Breaking: Two Police Officers Shot Outside Ferguson Police Department

[daws101]

Daws and TK: who made the first affirmation?

That person has to provide something other than opinion, unless it is going to be a "I think"discussion.

tk ass always..

 

[daws101]

why is it conservatives can't distinguish the difference between political parties and the philosophies of liberalism and conservatism.

 

[dannyboys]

Other than making sure that nobody is intimidated from exercising their right to vote, the entire CRA was misguided and actually CAUSES the perpetuation of racial strife we see today. We need to roll back nearly all of it, especially the unconstitutional infringements on free association. Nobody has the right to force a business to offer their services to everyone or hire everyone who wants a job. There's nothing in the Constitution that gives the federal government that right.

This is what we have come to expect from right-wing Christians; fascism.

Yes, because it totally makes sense that more freedom = fascism.

The way y'all talk about black people is no different than the way Nazi's talked about the Jewish people. Direct equivalence.

No, it is not. Nobody is dehumanizing black people. We are simply noting that victimization complex serves nobody. As long as they hold onto to this attitude, they will continue to have problems integrating into their communities.

Do you deny that there is a poverty, lack of father figures and crime problem in the black inner city communities?

I've never understood why so-called "conservatives" are so eager to define people collectively. Why is that?

You really are very fucking stupid.
YOU just defined "conservatives" 'collectively'.

 

[dannyboys]

why is it conservatives can't distinguish the difference between political parties and the philosophies of liberalism and conservatisms

Another fucking stupid LIB. What the fuck does "conservatisms" mean?

 

[daws101]

why is it conservatives can't distinguish the difference between political parties and the philosophies of liberalism and conservatism

Another fucking stupid LIB. What the fuck does "conservatism" mean?

Conservatism as a political and social philosophy promotes retaining traditional social institutions in the context of the culture and civilization. Some conservatives seek to preserve things as they are, emphasizing stability and continuity, while others, called reactionaries, oppose modernism and seek a return to "the way things were".[1][2] The first established use of the term in a political context originated with François-René de Chateaubriand in 1818,[3] during the period of Bourbon restoration that sought to roll back the policies of the French Revolution. The term, historically associated with right-wing politics, has since been used to describe a wide range of views. There is no single set of policies that are universally regarded as conservative, because the meaning of conservatism depends on what is considered traditional in a given place and time. Thus conservatives from different parts of the world—each upholding their respective traditions—may disagree on a wide range of issues. Edmund Burke, an 18th-century politician who opposed the French Revolution but supported the American Revolution, is credited as one of the main theorists of conservatism in Great Britain in the 1790s.[4] According to Quintin Hogg, the chairman of the British Conservative Party in 1959, "Conservatism is not so much a philosophy as an attitude, a constant force, performing a timeless function in the development of a free society, and corresponding to a deep and permanent requirement of human nature
Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality. The former principle is stressed in classical liberalism while the latter is more evident in social liberalism.[1] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas such as democratic elections, civil rights, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free trade, and private property.[2][3][4][5][6]

Liberalism first became a distinct political movement during the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among philosophers and economists in the Western world. Liberalism rejected the notions, common at the time, of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, and the Divine Right of Kings. The 17th-century philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct philosophical tradition. Locke argued that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[7] while adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract. Liberals opposed traditional conservatism and sought to replace absolutism in government with representative democracy and the rule of law.

Prominent revolutionaries in the Glorious Revolution, the American Revolution, and the French Revolution used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of what they saw as tyrannical rule. Liberalism started to spread rapidly especially after the French Revolution. The 19th century saw liberal governments established in nations across Europe, South America, and North America.[8] In this period, the dominant ideological opponent of classical liberalism was conservatism, but liberalism later survived major ideological challenges from new opponents, such as fascism and communism. During the 20th century, liberal ideas spread even further as liberal democracies found themselves on the winning side in both world wars. In Europe and North America, the establishment of social liberalism became a key component in the expansion of the welfare state.[9][10] Today, liberal parties remain a political force with varying degrees of power and influence in many countries throughout the world.

Over time, the meaning of the word "liberalism" began to diverge in different parts of the world. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica, "In the United States, liberalism is associated with the welfare-state policies of the New Deal program of the Democratic administration of Pres. Franklin D. Roosevelt, whereas in Europe it is more commonly associated with a commitment to limited government and laissez-faire economic policies."[11] Consequently in the U.S., the ideas of individualism and laissez-faire economics previously associated with classical liberalism became the basis for the emerging school of libertarian thought.[12]

 

[Geaux4it]

Here's the deal folks. 50 years of violence proves the civil rights movement was a waste of time. Citizenship in The United States requires contribution to fellow citizens, not burden and blame.

