker Of All Bombs, but that might be a disaster. The line which we must balance ourselves is one between pure, beautiful revenge, and one of "we will take the high road and not be dragged down to their level." Compromise? We send in the Marines, tanks, and a LOT of heavily armed Iraqi police/militia with us. We, after having shut down all exits out of Fallujah, go door to door, confiscate ALL weapons, find the majority of guilty parties from the video, and arrest "most" of them. However, if we can find the main culprits of the attack, we have the right to "humanely" execute them in the city square and leave their bodies to rot. I normally would be against this, but the attacks were so brutal and the celebration so sadistically great, the crazed looks of joy in the murderers eyes leads me to make an exception for one reason: WE CANNOT LET THE PEOPLE OF THIS HOTBED OF OLD SADDAM THUGS CONFUSE KINDNESS WITH WEAKNESS. [Random Advice]- Yo, Spain! How's that deal with The Devil working our for ya guys? Gee, I guess trying to appease terrorists just doesn't work out so well, huh? Here's a tip: Unions negotiate. Sports agents negotiate. Terrorists do NOT. They just like to kill as many infidels as possible. Ya might want to write that down on a post-it note and read it on your next train trip. btw- Don't thank me for the advice. What can I say?.....I'm a giver! While I know liberals believe peace can be attained through discussion, bumper stickers, and begging the U.N., Russia, Germany, & France to let us defend ourselves, but Reagan proved to us that there is only ONE way to win the peace:........... PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH! The liberals can apoplectically cry, kick, & scream on the evening of November 2nd, but even THEY will be protected under the safety umbrella of another four years of one of the greatest presidents, ever: President George W. Bush!