Britain has universal health care, but they just can't get treated...

Discussion in 'Europe' started by 2aguy, Aug 30, 2018.

  1. Flash
    Offline

    Flash Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    14,456
    Thanks Received:
    4,041
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +33,626

    As bad as the VA system is a national single payer health care system in the US would be even worse.

    It would be just like public schools.

    Public education is terrible in the US. It cost a ton of money and produces dismal results and anybody that can afford to do so will opt out and send their kids to a private school even though they are the ones paying for the public schools.

    Socialized medicine in the US would produce a high cost and poorly managed system that the welfare queens would use and anybody that could afford to go to a real doctor would do so even thought they were taxed to pay for the poor system.

    Terrible idea.

    These Moon Bats love the idea of free health care because they think that just because they are alive they are entitled to have somebody else pay for their health care. Despicable, isn't it?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. Pete7469
    Offline

    Pete7469 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2013
    Messages:
    17,292
    Thanks Received:
    3,609
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    The Real World
    Ratings:
    +20,760
    Exactly....

    Think of it this way.

    All the vets in the country account for what??? %5 of the population? %10 at the most.

    If the empire can not even provide adequate service to a fraction of the people, those who signed up to block bullets....


    WHAT CHANCE IN HELL DOES IT HAVE

    TO SERVE 320 MILLION

    FUCKING PEOPLE????


    .
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. task0778
    Online

    task0778 Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2017
    Messages:
    3,515
    Thanks Received:
    783
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Texas hill country
    Ratings:
    +3,509
    Stated differently, UHC effectively means the USA would add somewhere between 25-30 million uninsured people into our health care system, with no additional caregivers or facilities. Of course there's going to be access problems, how could there not be? Of course there's going to be people dying while waiting for treatments, how could there not be? Of course there would have to be some kind of a board or panel that is going to decide what the criteria are for who gets what treatment and who doesn't. [I.E., a death panel.] And if you're going to drastically reduce the pay for the caregivers and limit the prices on drugs, what do you think the consequences will be? Fewer caregivers in the future and fewer innovative new drugs coming online.

    And then there's the additional costs of UHC. You know how those great and wonderful social democracies pay for their UHC? Higher taxes, ON EVERYBODY, not just the rich. Most of them require a VAT tax around 25%, try selling that to the voters.
     
  4. bear513
    Offline

    bear513 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    44,124
    Thanks Received:
    5,724
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +29,158


    Name me one just one government run service that runs better then private ???



    .
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Flash
    Offline

    Flash Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2014
    Messages:
    14,456
    Thanks Received:
    4,041
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +33,626

    The Moon Bats that support single payer really don't give a shit about cost because they think somebody else will pay, not them. Fools!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  6. bear513
    Offline

    bear513 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2012
    Messages:
    44,124
    Thanks Received:
    5,724
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +29,158

    If you think that's bad take a ambulance in Japan with no health insurance, they will just drive you to hospital to hospital ( where you are denied service ) till you die.


    .
     
  7. westwall
    Offline

    westwall Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    56,267
    Thanks Received:
    12,116
    Trophy Points:
    2,180
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +41,030




    Yep. I know. You have insurance for whichever hospital in the prefecture you live. Further the hospitals partner with the universities so the little towns have a very, very hard time getting doctors and nursing staff.
     
  8. SweetSue92
    Offline

    SweetSue92 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2018
    Messages:
    2,249
    Thanks Received:
    549
    Trophy Points:
    150
    Location:
    USA
    Ratings:
    +2,610

    But this is not what foreigners tell Americans, see. They lecture and condescend to us about how wonderful and even moral their system is and how amoral ours is.

    Though to be fair, with the increased troubles of the NHS, their posturing has calmed down a bit--thank GOD.
     
  9. SweetSue92
    Offline

    SweetSue92 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2018
    Messages:
    2,249
    Thanks Received:
    549
    Trophy Points:
    150
    Location:
    USA
    Ratings:
    +2,610
    No, it would be worse. Public education is limited in how bad it is because not EVERY citizen needs it. It varies from actually very good to truly horrendous.

    But if EVERY citizen had to use it, then it truly would be the DMV and worse. For your most delicate health needs. Think on that, Americans.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1

Share This Page