Breaking Previous Pledge, Democrats Won’t Disclose Convention Donors

Discussion in 'Politics' started by beretta304, Aug 23, 2012.

  1. beretta304
    Offline

    beretta304 BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2012
    Messages:
    8,664
    Thanks Received:
    73
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    A Saner Place
    Ratings:
    +73
    Breaking Previous Pledge, Democrats Won’t Disclose Convention Donors Until October; WaPo Buries Story
    By Ryan Robertson | August 22, 2012 | 19:29



    The so-called “people’s convention” is scheduled to commence on Labor Day in Charlotte, but the “most open and accessible (convention) ever”
    Despite an earlier vow to reveal all contributors, Democratic officials are now refusing to do so until federal disclosure documents have to be filed in mid-October.

    To its credit, the Washington Post recognized the humorous contradiction and a shameless double standard by running this story in the August 22 print edition. Unfortunately, the liberal-leaning paper buried T.W. Farnum’s report on A7.


    The front page included a story about Facebook’s IPO debacle, and a fond farewell to a deceased homeless man who suffered from schizophrenia. Granted, both were interesting but hardly front page-worthy. The dominant story was “Akin refuses to quit race: Senate candidate says he’ll focus on abortion.”

    The Post found room for an article on a matter of embarrassment for Republicans, but not a corresponding story that makes Democrats look bad by exposing their hypocrisy.

    Farnum pointed out right away that this is the same party that petitioned conservative interest groups to reveal their own donor lists, and the same administration that keeps criticizing Mitt Romney for not releasing more tax returns.
    He even cited a recent e-mail from Obama’s campaign supervisor Jim Messina that petitioned for more honesty and integrity on the conservative side. “They have a vested interest in being able to spend millions anonymously to influence our elections,” he wrote.

    This was before Charlotte's host committee had to remove self-righteous language from its website that patted itself on the back for being more honest and upfront than the GOP. Liberal critics may have slammed Republicans for their corporate fundraising, but they never made the same sanctimonious promises the Democrats did on the matter.
    Fortunately for the Democrats, their allies in the liberal media will largely ignore the story, or report the matter but keep it from being as big of a story as it could’ve otherwise been.





    Read more: Breaking Previous Pledge, Democrats Won
     
  2. SniperFire
    Offline

    SniperFire Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    13,627
    Thanks Received:
    1,219
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Inside Your Head
    Ratings:
    +1,223
    ( insert shocked face)
     
  3. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,130
    Thanks Received:
    10,160
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,676
    fuck the demoncraps. I'm voting for two white Republicans.
     
  4. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    Why..exactly..should they?

    There isn't a law..and it would put them at a distinct disadvantage.

    It's like saying "Democrats broke their promise by bringing a gun to a gunfight".
     
  5. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    29,281
    Thanks Received:
    4,000
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,915
    But they initially said they were not bringing a gun to a gunfight. Changing thier minds makes them smart, but still liars.
     

Share This Page