Bush got Saddam Hussein

Clearly ridding the World of Saddam was more important.

These three links will show,

1. 30 nations got oil contract from Iraq 1995-1999.
The French, Russians and China got the best deal thanks to food for oil deals.
Facts on Who Benefits From Keeping Saddam Hussein In Power

2. Spring of 2001 Dick Cheney's Iraq Oil Map.
Prior to 9/11 Cheney was already planning to control Iraqi oil contracts
"By 2010 we will need [a further] 50 million barrels a day. The Middle East, with two-thirds of the oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize lies." - US Vice President Dick Cheney, then Halliburton chief executive officer, London, autumn 1999
White House energy task forcepapers reveal Iraqi oil maps

3. 1-31-2001 Oval Office Meeting
This meeting was a discussion on how to remove Hussein from Iraq.
The meeting ended with W. saying, "Find me a way to do this".
Bush Sought 'Way' To Invade Iraq? - CBS News

In 2008, England and America finally got the contracts they were after.
BBC NEWS | Business | Iraq in third overseas oil deal

Bin Laden was a scapegoat. This was an American plan played out by Powerful Americans.
9/11 and Iraq was a UN deal.

USA pretty much kicks ass! I love this Country.

They are all pawns on our chess board!
 
I doubt many of you NaziCons even know who April Glaspie was.

Is the US State Department still keeping April Glaspie under wraps?

So now it's our fault that Saddam invaded kuwait the first time...

Gotta love the left! Just blame America for all that is wrong with the world...

You are an idiot laquinta

Saddam had legitimate grievances against Kuwait. Bush 41 gave him the "green light" to invade Kuwait. Then Bush 41 invaded Iraq. Then, years later, Bush 43 invaded Iraq. All for Iraq's oil.
 
I doubt many of you NaziCons even know who April Glaspie was.

Is the US State Department still keeping April Glaspie under wraps?

So now it's our fault that Saddam invaded kuwait the first time...

Gotta love the left! Just blame America for all that is wrong with the world...

You are an idiot laquinta

Saddam had legitimate grievances against Kuwait. Bush 41 gave him the "green light" to invade Kuwait. Then Bush 41 invaded Iraq. Then, years later, Bush 43 invaded Iraq. All for Iraq's oil.

We like oil!

Keep on lying to yourself, you may even start to believe your wacko BS some day!
 
I doubt many of you NaziCons even know who April Glaspie was.

Is the US State Department still keeping April Glaspie under wraps?

Glaspie never gave Saddam a green light to invade or attack ANY countries. Whats more, after the Bush administration stated that this would NOT stand and started to deploy the first US troops to Saudi Arabia and the United Nations passed its first security council resolution demanding Saddam withdraw his troops from Kuwait, what did Saddam do?

After all of that Saddam then announced he was annexing KUWAIT! First time another country annexed a neighbor since Hitler did it in the early 1940s. Saddam did not give TWO SHITS about what April Glaspie had to say and had already planned to invade annex Kuwait long before that meeting. He believed he was ready and fully expected a fight with the US which he believed he could win by inflicting significant casualties on the United States. He believed the United States was WEAK because of its experience in Vietnam. He was ready and sent 8 divisions into Kuwait, far more than what was needed to overrun the country because he was expecting a more immediate US military response. That did not come because the US took a cautious approach and slowly built a very large force to retake Kuwait. But make no doubt about it, Saddam wanted Kuwait and he was fully prepared to to fight the United States for it. OTHERWISE he would not of annexed the country and would have removed his troops in the 6 months he had in the country before the coalition attack which started in January 1991.
 
I doubt many of you NaziCons even know who April Glaspie was.

Is the US State Department still keeping April Glaspie under wraps?

So now it's our fault that Saddam invaded kuwait the first time...

Gotta love the left! Just blame America for all that is wrong with the world...

You are an idiot laquinta

Saddam had legitimate grievances against Kuwait. Bush 41 gave him the "green light" to invade Kuwait. Then Bush 41 invaded Iraq. Then, years later, Bush 43 invaded Iraq. All for Iraq's oil.

