Broward Schools require Obama speech

Mr.Fitnah

Dreamcrusher
Jul 14, 2009
14,480
3,397
48
Paradise.
They dont require the pledge of allegiance or prayer but a momentt with Obama yeah thats required
Dade kids can opt out of speech - South Florida - MiamiHerald.com

Miami-Dade parents will be able to ask schools to keep their kids out of class during President Barack Obama's back-to-school speech Tuesday.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YNz39n9lT8]YouTube - Broward require Obama speech[/ame]

Children in Miami-Dade, Palm Beach and Monroe counties will have the option of not watching President Barack Obama's live back-to-school speech Tuesday, but Broward officials are holding firm on their decision that students should tune in.

Broward will broadcast the president's address live on the district's television station.

``I know that this is a quality teachable moment that we need to capture for our students,'' said Broward Schools Superintendent Jim Notter.

But Miami-Dade schools will not mass broadcast the speech, spokesman John Schuster said. Teachers who wish to show the address will have to use the live stream from the White House website. What students who opt out will do during the 15- or 20-minute speech is up to each school.

The Miami-Dade school district made its decision following a recommendation from its attorney -- and after several dozen parents called or e-mailed Friday objecting to their kids being forced to watch a speech they say could be political.

``The timing, to me, it's not kosher,'' said Sebastian Martinez of Kendall, who is choosing not to let his three kids watch the speech at Auburndale Elementary on Tuesday.

``For the first time, he's getting a downturn in the polls because of the healthcare plan. The timing it seems to me is political, and I don't like the idea of getting our children involved in politics,'' Martinez said.

Parents in Miami-Dade will receive an automated phone call over the weekend asking them to send a note to school Tuesday if they don't want their child to watch the speech.

The Florida Department of Education did not mandate a policy for schools statewide. In a statement, Education Commissioner Eric Smith told each district to decide and called the speech ``a unique opportunity where a sitting president is addressing school-age children across our country.''

CONTROVERSIAL

Tuesday's address will not be the first time a president speaks to children -- or the first time doing so has stirred controversy. A 1991 noontime speech to students by Republican President George H.W. Bush broadcast live on television and encouraging kids to work hard and say no to drugs drew criticism from Democrats in Congress.

In 1988, C-SPAN and an educational network broadcast remarks and a question-and-answer session junior high school students held with President Ronald Reagan, also a Republican -- which included questions about policies like taxes.

Critics of Obama's speech say this time is different because the White House released sample lesson plans for teachers to design activities around the speech.

The White House has since revised some activities, including changing one from writing letters to themselves ``about what they can do to help the president'' to letters about how to achieve educational goals.

Earlier in the week, Jim Greer, chairman of the Republican Party of Florida, issued a statement saying the speech would be using ``taxpayer dollars to indoctrinate America's children to his socialist agenda.''

Greer made appearances Thursday night on cable news shows. Conservative television and radio hosts have kept the issue in the limelight, and some school districts across the country have decided not to show the speech or to let parents opt their children out of it.

The White House has repeatedly said the speech, about personal responsibility and hard work, is nonpartisan and not mandatory. The text of the speech will be available online Monday.

Dade kids can opt out of speech - South Florida - MiamiHerald.com
 
this is such a non issue....it is simply an issue of distraction.



Having the opinion that what ones child is exposed to is a "non issue" is one of the largest reasons for our societies problems. Parents not only need to be informed and involved, but, they need to be proactive!

It doesn't matter if it is the president of the United States or the family next door! Shrugging ones shoulders and saying "whatever" is a major reason we have so many screwed up and lost young people.
 
this is such a non issue....it is simply an issue of distraction.



Having the opinion that what ones child is exposed to is a "non issue" is one of the largest reasons for our societies problems. Parents not only need to be informed and involved, but, they need to be proactive!

It doesn't matter if it is the president of the United States or the family next door! Shrugging ones shoulders and saying "whatever" is a major reason we have so many screwed up and lost young people.

Agreed - parental apathy is one of the primary causes of a society in decline...
 
this is such a non issue....it is simply an issue of distraction.



Having the opinion that what ones child is exposed to is a "non issue" is one of the largest reasons for our societies problems. Parents not only need to be informed and involved, but, they need to be proactive!

It doesn't matter if it is the president of the United States or the family next door! Shrugging ones shoulders and saying "whatever" is a major reason we have so many screwed up and lost young people.

Agreed - parental apathy is one of the primary causes of a society in decline...

Agreed. the message needs to be coming from Parents, NOT the POTUS. He's got other issues he needs to tend to. He needs not be BIG DADDY.
 
the thread header is a fabrication....it says right there in the link, children can OPT OUT so they are not required to listen to it, which the thread header implies?

so, what's the outrage for....?
 
the thread header is a fabrication....it says right there in the link, children can OPT OUT so they are not required to listen to it, which the thread header implies?

so, what's the outrage for....?

that the kids who opt out will be singled out ?
 
the thread header is a fabrication....it says right there in the link, children can OPT OUT so they are not required to listen to it, which the thread header implies?

so, what's the outrage for....?

Because Republicans don't believe in education?

Ducks and runs...



This issue is so fucking retarded its beyond belief. "How dare he tell children to work hard in school!"
 
the thread header is a fabrication....it says right there in the link, children can OPT OUT so they are not required to listen to it, which the thread header implies?

so, what's the outrage for....?

