Breeding Nazis in Ukraine, has American Media reported you about that?

[Toddsterpatriot]

What is the "1992 Crimean constitution"?
How is that different from leaving things unchanged?

In 1992, being at odds with national powers, Crimean leaders declared the independence of the peninsula and passed a constitution that proclaimed Crimea to be a republic within Ukraine, provided that Crimean laws would have priority over Ukrainian laws, established Russian as the official language of the territory, and allowed Crimea to conduct its own foreign policy. Following a series of compromises with national Ukrainian authorities, this constitution was repealed, and the Verkhovna Rada (parliament) of Ukraine granted Crimea the status of an autonomous republic within Ukraine and adopted a separate law which defines the jurisdiction of the Crimean authorities. The law allows Crimea to pass its own normative acts provided they do not contradict the laws of Ukraine; adopt a budget and impose local taxes in accordance with the Ukrainian national tax system; implement its own policies in the fields of environmental regulation, social protection, culture, and humanities; and conduct local referendums on questions included in the republic’s jurisdiction.

Crimean History, Status, and Referendum | In Custodia Legis: Law Librarians of Congress

P.S. Crimeans DID NOT want to leave the things unchanged, they have had huge protests against the coup.

So the two choices were leave Ukraine and become part of Russia or be independent.

Why not, "be part of Russia or leave things unchanged"?

 

[Stratford57]

What is the "1992 Crimean constitution"?
How is that different from leaving things unchanged?

In 1992, being at odds with national powers, Crimean leaders declared the independence of the peninsula and passed a constitution that proclaimed Crimea to be a republic within Ukraine, provided that Crimean laws would have priority over Ukrainian laws, established Russian as the official language of the territory, and allowed Crimea to conduct its own foreign policy. Following a series of compromises with national Ukrainian authorities, this constitution was repealed, and the Verkhovna Rada (parliament) of Ukraine granted Crimea the status of an autonomous republic within Ukraine and adopted a separate law which defines the jurisdiction of the Crimean authorities. The law allows Crimea to pass its own normative acts provided they do not contradict the laws of Ukraine; adopt a budget and impose local taxes in accordance with the Ukrainian national tax system; implement its own policies in the fields of environmental regulation, social protection, culture, and humanities; and conduct local referendums on questions included in the republic’s jurisdiction.

Crimean History, Status, and Referendum | In Custodia Legis: Law Librarians of Congress

P.S. Crimeans DID NOT want to leave the things unchanged, they have had huge protests against the coup.

So the two choices were leave Ukraine and become part of Russia or be independent.

Why not, "be part of Russia or leave things unchanged"?

The main question was to stay in Ukraine or not. The people said their NO.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What is the "1992 Crimean constitution"?
How is that different from leaving things unchanged?

In 1992, being at odds with national powers, Crimean leaders declared the independence of the peninsula and passed a constitution that proclaimed Crimea to be a republic within Ukraine, provided that Crimean laws would have priority over Ukrainian laws, established Russian as the official language of the territory, and allowed Crimea to conduct its own foreign policy. Following a series of compromises with national Ukrainian authorities, this constitution was repealed, and the Verkhovna Rada (parliament) of Ukraine granted Crimea the status of an autonomous republic within Ukraine and adopted a separate law which defines the jurisdiction of the Crimean authorities. The law allows Crimea to pass its own normative acts provided they do not contradict the laws of Ukraine; adopt a budget and impose local taxes in accordance with the Ukrainian national tax system; implement its own policies in the fields of environmental regulation, social protection, culture, and humanities; and conduct local referendums on questions included in the republic’s jurisdiction.

Crimean History, Status, and Referendum | In Custodia Legis: Law Librarians of Congress

P.S. Crimeans DID NOT want to leave the things unchanged, they have had huge protests against the coup.

So the two choices were leave Ukraine and become part of Russia or be independent.

Why not, "be part of Russia or leave things unchanged"?

