Breaking: Supreme Court Conferring over Obama Eligibility Case Right Now

[USArmyRetired]

As we speak, the Supreme Court is conferring over the case Kerchner vs Obama. This case is using the 'Vattel Theory' which the framers refered to when framing Article 2 Section 1 for qualifications to be president. I hope we get a answer soon to put all this to rest. Stay tuned for the results which will hopefully be posted afterwhile.


U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility

WASHINGTON – Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open?

The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.

"This case is unprecedented," said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. "I believe we presented an ironclad case. We've shown standing, and we've shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There's nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari."

More of this thrilling story and treachery of Obama in link above:

 

[Jarhead]

President Joe Biden is not a better alternative.

 

[pete]

At least the security would not be as tight with joe

 

[Sallow]

Please do keep this up.

I really dig it.

Extermists are a zit in the world of politics that need to be popped..once and for all.

 

[Sarah G]

As we speak, the Supreme Court is conferring over the case Kerchner vs Obama. This case is using the 'Vattel Theory' which the framers refered to when framing Article 2 Section 1 for qualifications to be president. I hope we get a answer soon to put all this to rest. Stay tuned for the results which will hopefully be posted afterwhile.


U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility

WASHINGTON – Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open?

The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.

"This case is unprecedented," said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. "I believe we presented an ironclad case. We've shown standing, and we've shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There's nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari."

More of this thrilling story and treachery of Obama in link above:

World Nut Daily? Probably a lie.

 

[Common Sense]

really? the world net daily? can you quote a reliable news source before pandering this BS?

 

[goldcatt]

The brainiacs at World Nut Daily ride again....

Conferences were yesterday. Nothing is happening at the Court today.

Have a look see for yourself.

SCOTUSblog

 

[Common Sense]

can i start quoting the onion?


wait i got it!!!!!!

The Nation is waste deep in soybeans after $30 trillion farm subsidy bill passed!

http://www.theonion.com/articles/nation-waistdeep-in-soybeans-after-30-trillion-far,18422/

 

[goldcatt]

can i start quoting the onion?

Just be prepared for some of our humor-challenged posters to take it seriously.

 

[USArmyRetired]

The brainiacs at World Nut Daily ride again....

Conferences were yesterday. Nothing is happening at the Court today.

Have a look see for yourself.

SCOTUSblog

Yea right goldcatt. You fail as your continued predeliction for irrelevancy demonstrates. They are having a conference on it today. Go look at the calender again.


Update.

A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers

UPDATE: Tuesday an opinion day : SCOTUSblog

Search

No. 10-446
Title: Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners
v.
Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

Docketed: October 4, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-4209)
Decision Date: July 2, 2010

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010)
Nov 3 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 3 2010 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Western Center for Journalism. (Distributed)
Nov 8 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010.

 

[Common Sense]

idiot, there is nothing happening today at the Supreme Court.

there may be a docket because someone filed suit at it made it all the way to the supreme court. this doesnt mean the SC has to listen to this case. They get petitioned thousands of cases of year but only hear argument on very few. if this was a serious matter then there would have been an injunction and Obama wouldnt be the sitting president.

these idiots are claiming that in order to be president you would have had to be been born to two american citizens, not be a native born citizen, over the age of 35 and a resident for the last 14 years. well in order to do this you would need to change the constitution. the current requirement for native born citizenship is to be born on US soil, or have one of your parents be a US citizen.

get a clue. this is a dumb lawsuit with no merit.

 

[marv]

If and when this is ever resolved, it'll be interesting to see what disposition is made of everything he signed in his official status.

 

[Common Sense]

If and when this is ever resolved, it'll be interesting to see what disposition is made of everything he signed in his official status.

itll never be heard before the supreme court.

 

[goldcatt]

The brainiacs at World Nut Daily ride again....

Conferences were yesterday. Nothing is happening at the Court today.

Have a look see for yourself.

SCOTUSblog

Yea right goldcatt. You fail as your continued predeliction for irrelevancy demonstrates. They are having a conference on it today. Go look at the calender again.


Update.

