British tanks outnumbered by horses...

Well, with America cutting our forces, the British seem not to realize they need to step up...they are cutting their tank, regiments down to one...as the article points out they will now have more horses in service than tanks...

British Army Now Has Fewer Tanks than Horses Thanks to Military Cuts

1 Tank with antipersonal machine gun > any number of mounted calvary on horses :)

In the nuclear age, as was the case with battleships and destroyers, you don't get any additional deterence by having lots of them if your enemy has any nuclear weapons. Britain isn't worried about a tank invasion.
 
I wonder if our mules outnumbered our tanks in the WWII Italian campaign? That was the campaign that some today believe we had only to breeze up those mountains and take over Europe.
 
When the degenerate, taxpayer subsidized Brit monarchy holds up in barricaded mansions pretending that they still live in the 19th century and the most common name for a male child in London is "mohammed" what do you think is going to happen?
 
When the degenerate, taxpayer subsidized Brit monarchy holds up in barricaded mansions pretending that they still live in the 19th century and the most common name for a male child in London is "mohammed" what do you think is going to happen?

Degenerate?
Hmmm.

After 9/11, as NYC was burning, Americans gathered at Buckingham Palace London, seemingly for some kind of reassurance/comfort.

Seeing them there, the Monarch ordered her guards to play the US National Anthem for them...'solidarity'.

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwrX-LN9-L0 [/ame]
 
Tanks?

What are the Brits gonna do with tanks today?
Tanks are oh so 'yesterday'.

They've sent their new ship HMS Dauntless to the Falklands...not one tank in sight;

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7Bq6w49zVs [/ame]


Royal Navy to send HMS Dauntless to Falkland Islands - Telegraph

Dauntless will set sail for the Falkland Islands in the coming weeks armed with a battery of missiles that could "take out all of South America's fighter aircraft let alone Argentina's," according to one Navy source.

The Type 45 destroyer is the most advanced anti-aircraft and anti-ballistic ship in the world equipped with 48 Sea Viper missiles and the Sampson radar, which is more advanced than Heathrow air traffic control

The ship is in a league of its own in air defence able to track dozens of multiple targets

"It can shoot down Argentine fighters as soon as they take off from they bases," said another Navy source. "This will give Buenos Aires serious pause for thought."
 
Last edited:
Well they don't have much to protect now.....

True...and they won't be going on any more crusades to the Muslim world chasing terrorists anytime soon, seems to me.
Think they'll be building "fortress Britain" instead...no need for tanks.

Most of Britain's former colonies are now able to defend themselves...Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Malaysia etc...either by themselves of by pacts with other nations/groups.
NATO, ANZUS etc.

The [British] Commonwealth;

Commonwealth of Nations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The symbol of this free association is Queen Elizabeth II who is the Head of the Commonwealth. The Queen is also the monarch of 16 members of the Commonwealth, known as Commonwealth realms.
The other members of the Commonwealth have different persons as head of state: 32 members are republics and five members are monarchies with a different monarch.

Member states have no legal obligation to one another. Instead, they are united by language, history, culture, and their shared values of democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.[3] These values are enshrined in the Commonwealth Charter[5] and promoted by the quadrennial Commonwealth Games.

The Commonwealth covers more than 29,958,050 km2 (11,566,870 sq mi), almost a quarter of the world land area, and spans all the continents. With an estimated population of 2.328 billion, near a third of the world population,[7] the Commonwealth in 2014 produced a nominal gross domestic product (GDP) of $10.450 trillion, representing 17% of the world GDP when measured in purchasing power parity (PPP) and 14% of the Gross world product when measured nominally. This represents the second largest nominal GDP and third largest GDP PPP in the world.


_________________________________________________
*******************************************

Currently holding the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow Scotland; "The friendly games"


Glasgow 2014 - Commonwealth Games - BBC Sport

Having spent most of 2014 prevaricating before finally committing to compete, Bolt arrived in Glasgow like a hurricane, caused a storm, then ran like the wind to anchor Jamaica to gold in the 4x100m relay.

Handed the baton by Nickel Ashmeade, the 27-year-old six-time Olympic champion was in second place but raced clear of England's Danny Talbot down the final stretch of the Hampden track to win his first Commonwealth medal, wagging his finger as he crossed the line.

The manner in which he enjoyed the celebrations that followed - cavorting around Hampden wearing a tartan bunnet and scarf and wrapped in a Saltire - was a retort to those who scoff at the merit of the event, as was the reaction of Olympic champion Adams after she became the first female Commonwealth boxing champion.


Usain Bolt dances to the Proclaimers to get Glasgow 2014 jumping.