The main question was to stay in Ukraine or not. The people said their NO.

None of the questions allowed no change.

What was Putin afraid of?

 

[Stratford57]

None of the questions allowed no change.

What was Putin afraid of?

If there were no changes then what the West and Ukraine have been bitching about?

Putin was not afraid, he knew the vast majority of Crimeans were dreaming about reunification with Russia. As well as the vast majority of Eastern Ukraine where I live. But Ukrainians don't have balls to hold referendum in our areas.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

None of the questions allowed no change.

What was Putin afraid of?

If there were no changes then what the West and Ukraine have been bitching about?

Putin was not afraid, he knew the vast majority of Crimeans were dreaming about reunification with Russia. As well as the vast majority of Eastern Ukraine where I live. But Ukrainians don't have balls to hold referendum in our areas.

If there were no changes then what the West and Ukraine have been bitching about?

No change was not one of the choices in the referendum.

Putin was not afraid

LOL!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

None of the questions allowed no change.

What was Putin afraid of?

If there were no changes then what the West and Ukraine have been bitching about?

Putin was not afraid, he knew the vast majority of Crimeans were dreaming about reunification with Russia. As well as the vast majority of Eastern Ukraine where I live. But Ukrainians don't have balls to hold referendum in our areas.

Putin bombed buildings in Moscow. That was okay with you?

Why no answer?

 

[Stratford57]

Putin bombed buildings in Moscow. That was okay with you?

Why no answer?

Because it's absurd.

 

[Stratford57]

If there were no changes then what the West and Ukraine have been bitching about?

No change was not one of the choices in the referendum.

People in Crimea were given even more options than Brits on their referendum.

No change would be to stay with Ukrainian Nazis which nobody wanted.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Putin bombed buildings in Moscow. That was okay with you?

Why no answer?

Because it's absurd.

Putin murdered his fellow Russians, that's evil, not absurd.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

If there were no changes then what the West and Ukraine have been bitching about?

No change was not one of the choices in the referendum.

People in Crimea were given even more options than Brits on their referendum.

No change would be to stay with Ukrainian Nazis which nobody wanted.

What are the 5 biggest differences between Nazis and Commies?

 

[Stratford57]

Putin bombed buildings in Moscow. That was okay with you?

Why no answer?

Because it's absurd.

Putin murdered his fellow Russians, that's evil, not absurd.

When and where exactly? Link, please.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Putin bombed buildings in Moscow. That was okay with you?

Why no answer?

Because it's absurd.

Putin murdered his fellow Russians, that's evil, not absurd.

When and where exactly? Link, please.

Russian apartment bombings - Wikipedia

 

[Stratford57]

Russian apartment bombings - Wikipedia

How about all the other radical Muslims' attacks in Russia, why won't Wikipedia blame Putin for them as well? He did not need any presidency, Yeltsin retired on New Year Eve of 2000 and suggested Putin as his temporary sub. Pretty often Wikipedia substitutes facts with conspiracy theories, I didn't see any attempt to prove that alleged story.

The Guardian:
Timeline of Russian terror attacks

June 1995 Chechen rebels seize hundreds of hostages in a hospital in the southern Russian town of Budennovsk. More than 100 people are killed during the assault and a botched Russian commando raid.

January 1996 Chechen fighters take hundreds hostage in another hospital, this time in Kizlyar, Dagestan, and move them by bus to Pervomayskoye on the Chechen border. Most rebels escape but many hostages are killed during a rescue attempt.

September 1999 Bombs destroy apartment blocks in Moscow, Buynaksk and Volgodonsk. More than 200 people are killed. Moscow blames Chechens who in turn blame Russian secret services.

23-26 October 2002 Russian troops storm a Moscow theatre where rebels had taken 700 people captive three days earlier; 129 hostages and 41 Chechen guerrillas are killed. Most of the hostages die from the effects of gas used against the Chechens.

