Breaking: Supreme Court Conferring over Obama Eligibility Case Right Now

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by USArmyRetired, Nov 24, 2010.

  1. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +346
    As we speak, the Supreme Court is conferring over the case Kerchner vs Obama. This case is using the 'Vattel Theory' which the framers refered to when framing Article 2 Section 1 for qualifications to be president. I hope we get a answer soon to put all this to rest. Stay tuned for the results which will hopefully be posted afterwhile.


    U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility

    WASHINGTON – Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open?

    The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

    Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.

    "This case is unprecedented," said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. "I believe we presented an ironclad case. We've shown standing, and we've shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There's nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari."

    More of this thrilling story and treachery of Obama in link above:
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2010
  2. Jarhead
    Offline

    Jarhead Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    20,554
    Thanks Received:
    2,348
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,286
    President Joe Biden is not a better alternative.
     
  3. pete
    Offline

    pete The food stamp president

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    1,581
    Thanks Received:
    232
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +232
    At least the security would not be as tight with joe
     
  4. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    Please do keep this up.

    I really dig it.

    Extermists are a zit in the world of politics that need to be popped..once and for all.
     
  5. Sarah G
    Offline

    Sarah G When Nothing Goes Right, Go Left Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2009
    Messages:
    47,686
    Thanks Received:
    11,834
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    NW Ohio
    Ratings:
    +24,039
    World Nut Daily? Probably a lie.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Common Sense
    Offline

    Common Sense BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    915
    Thanks Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +44
    really? the world net daily? can you quote a reliable news source before pandering this BS?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. goldcatt
    Offline

    goldcatt Catch me if you can! Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    10,330
    Thanks Received:
    2,331
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    CentralPA
    Ratings:
    +2,331
    The brainiacs at World Nut Daily ride again....

    Conferences were yesterday. Nothing is happening at the Court today.

    Have a look see for yourself.

    SCOTUSblog
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  8. Common Sense
    Offline

    Common Sense BANNED

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    915
    Thanks Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +44
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2010
  9. goldcatt
    Offline

    goldcatt Catch me if you can! Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    10,330
    Thanks Received:
    2,331
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    CentralPA
    Ratings:
    +2,331
    Just be prepared for some of our humor-challenged posters to take it seriously. ;)
     
  10. USArmyRetired
    Offline

    USArmyRetired BANNED

    Joined:
    May 29, 2010
    Messages:
    2,601
    Thanks Received:
    345
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +346
    Yea right goldcatt. You fail as your continued predeliction for irrelevancy demonstrates. They are having a conference on it today. Go look at the calender again.


    Update.

    A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers

    UPDATE: Tuesday an opinion day : SCOTUSblog

    Search

    No. 10-446
    Title: Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners
    v.
    Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

    Docketed: October 4, 2010
    Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
    Case Nos.: (09-4209)
    Decision Date: July 2, 2010

    ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010)
    Nov 3 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
    Nov 3 2010 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Western Center for Journalism. (Distributed)
    Nov 8 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010.
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2010

Share This Page