Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Measures of growth are done in percentages, because growth is compounding. Despite whatever numbers sound large to you, the fact remains that President Bush has had below average growth. It's not even a political statement: it's a simple fact that we've had below average growth.
If you were to put all of the Presidents since WWII, and you want to grade them by their economic growth rates, then President Bush is once again performing as a C student, below average. Yet somehow you're sounding like a teenage girl talking about the music greatness of her favorite boy band when you speak of how Bush has handled the economy.
Given what Pres Bush has had to deal with, it is remarkable the state of the US economy
None of the former Presidents had to deal with a $1 trillion blow to the US economy as with 9-11
See, that's better. Now you're acknowledging that we haven't been having "huge economic growth" and you're listing excuses why our growth has been below average. You're saying he's lucky to be making Cs since he had a family tragedy.
Libs have this problem with a proven economic fact - tax cuts causes increased economic growth and generates more revenue to the governement
If it's such a proven fact, then you're saying cutting taxes to $0 per person will bring in more revenue? Let's see how that works out for you.
As for how well of a job Bush did given the circumstances he was in, that's up for debate. I'm no Bush hater, but only Bush lovers like yourself are insisting that we're having "huge economic growth."
Since only 1% of the producers pay 35% of income taxes, how much more do you want from them?
Also, since the top 50% pay 96% of the incomes taxes how much more do you want them to pay?
The Bush haters and the tax increase loving crowd fall back on the 0 tax rate ploy.
Libs and the Bush haters need to read Economics 101
Given the hits the US economy has taken over the last 4 years, the economy is doing very very well.
.
Would you care to elaborate on what you mean by the "0 tax rate ploy." Actually you should review Economics 101, notably the Laffer Curve, because you don't know what you're talking about. Perhaps reality has a well known liberal bias for you
Would you care to elaborate on what you mean by the "0 tax rate ploy." Actually you should review Economics 101, notably the Laffer Curve, because you don't know what you're talking about. Perhaps reality has a well known liberal bias for you
So if the tax cuts are so bad, why is the deficit projected to be in SURPLUS next year?
US Tax Revenues Up 9.7% through four months, Deficit Down 57%; yet Pres Bush does not get any credit
Libs and Bush haters are so quick to bash him over any bad news - but the good news is dismisssed
In fact, more proof tax cuts are good............
This website doesn't seem to indicate that we'll be having a surplus next year:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2007/tables.html
Also, the CBO says that bringing back the tax cuts would have a negligible effect on the Economy, and increase government revenue, and we wouldn't be so much in debt. Basically the nonpartisan CBO says that the only effect the tax cuts are having is to make us more in debt.
