Breaking Reuters Poll Alert: Hillary Clinton's 12 Point Lead Over Trump Implodes

[NYcarbineer]

You left out this part of the Reuters article:

"The States of the Nation, released on Wednesday, estimated that if the election were held now Clinton would have a 95 percent chance of winning by a margin of about 108 votes in the Electoral College, the body that decides the election through a count of the candidates' wins in each state."

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

You left out this part of the Reuters article:

"The States of the Nation, released on Wednesday, estimated that if the election were held now Clinton would have a 95 percent chance of winning by a margin of about 108 votes in the Electoral College, the body that decides the election through a count of the candidates' wins in each state."

Because it's not plausible.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You left out this part of the Reuters article:

"The States of the Nation, released on Wednesday, estimated that if the election were held now Clinton would have a 95 percent chance of winning by a margin of about 108 votes in the Electoral College, the body that decides the election through a count of the candidates' wins in each state."

Because it's not plausible.

The polls in the last few days before an election are very accurate, so yes, if the election were held now, the state polls showing Clinton leading would reflect the election results in an overwhelming majority,

and currently, the state polls have Clinton winning 362 electoral votes.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You left out this part of the Reuters article:

"The States of the Nation, released on Wednesday, estimated that if the election were held now Clinton would have a 95 percent chance of winning by a margin of about 108 votes in the Electoral College, the body that decides the election through a count of the candidates' wins in each state."

Because it's not plausible.

So you agree with the Reuters part you like, but the part you don't like HAS to be flawed.

Classic partisan derangement.

 

[leftwinger]

What is going to motivate PHI AA vote this time? Pennsylvania will be needed by Trump. Do you think AA will rush out to vote for her? Like the 100% Obama got?

I would not be excited to rush out and vote for hrc? Boring, corrupt, dishonest, lifetime in politics game, dead bodies.

Trump has not said, cut off checks. He has said jobs. He has wirked, hired, fired, paid, filed.....all of it. Hrc=none.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

You left out this part of the Reuters article:

"The States of the Nation, released on Wednesday, estimated that if the election were held now Clinton would have a 95 percent chance of winning by a margin of about 108 votes in the Electoral College, the body that decides the election through a count of the candidates' wins in each state."

Because it's not plausible.

The polls in the last few days before an election are very accurate, so yes, if the election were held now, the state polls showing Clinton leading would reflect the election results in an overwhelming majority,

and currently, the state polls have Clinton winning 362 electoral votes.

In reality, these are not the last days of the election. Your post is invalid.