1 August 2003 A suicide bomber driving a truck packed with explosives blows up a military hospital at Mozdok in North Ossetia, bordering Chechnya. Fifty people are killed.

5 December 2003 An explosion tears through a morning commuter train just outside Yessentuki station in Russia's southern fringe, killing 46 people and injuring 160.

6 February 2004 A suicide bombing kills at least 39 people and wounds more than 100 on an underground train in Moscow.

22 June 2004 Rebels seize an interior ministry building in Ingushetia, near Chechnya, and attack other locations. At least 92 people are killed including the acting regional interior minister Abukar Kostoyev.

24 August 2004 Two Russian passenger planes are blown up almost simultaneously, killing 90 people. One Tu-134, flying to Volgograd, goes down south of Moscow. Moments later a Tu-154 bound for Sochi crashes near Rostov-on-Don.

1-3 September 2004 331 hostages – half of them children – die in a chaotic storming of a school in Beslan, after it is seized by rebels demanding Chechen independence.

17 August 2009 A suicide bomber drives a truck into the gates of the main police station in Nazran, the largest city in Ingushetia, killing 20 people and wounding 138 others.

29 March 2010 Moscow suffers its worst attack in six years when two female suicide bombers from Russia's volatile Dagestan region set off explosives on the subway system, killing 40 people.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Russian apartment bombings - Wikipedia

How about all the other radical Muslims' attacks in Russia, why won't Wikipedia blame Putin for them as well? He did not need any presidency, Yeltsin retired on New Year Eve of 2000 and suggested Putin as his temporary sub. Pretty often Wikipedia substitutes facts with conspiracy theories, I didn't see any attempt to prove that alleged story.

The Guardian:
Timeline of Russian terror attacks

June 1995 Chechen rebels seize hundreds of hostages in a hospital in the southern Russian town of Budennovsk. More than 100 people are killed during the assault and a botched Russian commando raid.

January 1996 Chechen fighters take hundreds hostage in another hospital, this time in Kizlyar, Dagestan, and move them by bus to Pervomayskoye on the Chechen border. Most rebels escape but many hostages are killed during a rescue attempt.

September 1999 Bombs destroy apartment blocks in Moscow, Buynaksk and Volgodonsk. More than 200 people are killed. Moscow blames Chechens who in turn blame Russian secret services.

23-26 October 2002 Russian troops storm a Moscow theatre where rebels had taken 700 people captive three days earlier; 129 hostages and 41 Chechen guerrillas are killed. Most of the hostages die from the effects of gas used against the Chechens.

1 August 2003 A suicide bomber driving a truck packed with explosives blows up a military hospital at Mozdok in North Ossetia, bordering Chechnya. Fifty people are killed.

5 December 2003 An explosion tears through a morning commuter train just outside Yessentuki station in Russia's southern fringe, killing 46 people and injuring 160.

6 February 2004 A suicide bombing kills at least 39 people and wounds more than 100 on an underground train in Moscow.

22 June 2004 Rebels seize an interior ministry building in Ingushetia, near Chechnya, and attack other locations. At least 92 people are killed including the acting regional interior minister Abukar Kostoyev.

24 August 2004 Two Russian passenger planes are blown up almost simultaneously, killing 90 people. One Tu-134, flying to Volgograd, goes down south of Moscow. Moments later a Tu-154 bound for Sochi crashes near Rostov-on-Don.

1-3 September 2004 331 hostages – half of them children – die in a chaotic storming of a school in Beslan, after it is seized by rebels demanding Chechen independence.

17 August 2009 A suicide bomber drives a truck into the gates of the main police station in Nazran, the largest city in Ingushetia, killing 20 people and wounding 138 others.

29 March 2010 Moscow suffers its worst attack in six years when two female suicide bombers from Russia's volatile Dagestan region set off explosives on the subway system, killing 40 people.

How about all the other radical Muslims' attacks in Russia

What does that have to do with Putin bombing his own people?