____________
***********

World records are being set in swimming etc.
 
True...and they won't be going on any more crusades to the Muslim world chasing terrorists anytime soon, seems to me.
Think they'll be building "fortress Britain" instead...no need for tanks.

True why fight them in the ME when you can just import them and get more Brits killed, subways blown up, etc., and burn London an other cities down? No need for all that expense in going overseas. That plan is working out so well for the rest of Europe, so jump on the bandwagon. Britain and Europe needs to import a couple hundred million more per country, and rescue them from those evil Jews.
 
Last edited:
True...and they won't be going on any more crusades to the Muslim world chasing terrorists anytime soon, seems to me.
Think they'll be building "fortress Britain" instead...no need for tanks.

True why fight them in the ME when you can just import them and get more Brits killed, subways blown up, etc., and burn London an other cities down? No need for all that expense in going overseas. That plan is working out so well for the rest of Europe, so jump on the bandwagon. Britain and Europe needs to import a couple hundred million more per country, and rescue them from those evil Jews.

Thing is...Pakistan is part of the Commonwealth.
...and Britain is 'secular', 'freedom of religion', 'no discrimination'.

NYC and Boston were blown up...because USA is 'secular', and 'freedom of religion', 'no discrimination'.

"Things would be done differently if I were in charge" - someone once said?
 
Last edited:
When the degenerate, taxpayer subsidized Brit monarchy holds up in barricaded mansions pretending that they still live in the 19th century and the most common name for a male child in London is "mohammed" what do you think is going to happen?

Degenerate?
Hmmm.

After 9/11, as NYC was burning, Americans gathered at Buckingham Palace London, seemingly for some kind of reassurance/comfort.

Seeing them there, the Monarch ordered her guards to play the US National Anthem for them...'solidarity'.

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwrX-LN9-L0 [/ame]

The Brit monarchy is about bloodlines rather than intelligence or integrity. Every monarch from fat Henry on down had some sort of mental or socio-sexual problem. Prince Chuck and Lady Di stand out for their personal problems. It would be fine if they weren't almost entirely supported by hard working taxpayers. Yeah, the band played "The Star Spangled Banner after 9-11 and all those kids named Mohammed are rioting in the streets today against Israel.
 
Why would they have tanks? They can be destroyed or disabled by a single RPG or air strike.

Which is justification for maintaining a very expensive and highly inefficient troop type which hasn't been combat viable since 1914... How, exactly?
 
I wonder if our mules outnumbered our tanks in the WWII Italian campaign? That was the campaign that some today believe we had only to breeze up those mountains and take over Europe.

Don't know about the U.S. forces, but the Free French, Poles, and other units certainly did, on the eastern side of the drive up the peninsula, and the Germans used them extensively on every front all through the war. If the U.S. had many I've never seen the pics. The British Indian sappers and bridge engineers units used a lot of them.
 
Last edited:
True...and they won't be going on any more crusades to the Muslim world chasing terrorists anytime soon, seems to me.
Think they'll be building "fortress Britain" instead...no need for tanks.

True why fight them in the ME when you can just import them and get more Brits killed, subways blown up, etc., and burn London an other cities down? No need for all that expense in going overseas. That plan is working out so well for the rest of Europe, so jump on the bandwagon. Britain and Europe needs to import a couple hundred million more per country, and rescue them from those evil Jews.

Exactly.
Keep those foreign terrorists out...only buy American!!
Domestic terrorism in the United States between 1980 and 2000 consisted of incidents confirmed as or suspected to be terrorist acts. These attacks are considered domestic because they were carried out by U.S. citizens
Domestic terrorism in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
idb How do you buy American when the jobs making things have gone overseas? Even though the businesses made things cheaper the prices never dropped.
If they did bring the jobs back the prices would go up and people would still by the imports because they are cheaper We are high tech now, all you have to do is compare the total bills for watching TV and using the phone to see the advantage of High tech.
 
idb How do you buy American when the jobs making things have gone overseas? Even though the businesses made things cheaper the prices never dropped.
If they did bring the jobs back the prices would go up and people would still by the imports because they are cheaper We are high tech now, all you have to do is compare the total bills for watching TV and using the phone to see the advantage of High tech.

Well...it's a bit off-topic but even if you can't afford these things at least you have liberty and freedom and a free-market!
That outweighs any hardship...surely.
 
Well, UK's main source of income was colonies. Now that the colonies are gone,they just simply do not have resources to maintain large armed forces. It will actually get worse as they run of money they amassed from colonial era loots. It is what it is. One good thing that will come out of this is that we won't have to worry about UK colonizing anybody in foreseeable future. This is a good news for mankind.
 

Forum List

Back
Top