Because Republicans don't believe in education?

Ducks and runs...



This issue is so fucking retarded its beyond belief. "How dare he tell children to work hard in school!"

You know full well that is not the point.
 
the thread header is a fabrication....it says right there in the link, children can OPT OUT so they are not required to listen to it, which the thread header implies?

so, what's the outrage for....?

that the kids who opt out will be singled out ?

i suppose, as easily as the kids who go can be singled out....? btw, who is going to single them out? other students? teachers? singled out for WHAT purpose?

well, maybe it SHOULD BE REQUIRED as it was when i was a child and Carter visited? this opting out crap shows divisiveness instead of courtesy to a sitting president imo.
 
the thread header is a fabrication....it says right there in the link, children can OPT OUT so they are not required to listen to it, which the thread header implies?

so, what's the outrage for....?

that the kids who opt out will be singled out ?

i suppose, as easily as the kids who go can be singled out....? btw, who is going to single them out? other students? teachers? singled out for WHAT purpose?

well, maybe it SHOULD BE REQUIRED as it was when i was a child and Carter visited? this opting out crap shows divisiveness instead of courtesy to a sitting president imo.

it's the same argument that was presented regarding prayer in schools. making kids opt our of prayer was STILL ruled to be evil.
 
You know full well that is not the point.

I thought it was quite obvious that many Republicans were so use to being against education? I mean if there were more educated people, do you honestly think that so many of their policies would fly?

The following are true facts:

Over 60% of people in a poll said the current Health Care Policy Debate is confusing to them. Plus, you know some people probably lied and said they did have a clue. So the number is most likely higher.

As of 2007 for the first # and 1999 for the other two:

30 percent STILL believe Saddam had weapons of mass destruction despite Bush coming out and admitting there were none.

18 percent believe the sun revolves around the Earth.

Only 76% could state which country the U.S gained it's independence from.

And of course, most recently, more then 50% of Republicans believe Obama was not born in the U.S.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RssIN3ustUw]YouTube - Lee Greenwood - God Bless The USA[/ame] - Because we certainly need it.
 
Last edited:
that the kids who opt out will be singled out ?

i suppose, as easily as the kids who go can be singled out....? btw, who is going to single them out? other students? teachers? singled out for WHAT purpose?

well, maybe it SHOULD BE REQUIRED as it was when i was a child and Carter visited? this opting out crap shows divisiveness instead of courtesy to a sitting president imo.

it's the same argument that was presented regarding prayer in schools. making kids opt our of prayer was STILL ruled to be evil.

ahhhhhhhh, the 2 wrongs make it right theory!:eusa_whistle:
 
i suppose, as easily as the kids who go can be singled out....? btw, who is going to single them out? other students? teachers? singled out for WHAT purpose?

well, maybe it SHOULD BE REQUIRED as it was when i was a child and Carter visited? this opting out crap shows divisiveness instead of courtesy to a sitting president imo.

it's the same argument that was presented regarding prayer in schools. making kids opt our of prayer was STILL ruled to be evil.

ahhhhhhhh, the 2 wrongs make it right theory!:eusa_whistle:

no--it's the "pick one and stick with it theory".
 
the thread header is a fabrication....it says right there in the link, children can OPT OUT so they are not required to listen to it, which the thread header implies?

so, what's the outrage for....?

Because Republicans don't believe in education?

Ducks and runs...



This issue is so fucking retarded its beyond belief. "How dare he tell children to work hard in school!"

You know full well that is not the point.

Oh, that's right. All the kids are going to become Democrats! :rolleyes:

Why the **** do people have to make politics out of everything?
 
Oh, that's right. All the kids are going to become Democrats! :rolleyes:

Why the **** do people have to make politics out of everything?

Answer: There are enough people out there who are stupid enough to believe that Obama is truly trying to turn their children into little Stalins. Why that matters? Those stupid people can vote and procreate where they can teach their stupidity to their children.
 
Because Republicans don't believe in education?

Ducks and runs...



This issue is so fucking retarded its beyond belief. "How dare he tell children to work hard in school!"

You know full well that is not the point.

Oh, that's right. All the kids are going to become Democrats! :rolleyes:

Why the **** do people have to make politics out of everything?

Why do politicians feel it's necessary to talk to school kids ?
Do they have some clout that teachers and parents don't ?
 
the thread header is a fabrication....it says right there in the link, children can OPT OUT so they are not required to listen to it, which the thread header implies?

so, what's the outrage for....?
In Broward if the kids skip it's an unexcused absence just like it is when they skip otherwise for no good reason.
 
Why do politicians feel it's necessary to talk to school kids ?
Do they have some clout that teachers and parents don't ?

Are you kidding? Do you think that every single thing a kid does in school should not have any interaction with the outside world? If the President of the United States is not fit to speak to kids, who is? Why bring in a fireman? Why bring in a policeman? Why take kids to the zoo? Why take them on field trips? They can just sit in the classroom all day blissfully learning from textbooks with no examples from the outside. Wouldn't that be great?

I have an idea - let's ban all positive messages about school from anybody who isn't a teacher or a parent. What a great idea. If the President can't speak to kids, then why should anybody at all?

Listening to a positive message from the President of the United States - no matter who that President is - reinforces a message that can do nothing but good for kids, and increases the kids' awareness of civics. How can that possibly be bad?
 

Forum List

Back
Top