Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
there are threats all over the world. there are despot leaders all over the world. At some point in time, the fable of the boy who cried wolf starts to become applicable.... especially after we have wasted 31K dead and wounded, a half a trillion dollars and five years on a boneheaded invasion/conquest/occupation of Iraq. The point being: if you are going to actually try, in the wake of 9/11, and get the citizenry of America to back invading and deposing of bad guys.... you had better make sure it is worth our while to do so. YOur team has failed miserably. Let the democrats try to do a better job for four years.... we certainly cannot make things MUCH worse than they are now!
More idiocy from you. You reinforce exactly what conservatives say about your party. You do not give one RAT's Ass what danger there is, you will oppose any action JUST because Bush is in office.
No one believes your president anymore. I think Iran is definetly a rouge state, and their nuclear ambitions are problematic. But, I'll be damned if I believe you or george bush again. You didn't fool me the first time on iraq, you're not going to fool me again.
I'm going to trust the word of the IAEA and their inspectors in iran. I'm not going to believe anything bush says.
And lets see, FRANCE and the IAEA DO say Ira is a threat, FRANCE says War may be required.... But do pretend otherwise.
Look a little deeper. Why is Iran now a threat? Maybe because up until four years ago their Great Satan was thousands of miles away. Now, they're next door holding up a puppet (in Iran's eyes) regime...So if Iran invaded Canada and toppled it's PM and destroyed its infrastructure the US would sit back and go "wassup?". Bush (well, Cheney and his cabal really) has done nothing but light fires from the moment he took office. It'll take a Dem president a full term just to get them under control, let alone put them out...
More idiocy from you. You reinforce exactly what conservatives say about your party. You do not give one RAT's Ass what danger there is, you will oppose any action JUST because Bush is in office.
there are threats all over the world. there are despot leaders all over the world. At some point in time, the fable of the boy who cried wolf starts to become applicable.... especially after we have wasted 31K dead and wounded, a half a trillion dollars and five years on a boneheaded invasion/conquest/occupation of Iraq. The point being: if you are going to actually try, in the wake of 9/11, and get the citizenry of America to back invading and deposing of bad guys.... you had better make sure it is worth our while to do so. YOur team has failed miserably. Let the democrats try to do a better job for four years.... we certainly cannot make things MUCH worse than they are now!
shoulda left iraq alone so it could eyeball iran and vice versa. Kept the conflict regional. Instead, the world is now an unsafer place. Thank you Mr Bush!
No one believes your president anymore. I think Iran is definetly a rouge state, and their nuclear ambitions are problematic. But, I'll be damned if I believe you or george bush again. You didn't fool me the first time on iraq, you're not going to fool me again.
I'm going to trust the word of the IAEA and their inspectors in iran. I'm not going to believe anything bush says.
The problem with your mindset, IMO, is it is just such an attitude that allowed 9/11 to happen. Turning a blind eye to threats because they're "all over the world."
Then, when it blows up in our faces and someone dies, the people with such a mindset are the first to start pointing fingers.
So, magically the Iranian Nuclear programs have only been going on since 2003? What a joke.
I disagree the world is a less safer place simply because the US invaded Iraq. Iraq is a less safer place, and the Middle East a less stable region.
But if the entire world is a less safer place because of the threat Iran poses, then that threat needs to be addressed by the entire world, and obviously, throwing words at them has had little, if any impact.
With the world relying on oil supplies, the world vicariously becomes an unsafer place. Why should the world take on a problem the US created?
The US created the Iranian Nuclear hunt? The US forced the rest of the world to use Oil? What a crock of horse shit.
Who is at the forefront of the Iranian nuclear "hunt"? Mali? Mongolia? Of course the US didn't force the rest of hte world to use oil, but what it did do, as I said in my original statement, was exacerbate the problem. You tried putting out a fire with gasoline. If you go into the jungle and wound a tiger and he gets pissed off at you and mauls you, is it his fault you came into his jungle and shot at him, or is it you own damn stupid fault?