A Place to Ask Questions to Get the Right Answers

UPDATE: Tuesday an opinion day : SCOTUSblog

Search

No. 10-446
Title: Charles Kerchner, Jr., et al., Petitioners
v.
Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

Docketed: October 4, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-4209)
Decision Date: July 2, 2010

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sep 30 2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2010)
Nov 3 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 3 2010 Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Western Center for Journalism. (Distributed)
Nov 8 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 23, 2010.

Uhmmmm...today is Wednesday, November 24 in DC. Don't know where you're at that it's Tuesday the 23d.

IF it was heard in conference yesterday, and it may or may not have been, the decision will already have been reached and the order granting or denying cert will be announced next Orders day which is Monday the 29th. This is not rocket science.

But it sure as you-know-what isn't being debated at this moment. You're literally a day late and a dollar short.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Please do keep this up.

I really dig it.

Extermists are a zit in the world of politics that need to be popped..once and for all.

What no comment on how the Democrats are going to win because of people who keep talking about this type of thing?

 

[jillian]

Uhmmmm...today is Wednesday, November 24 in DC. Don't know where you're at that it's Tuesday the 23d.

IF it was heard in conference yesterday, and it may or may not have been, the decision will already have been reached and the order granting or denying cert will be announced next Orders day which is Monday the 29th. This is not rocket science.

But it sure as you-know-what isn't being debated at this moment. You're literally a day late and a dollar short.

he's also a lunatic who's posted this BS how many times before???

Each year, the court receives approximately 10,000 petitions for certiorari, of which approximately 100 are granted plenary review with oral arguments, and an additional 50 to 60 are disposed of without plenary review

Procedures of the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

nutter is the poster child for why there should be IQ tests before people are allowed to vote.;.... which explains his attachment to the tweeting twit.

 

[JenT]

The WorldNetDaily has the cajones to post what many organizations won't because they're cowards. Love those guys.



and I've read this at other newsites too

 

[goldcatt]

Uhmmmm...today is Wednesday, November 24 in DC. Don't know where you're at that it's Tuesday the 23d.

IF it was heard in conference yesterday, and it may or may not have been, the decision will already have been reached and the order granting or denying cert will be announced next Orders day which is Monday the 29th. This is not rocket science.

But it sure as you-know-what isn't being debated at this moment. You're literally a day late and a dollar short.

he's also a lunatic who's posted this BS how many times before???

Each year, the court receives approximately 10,000 petitions for certiorari, of which approximately 100 are granted plenary review with oral arguments, and an additional 50 to 60 are disposed of without plenary review

Procedures of the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

nutter is the poster child for why there should be IQ tests before people are allowed to vote.;.... which explains his attachment to the tweeting twit.

I wasn't going to burst his little bubble.

It's so much more satisfying to wait till Monday and say "I told you so".

 

[JenT]

The BIG question is, if Obama goes bust, what does that do to his SCOTUS picks?

 

[MaggieMae]

As we speak, the Supreme Court is conferring over the case Kerchner vs Obama. This case is using the 'Vattel Theory' which the framers refered to when framing Article 2 Section 1 for qualifications to be president. I hope we get a answer soon to put all this to rest. Stay tuned for the results which will hopefully be posted afterwhile.


U.S. Supreme Court confers on Obama eligibility

WASHINGTON – Is this the case that will break the presidential eligibility question wide open?

The Supreme Court conferred today on whether arguments should be heard on the merits of Kerchner v. Obama, a case challenging whether President Barack Obama is qualified to serve as president because he may not be a "natural-born citizen" as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Unlike other eligibility cases that have reached the Supreme Court, Kerchner vs. Obama focuses on the "Vattel theory," which argues that the writers of the Constitution believed the term "natural-born citizen" to mean a person born in the United States to parents who were both American citizens.

"This case is unprecedented," said Mario Apuzzo, the attorney bringing the suit. "I believe we presented an ironclad case. We've shown standing, and we've shown the importance of the issue for the Supreme Court. There's nothing standing in their way to grant us a writ of certiorari."

More of this thrilling story and treachery of Obama in link above:

Scroll down a tad and check the calendar, stupid. This crap never got any further than getting a number stamped on the big cardboard box it was delivered in.

Supreme Court of the United States