Brietbart's "pimp" O'keefe's heros not who you might think

[Ravi]

Skip ahead to 11:40 into the broadcast.

Asked who his heros are, O'Keefe says, "G.K. Chesterton, underage prostitutes, Attorney General Gerry Brown and hyperbole and obfuscation."

On The Media

 

[Stephanie]

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

 

[Ravi]

I wonder if he wants to be an under aged prostitute and that is why they are his heros?

 

[Valerie]

I listened to the entire thing earlier and that's not exactly what he said...


Considering the whole point is how he misrepresented things, your OP is actually very funny!

 

[Ravi]

I listened to the entire thing earlier and that's not exactly what he said...


Considering the whole point is how he misrepresented things, your OP is actually very funny!

I was just channeling O'keefe...and yes, the editing was very funny...yet when he does it, people believe him.

Why is that, do you suppose?

 

[Valerie]

I listened to the entire thing earlier and that's not exactly what he said...


Considering the whole point is how he misrepresented things, your OP is actually very funny!

I was just channeling O'keefe...and yes, the editing was very funny...yet when he does it, people believe him.

Why is that, do you suppose?

He's aspiring to be the next Michael Moore...?

 

[Ravi]

I listened to the entire thing earlier and that's not exactly what he said...


Considering the whole point is how he misrepresented things, your OP is actually very funny!

I was just channeling O'keefe...and yes, the editing was very funny...yet when he does it, people believe him.

Why is that, do you suppose?

He's aspiring to be the next Michael Moore...?

Maybe...does Michael Moore dishonestly edit? I've never watched any of his stuff so I don't know.

 

[Valerie]

I was just channeling O'keefe...and yes, the editing was very funny...yet when he does it, people believe him.

Why is that, do you suppose?

He's aspiring to be the next Michael Moore...?

Maybe...does Michael Moore dishonestly edit? I've never watched any of his stuff so I don't know.

He kept saying how they all go by those same standards with changes of scenes and such, misrepresenting things in a way that reminded me of some old Michael Moore stuff I've seen...Manipulating perception just to make a spectacle...

 

[RadiomanATL]

Manipulating perception just to make a spectacle...

Thats a very accurate description of what Moore and Brietbart do.

 

[Ravi]

Val...I hope you aren't saying, "but, but, Michael Moore."

 

[Valerie]

Val...I hope you aren't saying, "but, but, Michael Moore."

Not at all.

 

[Valerie]

I listened to the entire thing earlier and that's not exactly what he said...


Considering the whole point is how he misrepresented things, your OP is actually very funny!

I was just channeling O'keefe...and yes, the editing was very funny...yet when he does it, people believe him.

Why is that, do you suppose?

The way this clown kept reflexively whining about strawmen and obfuscation, he sounded like he'd fit right in here at USMB Who knows why people believe him..

 

[Mr. Shaman]

He's aspiring to be the next Michael Moore...?

Maybe...does Michael Moore dishonestly edit? I've never watched any of his stuff so I don't know.

He kept saying how they all go by those same standards with changes of scenes and such, misrepresenting things in a way that reminded me of some old Michael Moore stuff I've seen...Manipulating perception just to make a spectacle...

....And, now the little bitch is beggin' people to pay-off his credit-card balance.​

"It cost us about $50,000 when all is said and done to produce the NPR video," O'Keefe said. "If you help us raise over $50,000, it will go toward our next video -- after we pay off our credits cards, of course."

Jimmy O'Keefe; Wannabe-Filmmaker/FULL-Time Hu$tler​

 

[Sallow]

He's aspiring to be the next Michael Moore...?

Maybe...does Michael Moore dishonestly edit? I've never watched any of his stuff so I don't know.

He kept saying how they all go by those same standards with changes of scenes and such, misrepresenting things in a way that reminded me of some old Michael Moore stuff I've seen...Manipulating perception just to make a spectacle...

Moore doesn't represent himself as anything other then Michael Moore. And while he is biased and a terrible interviewer, he doesn't out and out lie. Some of the stuff he does is very well done, particularly the research (And yes..he screws that up every once in a while) which is why he is so hated by the right.

O'Keefe and Briebart...lie. They tell untruths..and half truths. And they know exactly what they are doing.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

I was just channeling O'keefe...and yes, the editing was very funny...yet when he does it, people believe him.

Why is that, do you suppose?

He's aspiring to be the next Michael Moore...?

Maybe...does Michael Moore dishonestly edit? I've never watched any of his stuff so I don't know.

It kinda goes like this......

*


*
​

 

[Mr. Shaman]

You 'Baggers need to hook Jimmy O'Keefe up with Christine O'Donnell....FAST!!

SHE knows how to generate income....and, HE can pay-her-off, outta his...

....DILDO-COLLECTION!!!!!