Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
None of those 25 countries has fought a major war, (WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam) since allowing homos to serve.No, it's cotton pickin good that we don't have gays to serve. They are demoralizing to the welfare of the military and nation.
It isn't a problem for the 25 other countries, some that are our allies in both wars.
I guess we can fight with gay englishman, but not gay americans.
So openly faggot soldiers have Not been tested in real combat situations.
Vietnam 70-71None of those 25 countries has fought a major war, (WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam) since allowing homos to serve.It isn't a problem for the 25 other countries, some that are our allies in both wars.
I guess we can fight with gay englishman, but not gay americans.
So openly faggot soldiers have Not been tested in real combat situations.
Yea, but Gay men and Women have been tested in real combat situations. Have you?
Open U.S. sodomite soldiers are untested in combat.
Open homo soldiers would negatively affect the unit cohesion and moral of the normal soldiers around them.Open U.S. sodomite soldiers are untested in combat.
Them being open or in the closet really, in your estimation, would effect their Combat Skills?
This is excellent news. The Military is alot stronger without queers, It is very demoralizing for the troops to have gays openly serve.
Sarah Palin is one who understand's this and knows that our military needs to be as strong as it can be to deter any threats.
Show me a soldier who gets fired for mentioning that they are straight and then you can tell me they are being treated equally.This is excellent news. The Military is alot stronger without queers, It is very demoralizing for the troops to have gays openly serve. Sarah Palin is one who understand's this and knows that our military needs to be as strong as it can be to deter any threats. Obama on the other hand doesn't since he had a affair with Larry Sinclair, a openly homosexual.
Call me stupid, but if they can serve bravely without anyone knowing they're gay why can't they do it openly? I know I'm simple but I don't get it. They just need to open the barracks up and go bi-sexual then everyone is happy. Everyone.
Willow, the simple fact is that BOTH sides are making this into a bigger deal than it is.
On one side you have the idiots who think that allowing gays to openly serve is suddenly going to result in an influx of "flamers" who are going to be wearing pink cammies and drooling after every guy they see. These folks refuse to recognize that the UCMJ has adequate penalties to deter anyone from acting in a manner which reflects badly on the military whether they be gay or straight.
On the other side you have the idiots who refuse to acknowledge the very real fact that no one is being persecuted by being asked to keep their gayness to themselves. The fact is most people don't want their buddies heterosexualness thrown in their faces either. So they are treating gays as equals in that regards.
Show me a soldier who gets fired for mentioning that they are straight and then you can tell me they are being treated equally.Call me stupid, but if they can serve bravely without anyone knowing they're gay why can't they do it openly? I know I'm simple but I don't get it. They just need to open the barracks up and go bi-sexual then everyone is happy. Everyone.
Willow, the simple fact is that BOTH sides are making this into a bigger deal than it is.
On one side you have the idiots who think that allowing gays to openly serve is suddenly going to result in an influx of "flamers" who are going to be wearing pink cammies and drooling after every guy they see. These folks refuse to recognize that the UCMJ has adequate penalties to deter anyone from acting in a manner which reflects badly on the military whether they be gay or straight.
On the other side you have the idiots who refuse to acknowledge the very real fact that no one is being persecuted by being asked to keep their gayness to themselves. The fact is most people don't want their buddies heterosexualness thrown in their faces either. So they are treating gays as equals in that regards.
Show me a soldier who gets fired for mentioning that they are straight and then you can tell me they are being treated equally.Willow, the simple fact is that BOTH sides are making this into a bigger deal than it is.
On one side you have the idiots who think that allowing gays to openly serve is suddenly going to result in an influx of "flamers" who are going to be wearing pink cammies and drooling after every guy they see. These folks refuse to recognize that the UCMJ has adequate penalties to deter anyone from acting in a manner which reflects badly on the military whether they be gay or straight.
On the other side you have the idiots who refuse to acknowledge the very real fact that no one is being persecuted by being asked to keep their gayness to themselves. The fact is most people don't want their buddies heterosexualness thrown in their faces either. So they are treating gays as equals in that regards.
Learn to read, I didn't say they were treated equally by the military, I said they were treated equally in ONE single respect, by their peers.
Show me a soldier who gets fired for mentioning that they are straight and then you can tell me they are being treated equally.
Learn to read, I didn't say they were treated equally by the military, I said they were treated equally in ONE single respect, by their peers.
Sorry.
Best decision I heard, good jobHow very sad.
Because the military knows they need to leave their sex habits at home in the clost and not force them on the rest of us, the dirty pukesThis is excellent news. The Military is alot stronger without queers, It is very demoralizing for the troops to have gays openly serve. Sarah Palin is one who understand's this and knows that our military needs to be as strong as it can be to deter any threats. Obama on the other hand doesn't since he had a affair with Larry Sinclair, a openly homosexual.
Call me stupid, but if they can serve bravely without anyone knowing they're gay why can't they do it openly? I know I'm simple but I don't get it. They just need to open the barracks up and go bi-sexual then everyone is happy. Everyone.
Stop using the Lords name in vain, for it is the Lord that condems homosexuality.
No, it's cotton pickin good that we don't have gays to serve. They are demoralizing to the welfare of the military and nation.
No, anyone who serves has a pair. It's just your insecurity about someone being "different" that demoralizes ME, as a MAN, that my fellow MEN, are such insecure fucking pussies.
What's a gay guy who's willing to die for you, going to do? Bite you? Booh! Jesus fucking christ you're lame.
Because the military knows they need to leave their sex habits at home in the clost and not force them on the rest of us, the dirty pukesThis is excellent news. The Military is alot stronger without queers, It is very demoralizing for the troops to have gays openly serve. Sarah Palin is one who understand's this and knows that our military needs to be as strong as it can be to deter any threats. Obama on the other hand doesn't since he had a affair with Larry Sinclair, a openly homosexual.
Call me stupid, but if they can serve bravely without anyone knowing they're gay why can't they do it openly? I know I'm simple but I don't get it. They just need to open the barracks up and go bi-sexual then everyone is happy. Everyone.
The only combat a faggot sees is between the sheets, pussy.None of those 25 countries has fought a major war, (WWI, WWII, Korea, Vietnam) since allowing homos to serve.It isn't a problem for the 25 other countries, some that are our allies in both wars.
I guess we can fight with gay englishman, but not gay americans.
So openly faggot soldiers have Not been tested in real combat situations.
Yea, but Gay men and Women have been tested in real combat situations. Have you? Pussy.
I am not weak, I just believe someones sexuality needs to stay at home, same goes for normal people.Because the military knows they need to leave their sex habits at home in the clost and not force them on the rest of us, the dirty pukesCall me stupid, but if they can serve bravely without anyone knowing they're gay why can't they do it openly? I know I'm simple but I don't get it. They just need to open the barracks up and go bi-sexual then everyone is happy. Everyone.
Yes because someone telling you they're gay is totally forcing their sexuality onto you.
If you honestly can't handle the knowledge that a co-worker is gay then you are incredibly weak.