 

[Stratford57]

How about all the other radical Muslims' attacks in Russia

What does that have to do with Putin bombing his own people?

Can you show me the actual proof that it was "Putin bombing his own people" not radical Muslims blowing Russians?

Which one makes more sense to you? Especially, after you saw how many more blow ups there have been in Russia before and after 1999. Or you just hate to drop your "love" to Putin?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How about all the other radical Muslims' attacks in Russia

What does that have to do with Putin bombing his own people?

Can you show me the actual proof that it was "Putin bombing his own people" not radical Muslims blowing Russians?

Which one makes more sense to you? Especially, after you saw how many more blow ups there have been in Russia before and after 1999. Or you just hate to drop your "love" to Putin?

Which one makes more sense to you? Especially, after you saw how many more blow ups there have been in Russia before and after 1999.

The Muslims were the intended scapegoats.

 

[Stratford57]

The Muslims were the intended scapegoats.

Really? Only in Russia or in NY city, Boston, Nice, London, Berlin as well? The intended scapegoats blew up, stabbed, ran over the people there too?

May be Bush ordered to blow up Twin Towers using the intended scapegoats to make it easy to start bombing Iraq, ha? (according to your own logic, I'm NOT responsible for it!)

Do you have an actual proof of your accusations or nothing but blah-blah?

 

[Bleipriester]

For voters he holds big rallies where he ends the wars and regime changes and takes the soldiers back home.

He would do everything he says if Dems were not sticking his wheels constantly.

Sept 29, Russian political talk show “The Great Game” (already interpreted into English), Minute 20
The Great Game. 29.09.2019

Question: Can you say president Trump would like to have better relations with Russia if he could?
Maria Zakharova: They want to have better relations with the whole globe. But all of their efforts are challenges with their issues at home. It’s not about Russia here, American internal political fights require 100% of their efforts and attention. The Trump administration simply has no time or energy for international relation.

Maria Zakharova - Wikipedia

But Trump is President, he can decide.

 

[Stratford57]

But Trump is President, he can decide.

Apparently, he can't. Constantly under some idiotic attacks from Dems.

Russian political talk show “The Great Game” (already interpreted into English) Minute 36
The Great Game. 29.09.2019

Alexey Pushkov: Dems’ goal is to topple Trump. These past two years they’ve been in a non-stop hysteria. They started up with finding a porn star and when that didn’t work they decided to look into allegations of collusions with Russia. They have been investigating that for 2 years, 32.4 million dollars have been spent on the Mueller investigation and at the end Mueller said there was not any sufficient evidence to support the allegation that Trump has colluded with Russia. So, the collusion accusation was off the mark. The narrative that Russia meddled in US election has not gone away but it is getting old, doesn’t touch the nerve any more, it’s not considered to be enough bate any more to catch such a big fish as Trump, he’s off this hook already. Only Hillary Clinton doesn’t seem to leave this topic alone.

So, they invented a new theory. And they appeared to have found that pretext initiating impeachment inquiry, nothing will come out of it of course. There is no doubt the Senate will not give Trump away.

Why are the Democrats are doing what they are doing then? By playing this card they seek to weaken Trump before the elections: the voters will “know” that the president has done something and nobody will look at the substance of the claim and the claim is completely unfounded. Moreover, f Trump chooses the right line of conduct (and I think he might). It’s Biden who will lose the most.

Aleksey Pushkov - Wikipedia

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Muslims were the intended scapegoats.

Really? Only in Russia or in NY city, Boston, Nice, London, Berlin as well? The intended scapegoats blew up, stabbed, ran over the people there too?

May be Bush ordered to blow up Twin Towers using the intended scapegoats to make it easy to start bombing Iraq, ha? (according to your own logic, I'm NOT responsible for it!)

Do you have an actual proof of your accusations or nothing but blah-blah?

Do you have an actual proof of your accusations or nothing but blah-blah?

You don't know what I'm talking about?
Pretending ignorance, or ignorant for real?