- Sep 12, 2008
- 14,201
- 3,567
- 185
Thing about that chart is, up until Nov 2010, those were increases in unemployment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
While you're entitled to your opinions, you're not entitled to your own set of skewed facts.Gubmint hiring a bunch of new bureaucrats aren't "jobs gained" in any meaningful sense.
When there's some verifiable evidence that any "jobs gained" are in the sector of the workforce that produces things of value for the free economy, come back and tell us about it.
I told you, the right wing narrative would change.
that's chris the morons fav siteA chart from a winger site.... ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh ahhhh hahahahahahahahahahaha
What an ignoramus
shhhh, dont force them to look at who REALLY has it's hands on the economy
I love this chart!
Remind me again, when did the Dems take over Congress?
Bush stole the election from Gore in which year?
Gubmint hiring a bunch of new bureaucrats aren't "jobs gained" in any meaningful sense.
When there's some verifiable evidence that any "jobs gained" are in the sector of the workforce that produces things of value for the free economy, come back and tell us about it.
When there's some verifiable evidence that any "jobs gained" are in the sector of the workforce that produces things of value for the free economy, come back and tell us about it.
Gubmint hiring a bunch of new bureaucrats aren't "jobs gained" in any meaningful sense.
When there's some verifiable evidence that any "jobs gained" are in the sector of the workforce that produces things of value for the free economy, come back and tell us about it.
The economy in March saw its largest jobs gain in three years, largely driven by private sector hiring.
You have heard that a zillion temp workers have been hired to sit around and pretend they're taking the census, haven't you?I didn't make the claim or post the pretty colored chart, so the onus isn't on me.
Yes you did. I'll even quote you..
"Gubmint hiring a bunch of new bureaucrats aren't "jobs gained" in any meaningful sense."
Please show that the increase of jobs are Govt bureaucrats....
In fact, one of them posts here and has testified that the whole thing is a monumental Chinese fire drill and purposeful waste of money.
I thought the economy was supposed to fail?
I looked at it, Magpie....I also can look at a calendar.
Why? Because it didn't address YOUR comments? Look at the title of the thread, Dud.
Not exactly an official site. ReaganBushDebt.org Now there's a non biased site if I ever saw one.
Nice try though.
Bush became president in 2007?
For most of his presidency, the Dubya unemployment rate was under 6%.
Unemployment was 7.2% when Dubya left office.
It didn't reach 6% until August 2008.
Haven't seen that promised 8% since January 2009.
Unemployment rate has been stuck at 9.7% for the past three months.
So why did we spend a trillion dollars?
The United States Unemployment Rate