LOL, really? So what were the legitimate grievances that Saddam had against the Kuwait that would allow him to invade the country and then ANNEX the country wiping it from the face of the Earth.
 
So now it's our fault that Saddam invaded kuwait the first time...

Gotta love the left! Just blame America for all that is wrong with the world...

You are an idiot laquinta

Saddam had legitimate grievances against Kuwait. Bush 41 gave him the "green light" to invade Kuwait. Then Bush 41 invaded Iraq. Then, years later, Bush 43 invaded Iraq. All for Iraq's oil.

LOL, really? So what were the legitimate grievances that Saddam had against the Kuwait that would allow him to invade the country and then ANNEX the country wiping it from the face of the Earth.

You will learn that intelligent conversation with lakoota is impossible. He/she/it doesn't live in the real world. I think they are just an indian spirit juiced up on Wild Turkey.
 
Come on now!!!! That was just to stop Hitler....

Obama got BIN LADEN! Besides, everyone knows the French are totally worthless anyway...

Well, in both cases the United States did not want to see innocent civilians die, but unfortunately that was a result of the United States doing what was a necessity. Removing Saddam became a necessity as well given the crumbling of the containment regime that was previously in place after the 1991 Gulf War Ceacefire.

Waiting to remove Saddam years later would have only resulted in much higher US and coalition casualties and much higher civilian casualties.

Yeah, we really should have finished the job in 91.

Its easy to say that in hindsite. The world was a very different place in 1991. The Soviet Union still existed and had yet to withdraw its 20 armored and mechanized divisions from the Eastern Part of Germany. If the August 1991 attempt to overthrow Gorbachev had succeeded, the Soviet Union would have continued as would the Cold War.

At the time the USA did not want to become bogged down in the middle east and felt Saddam's defeat was so severe at the time that he would be unable to last another 5 years in power. We would get a new more benign Iraqi government soon, without having to do all the costly heavy lifting involved with nation building. Based on what was known at the time, it was the prudent thing to do.
 
Well, in both cases the United States did not want to see innocent civilians die, but unfortunately that was a result of the United States doing what was a necessity. Removing Saddam became a necessity as well given the crumbling of the containment regime that was previously in place after the 1991 Gulf War Ceacefire.

Waiting to remove Saddam years later would have only resulted in much higher US and coalition casualties and much higher civilian casualties.

Yeah, we really should have finished the job in 91.

Its easy to say that in hindsite. The world was a very different place in 1991. The Soviet Union still existed and had yet to withdraw its 20 armored and mechanized divisions from the Eastern Part of Germany. If the August 1991 attempt to overthrow Gorbachev had succeeded, the Soviet Union would have continued as would the Cold War.

At the time the USA did not want to become bogged down in the middle east and felt Saddam's defeat was so severe at the time that he would be unable to last another 5 years in power. We would get a new more benign Iraqi government soon, without having to do all the costly heavy lifting involved with nation building. Based on what was known at the time, it was the prudent thing to do.

Well, those of us on active duty at the time were not at all happy that we weren't finishing the job. Anymore, because of the left in America, we seldom do a job right the first time. Everything is half-assed. Soviet Union wasn't going to get involved - they had a worse mess than the Obama admin to deal with at home.

The idea that anything worth doing is worth doing right the first time is becoming "just an old saying".
 
Iraq cost us over 4000 American lives, and at least 3 trillion dollars. And for what?

Yeah, ask all those Democratic Congressmen who got us into the war!

You mean because of patriotism and believing Bush's lies?

YOU MEAN CLINTON LIES???

BEFORE BUSH ... When CLINTON was President...
Bush wasn't President I have to remind you till 2001!

"..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
"..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
"Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
"He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger- Clinton National. Security. Advisor 1998
"posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
"Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998
"Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999

IF ANY ONE LIED CLINTON did as HIS ADMINISTRATION PASSED ON the above LIES!!!

Are you saying BUSH should NOT have believed Clinton??? Naw... !!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top