NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
lol, if Bobby Jindal had his way, there wouldn't be a Court to make this decision.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh look, the unelected tyranny judges just got a stay of execution from the Right.
All this decision required is that the EPA take cost into consideration with regards to mercury regulations earlier in the process. It was not the creation of a right out of thin air, or ignoring the actual letter of the law for "intentions, nor as in the most recent decision, deciding "people" = "legislature.
The Court wrote a law. They wrote a law against the EPA doing what it did.
Oh look, the unelected tyranny judges just got a stay of execution from the Right.
All this decision required is that the EPA take cost into consideration with regards to mercury regulations earlier in the process. It was not the creation of a right out of thin air, or ignoring the actual letter of the law for "intentions, nor as in the most recent decision, deciding "people" = "legislature.
I thought all of our rights were the creation of the Creator. How could the SCOTUS have created a right?
Oh look, the unelected tyranny judges just got a stay of execution from the Right.
All this decision required is that the EPA take cost into consideration with regards to mercury regulations earlier in the process. It was not the creation of a right out of thin air, or ignoring the actual letter of the law for "intentions, nor as in the most recent decision, deciding "people" = "legislature.
I thought all of our rights were the creation of the Creator. How could the SCOTUS have created a right?
They created a constitutionally protected "right", something that can only be done via amendment.
There is a difference between intrinsic rights, and protected rights.
Oh look, the unelected tyranny judges just got a stay of execution from the Right.
All this decision required is that the EPA take cost into consideration with regards to mercury regulations earlier in the process. It was not the creation of a right out of thin air, or ignoring the actual letter of the law for "intentions, nor as in the most recent decision, deciding "people" = "legislature.
I thought all of our rights were the creation of the Creator. How could the SCOTUS have created a right?
They created a constitutionally protected "right", something that can only be done via amendment.
There is a difference between intrinsic rights, and protected rights.
something california should have considered when their version of the EPA makes a ruling.....Imagine that. Considering the cost and impact of a regulation.
jindal is just another in long line of dipshits wanting to rule the country....lol, if Bobby Jindal had his way, there wouldn't be a Court to make this decision.
Just coming in...5-4 vote against Obama. Finally, a decent decision from the SCOTUS which requires the EPA to assess the costs of regulations.
This puts some brakes on Obama's Climate Change takeover of the Economy.
Oh look, the unelected tyranny judges just got a stay of execution from the Right.
All this decision required is that the EPA take cost into consideration with regards to mercury regulations earlier in the process. It was not the creation of a right out of thin air, or ignoring the actual letter of the law for "intentions, nor as in the most recent decision, deciding "people" = "legislature.
The Court wrote a law. They wrote a law against the EPA doing what it did.
No, they didn't.
Oh look, the unelected tyranny judges just got a stay of execution from the Right.
All this decision required is that the EPA take cost into consideration with regards to mercury regulations earlier in the process. It was not the creation of a right out of thin air, or ignoring the actual letter of the law for "intentions, nor as in the most recent decision, deciding "people" = "legislature.
The Court wrote a law. They wrote a law against the EPA doing what it did.
No, they didn't.
Then stop calling everything else legislating from the bench nitwit.