Bring up the cost of young soldiers maimed in Iraq and GOP calls you "unpatriotic"

Discussion in 'Military' started by rdean, Dec 30, 2011.

  1. rdean
    Offline

    rdean rddean

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2009
    Messages:
    60,129
    Thanks Received:
    6,896
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    chicago
    Ratings:
    +14,977
    Finally, although veterans’ care comprises the fourth largest category of government spending, the magnitude of Iraq and Afghanistan veterans’ costs is grossly understated in government projections. There is no provision set aside to cover these future obligations. Given that our pledge to care for veterans is a form of “deferred compensation”, we should appropriate funds for these inevitable long-term costs at the time we budget for the wars in which they will fight.

    Caring for US Veterans | Costs of War

    http://costsofwar.org/sites/default...achments/Lutz US and Coalition Casualties.pdf

    [​IMG]

    Taking all these costs into account, the total budgetary costs associated with providing for America’s war veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan is likely to approach $1 trillion.

    http://costsofwar.org/sites/default/files/articles/52/attachments/Bilmes Veterans Costs.pdf

    Remember back in 2006 when Americans were shocked when told the cost could be a trillion dollars, maybe even two if you include the injuries?

    BUSH REFUSES TO CONFRONT THE TRUE COST OF THE IRAQ WAR

    Bush is seek $439 billion for the defense budget. This doesn't include the cost of the Iraq war, about $120 billion in this year alone. Bush still clings to his beloved tax cuts, and wants to cut spending for every other non-defense item in the budget to pay for them.

    ----------------------------------------------------

    Because of the cost of advanced medicine, the costs today are much higher. Remember when the cost of the Iraq war was a mere 200 billion. The recent estimates are 3 trillion and that's not including the cost of all the veterans maimed in that Republican fiasco. So Republicans were off by a factor of 15.

    Imagine if the cost of taking care of all those maimed veterans is off by a factor of 15, then it could cost 15 trillion. This is a cost that Republicans will blame on Obama. They already are.
     
  2. JoeDirt
    Offline

    JoeDirt Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2012
    Messages:
    14
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +4
    Apparently there's a whole list of things we're not allowed to say anymore without being passed through the all seeing eye.
     
  3. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    Yup.

    The costs of Bush II's two land wars in Asia will continue long after all the boots have left the ground.
     

Share This Page