Brietbart to vette Obama even in death.Love Song to Alinsky

On the poster that is in the OP's link . . . it says "Baraka Obama" rather than "Barack Obama"

Are they the same person? If so, why the different spellings of his first name?
 
I can imagine this will stir up a few feathers…and I suspect they are not done either.

*shrugs* this is all just INFORMATION that should have been surfaced when he was running…..


So let me preface my take, and get ahead of the lefty push back which will occur……

1)- he, Obama is free to associate with whomever he pleases, and I am dead serious.

2)- he is free to believe whatever he wishes and espouse such, and again, I am in earnest.

3)- what the believes is not really my issue, I have my opinions and he certainly would not agree with them all, as I don't his.
Really, no ones opinion can be classified as right wrong etc...I mean who are we, you me anyone to say hey, your OPINION is 'wrong'....its not a right or wrong proposition, BUT, as an individual we are all free to make values judgment based on what/how a person thinks and how they conduct themselves. Is this a person I would hang with, be friends with, let watch my children, trust as a president....

That all being said, what we see here is a willfully contrived media travesty, because, as a man running for President, this is the kind of thing that most certainly should have been the focus of a story.

4)- Those who will jump out now and call BS or clamor it means nothing or you just hate obama, well, like it or not your opinion of my opinion like I said, doesn't really mean much, and its just information.....what do you care? WHAT are you afraid of? :eusa_eh:

:eusa_hand:I’ll tell you what you are afraid of, it shows Obama frame of mind or provides insight into his values, and would have reinforced already surfaced stories feeding the opinions of those that don’t agree with re-distributive policy or approve of associations with folks who hold a jaded view of America, you are afraid that that view may be held by a great many more people IF THEY KNEW, there fore you don’t really care about my opinion anyway per se’, you are just protecting Obama from things hes said and done , that are not illegal and purely a matter of individual taste and, individual interpretation…..but, deep donw, you know how a majority of folks would react, so, time to drag out the hate……………….

To bad…….Your argument means exactly zero, there is no defense, I, we, etc. are entitled to make judgments based on values and associations just as you are, I/we are not casting judgment in a sense of right or wrong, but we may ans can cast one in line with our personal opinion/beliefs as it pertains to public office and I would say, don't tell me how to feel about what I see and read, just let me see it and move on.... ......

But here we are 4 years later……………………. The media not only laid down on the job or were asleep at the switch, they bought the bed to sleep in and the kool aid to knock themselves.
 
All of this may be being released a tad prematurely on the part of Breitbart's disciples. Firstly, the LeftMedia will bury this and the rest of what's coming long before November rolls around. Secondly, any of Obama's supporters who finds themselves moved by these releases and has thrown away their KY Jelly supply in response, will likely have backslid and made their way surreptitiously before November into the drugstore via a side or rear entrance and have bought some more of that deliciously slippery substance.
 
Last edited:
It seems that Barry has been associated with Communist and socialist from for quite a while. Heh, who knew?
Here you go:

The Vetting, Part I: Barack's Love Song To Alinsky

As promised the new website Andrew promised is now online, and its purpose is summed up in the First vetting article:

“From today through Election Day, November 6, 2012, we will vet this president--and his rivals.”

This means also that Romney, Coulter,Christie, Coburn et al are going to look like establishment RINOs when this is done**, of course Romney’s deception is already being exposed at:

Romney Supported Federal Individual Mandate In 2009

Let’s face it, the greater the likelihood of a Mitt GOP candidate the greater the chance for Barry to be re-elected but that is a topic for another thread.

Bookmark the Breitbart site, spread the word, and hope the electorate figures out what this election is really all about: whether America will return to its individual liberty roots or continue on the path towards a Marxist statism that has failed over and over to free individuals from, well, anything.

** Of course, there is a good reason for this appearance.

JM
 
Do you CONZ even know what socialism is?
Why don't you look it up and get back here and let us know what you find out.

Perhaps you can give us an example of Socialism that Obama has foisted upon us?
 
Yeah, what's the big deal? BFD if Obama was featured on a panel that discussed how much they love Saul Alinsky. Alinsky was a great man who dedicated his book to "Lucifer", blamed America for all of the worlds problems, and hated Capitalism. What's to be worried about? Those themes will resonate across the fruited plain, right?

I have a feeling there will be plenty more that will come out over the coming months.....:lol:
 
This really sucks

I thought Breitbart would go out with a bang

If that is the best he's got.....that is quite a whimper
 
Yeah, what's the big deal? BFD if Obama was featured on a panel that discussed how much they love Saul Alinsky. Alinsky was a great man who dedicated his book to "Lucifer", blamed America for all of the worlds problems, and hated Capitalism. What's to be worried about? Those themes will resonate across the fruited plain, right?

I have a feeling there will be plenty more that will come out over the coming months.....:lol:

Saul Alinsky didn't "hate capitalism", nor did he "blame America for all the world's problems".
 
Yeah, what's the big deal? BFD if Obama was featured on a panel that discussed how much they love Saul Alinsky. Alinsky was a great man who dedicated his book to "Lucifer", blamed America for all of the worlds problems, and hated Capitalism. What's to be worried about? Those themes will resonate across the fruited plain, right?

I have a feeling there will be plenty more that will come out over the coming months.....:lol:

Saul Alinsky didn't "hate capitalism", nor did he "blame America for all the world's problems".

but it makes such good rants to say that. :dunno:
 
I notice the thread is not getting any 'play'...

I think the Obamabots are hoping it stays off the 1st page...
 
Andrew did not want to re-litigate the 2008 election. Nor did he want to let Republicans off the hook. Instead, he wanted to show that the media had failed in its most basic duty: to uncover the truth, and hold those in power accountable, regardless of party.

The Vetting, Part I: Barack's Love Song To Alinsky

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

intense-albums-intrepid-picture3886-user74-pic23-1307646854-thumb.gif


OMG!!! I can see how this is so Offensive to Liberals!!!

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Breitbart.com has received exclusive tape of an Occupy Strategy Session at New York University, billed as a group talk on “The Abolition of Capitalism.” One of the headline speakers at this session was Stephen Lerner, former leader and International Board Member of the SEIU and frequent Obama White House visitor. Lerner argued in favor of people not paying their mortgages and “occupying” their homes; he spoke in favor of invading annual shareholders meetings to shut them down. But his big goal was to get workers to shut down their workplaces. That’s where the SEIU agenda and the Occupy agenda truly meet: once workers begin to occupy.

Here are the relevant portions of the transcript:

Exclusive: SEIU Helps Occupy
 
This is great. The Obama with his lapdog media can release 20 year old divorce papers on people time to let LOOSE with the DIRT on Obama..

time to fight fire with fire folks..
 
Can someone explain exactly what crimes Alinsky committed?
 
So that's Breitbart's big, shocking surprise?

Obama once went to a play about Saul Alinsky?

Obama later took part in a panel discussion about Alynsky that included the creme de la creme of Chicago's radical Left after the play was over. Even back then, it was noted by the observers, that the women present had orgasms and the men fainted whenever Obama spoke.
I liked the little part where Alynski said he would rather go to Hell when he died than Heaven, because Hell would be filled with the 'Have Nots" of virtue providing him a more target rich environment for his Community Organizing activities.
Do you suppose we could ever get NBC's David Gregory to ask Barack this question during a debate with whomever the Republican Candidate may be when this seemingly endless primary season ends: "Would he (Mr Obama) willingly follow his mentor Saul Alynsky's wishes and directions into Hell also in order to take advantage of the abundant Community Organizing prospects offered by the plentiful "Have nots" of virtue found there?"
 

Forum List

Back
Top