Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You say...he says. I'm goin' with the dude who spent his life studying the subject. No offense.
Once again, Parliament backed down, repealing all but one of the Townshend duties. The prime minister, Lord North, insisted on retaining the tax on tea, determined to underscore Parliament's right to impose direct levies on the colonies. The tea tax was not lucrative; after the costs of collection, it raised very little revenue. But Lord North considered it a vital symbol of imperial authority.
You say...he says. I'm goin' with the dude who spent his life studying the subject. No offense.
he doesn't owe back taxes, Berkshire Hathaway does....there are many many many share holders that owe those taxes if he does not win his appeal....Buffett owe a billion dollars in back taxes sorry chris no sale
he doesn't owe back taxes, Berkshire Hathaway does....there are many many many share holders that owe those taxes if he does not win his appeal....Buffett owe a billion dollars in back taxes sorry chris no sale
Hmmmm....entitlements and handouts.
Entitlements are called as such because people ARE "entitled" to receive the benefits that they've paid their whole lives into.
Handouts (and I'm guessing you mean welfare) eats up less than 1/2 of 1% of tax dollars.
So what's your point again?
And what do you consider a "large number" of "not normal" taxpayers? What's "not normal"?
No, entitlements are called that because a bunch of politicians who are desperate for the deadbeat vote want to make you THINK you're "entitled" to it. I do so love suckers who can't even see when they're being bullshitted and used.
Hmmmm.....why would you think we're NOT entitled to things we've already paid for?
he has many share holders, mainly Big gun brokerage firms, but other individual stock holders too in A and B stocks....he doesn't owe back taxes, Berkshire Hathaway does....there are many many many share holders that owe those taxes if he does not win his appeal....Buffett owe a billion dollars in back taxes sorry chris no sale
it's his he does own it. So yes he does owe back taxes
i think so too....it'll make the stock holders take a second look for certain....Stockholders don't take kindly to poor accounting. Especially when it ends in tax audits and lawsuits. Buffet has screwed BHathaway by the negative attention.
he has many share holders, mainly Big gun brokerage firms, but other individual stock holders too in A and B stocks....he doesn't owe back taxes, Berkshire Hathaway does....there are many many many share holders that owe those taxes if he does not win his appeal....
it's his he does own it. So yes he does owe back taxes
yeah, so? the company owes the taxes....he isn't gonna write a personal check for them ya know....the company, even with that huge tax check written if he loses his appeal, will still end up being profitable...he has many share holders, mainly Big gun brokerage firms, but other individual stock holders too in A and B stocks....it's his he does own it. So yes he does owe back taxes
It's still his company.
yeah, so? the company owes the taxes....he isn't gonna write a personal check for them ya know....the company, even with that huge tax check written if he loses his appeal, will still end up being profitable...he has many share holders, mainly Big gun brokerage firms, but other individual stock holders too in A and B stocks....
It's still his company.
yeah, so? the company owes the taxes....he isn't gonna write a personal check for them ya know....the company, even with that huge tax check written if he loses his appeal, will still end up being profitable...It's still his company.
What I don't get is why a company like BH can owe taxes to the gov't stretching over years but the gov't doesn't go after them for it. They'd be damn quick about coming after me, pretty sure about that. Seems to me we should be slapping interest penalty payments on 'em and throwing people in jail.
You think you can do it?? You think it's easy to run a company??... Start one and prove it
Do you think that a business will be as successful without roads, police or fire protection that ordinary taxpayers provide for that company?
Let me get this straight. By your logic (assuming that businesses pay no taxes), those 45% of Americans who pay no federal income tax should be prohibited from using the roads, police or fire protection that the rest of us are paying for? Is that correct?
No, entitlements are called that because a bunch of politicians who are desperate for the deadbeat vote want to make you THINK you're "entitled" to it. I do so love suckers who can't even see when they're being bullshitted and used.
Hmmmm.....why would you think we're NOT entitled to things we've already paid for?
Why would YOU think people on the entitlement programs have necessarily "paid into" anything at all, or paid in anything like what they take out?
You say...he says. I'm goin' with the dude who spent his life studying the subject. No offense.
No problem.
I'm sure the colonists were mad that British tea was suddenly cheap.
When that happens to me, I get the urge to dress like an Indian and dump tea in the harbor.