Americans have given too much to blacks, there is a reason they were never considered citizens of the U.S. by it's founders.

With that being said Missouri needs to decide whether they want to have police officers standing around like sitting ducks or are they going to crack down. These "protests" are not peaceful, they are a race based extortion attempt to remove Whites from the Ferguson PD. A real problem remains, as soon as Ferguson PD is ethnically cleansed of whites, that will embolden these feral black criminal extortionists to move on to the next White community and ruin it.

Here's the deal folks. 50 years of violence proves the civil rights movement was a waste of time. Citizenship in The United States requires contribution to fellow citizens, not burden and blame.

I don't usually agree with your posts, but I can totally agree with the statement above. The black community needs to stop blaming everyone else for their problems. Their problems are of their own doing with their continued victim status. They will never climb out of their hole with that kind of mindset. NEVER.

Other than making sure that nobody is intimidated from exercising their right to vote, the entire CRA was misguided and actually CAUSES the perpetuation of racial strife we see today. We need to roll back nearly all of it, especially the unconstitutional infringements on free association. Nobody has the right to force a business to offer their services to everyone or hire everyone who wants a job. There's nothing in the Constitution that gives the federal government that right.

This is what we have come to expect from right-wing Christians; fascism.

Yes, because it totally makes sense that more freedom = fascism.

The way y'all talk about black people is no different than the way Nazi's talked about the Jewish people. Direct equivalence.

Nope- No comparison

Jews traditionally are kind of smart

-Geaux

 

[Agit8r]

Here's the deal folks. 50 years of violence proves the civil rights movement was a waste of time. Citizenship in The United States requires contribution to fellow citizens, not burden and blame.

I don't usually agree with your posts, but I can totally agree with the statement above. The black community needs to stop blaming everyone else for their problems. Their problems are of their own doing with their continued victim status. They will never climb out of their hole with that kind of mindset. NEVER.

Other than making sure that nobody is intimidated from exercising their right to vote, the entire CRA was misguided and actually CAUSES the perpetuation of racial strife we see today. We need to roll back nearly all of it, especially the unconstitutional infringements on free association. Nobody has the right to force a business to offer their services to everyone or hire everyone who wants a job. There's nothing in the Constitution that gives the federal government that right.

This is what we have come to expect from right-wing Christians; fascism.

Yes, because it totally makes sense that more freedom = fascism.

The way y'all talk about black people is no different than the way Nazi's talked about the Jewish people. Direct equivalence.

Nope- No comparison

Jews traditionally are kind of smart

-Geaux

And all racists deserve death, whether they wear a uniform or not.

 

[Geaux4it]

Other than making sure that nobody is intimidated from exercising their right to vote, the entire CRA was misguided and actually CAUSES the perpetuation of racial strife we see today. We need to roll back nearly all of it, especially the unconstitutional infringements on free association. Nobody has the right to force a business to offer their services to everyone or hire everyone who wants a job. There's nothing in the Constitution that gives the federal government that right.

This is what we have come to expect from right-wing Christians; fascism.

Yes, because it totally makes sense that more freedom = fascism.

The way y'all talk about black people is no different than the way Nazi's talked about the Jewish people. Direct equivalence.

Nope- No comparison

Jews traditionally are kind of smart

-Geaux

And all racists deserve death, whether they wear a uniform or not.

Careful... You know about those pesky list.... right?

-Geaux

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Other than making sure that nobody is intimidated from exercising their right to vote, the entire CRA was misguided and actually CAUSES the perpetuation of racial strife we see today. We need to roll back nearly all of it, especially the unconstitutional infringements on free association. Nobody has the right to force a business to offer their services to everyone or hire everyone who wants a job. There's nothing in the Constitution that gives the federal government that right.

This is what we have come to expect from right-wing Christians; fascism.

Yes, because it totally makes sense that more freedom = fascism.

The way y'all talk about black people is no different than the way Nazi's talked about the Jewish people. Direct equivalence.

Nope- No comparison

Jews traditionally are kind of smart

-Geaux

And all racists deserve death, whether they wear a uniform or not.

So I'm not being paranoid after all when I say that the demonic Left wants to kill everyone they don't like.


Thanks for proving me right again.