Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So F-ing WHAT? The MWP was not caused by human GHG emissions. The MWP's temperature did not rise 1C in 100 years.
So, have you admitted that your Principia Scientific post contending that Mann's lawsuit had failed and that he had gone bankrupt was nothing more than a collection of lies?
If not, why not?
Are you going to use Principia Scientific as a reference in the future? Do you have any comment to make about John Sullivan's psychopathic lying and likely paedophilic tendencies?
If not, why not?
Over 9,000 US PHd Scientists call BS on "consensus" >>>>
Global Warming Petition Project
Of course, to the k00ks, they are fake scientists!!!
I love delingpole to death. I am so so glad he is out there
Quoting "Cook et al, 2013" just gets you laughed at GoldiRocks..
This just in: America still has that free speech thingamajig.
Besides that, what makes you think the chances that Mann turns over the metadata for inspection in America, are any better than in Canada?
Just as long as you stay away from Marpi Point, O.K.?This just in: America still has that free speech thingamajig.
Despite your best efforts, yes. After all, the denialists here are the ones literally demanding jail for a scientist because he did science that doesn't agree with their political party. Denialists are shockingly similar to the Lysenkoists of the old Soviet Union. Lysenkoism was crap pseudoscience genetics, but it had the official approval of TheParty, so it was either embrace it or go to jail. And just like the Lysenkoists, you denialists fabricate stories about how the offending scientists are actually criminals and EnemiesOfTheState.
Besides that, what makes you think the chances that Mann turns over the metadata for inspection in America, are any better than in Canada?
He did turn it over, long ago.
We keep trying to tell you that your kiddie-fiddler source simply made up a crazy story. Alas, your cult says you are not allowed to admit that, hence you won't.
So, have you admitted that your Principia Scientific post contending that Mann's lawsuit had failed and that he had gone bankrupt was nothing more than a collection of lies?
If not, why not?
Are you going to use Principia Scientific as a reference in the future? Do you have any comment to make about John Sullivan's psychopathic lying and likely paedophilic tendencies?
If not, why not?
Over 9,000 US PHd Scientists call BS on "consensus" >>>>
Global Warming Petition Project
Of course, to the k00ks, they are fake scientists!!!
Over 31,000 scientists signed the OISM Petition Project
32,000 Sounds Like A Lot
In fact, OISM signatories represent a tiny fraction (~0.3%) of all US science graduates (petition cards were only sent to individuals within the U.S)
According to figures from the US Department of Education Digest of Education Statistics: 2008, 10.6 million science graduates have gained qualifications consistent with the OISM polling criteria since the 1970-71 school year. 32,000 out of 10 million is not a very compelling figure, but a tiny minority - approximately 0.3 per cent.
There are many issues casting doubt on the validity of this petition. On investigation, attempts to undermine the scientific consensus on climate change often appear to have ideological roots, vested business interests or political sponsors. The claims made for the OISM petition do not withstand objective scrutiny, and the assertions made in the petition are not supported by evidence, data or scientific research.
Several studies conducted independently (Oreskes 2004, Oreskes 2007, Doran and Zimmerman (2009), Anderegg et al. (2010), Cook et. al., 2013) have shown that 97% of climate scientists agree that humans are causing the climate to change, and that anthropogenic greenhouse gases are causing global changes to the climate. These views form the scientific consensus on climate change.
No doubt great news for Mark Steyn and NRO.
