Breaking: Black Panthers Headed Back To Poll Stations to Monitor Them

Oh my goodness, the righties have their pictures of guns out. Ooooo, I'm sooooo scared. How do these neanderthalls advocate that we counter made up voter intimidation? Why with real intimidation!

Do y'all see black panters under your beds and imagine them hiding in your closets?

Maybe we should get y'all some night lights.

That is just the point. IF you think the black panthers are made up intimidation then the kkk would be the same made up intimation.

Double standard much?

What exactly does one thing have to do with the other? IMHO the KKK should be labeled a terrorist organization, heck, they've been involved in enough actions.

They are not.

And they are not at all limited in doing anything.
 
Oh my goodness, the righties have their pictures of guns out. Ooooo, I'm sooooo scared. How do these neanderthalls advocate that we counter made up voter intimidation? Why with real intimidation!

Do y'all see black panters under your beds and imagine them hiding in your closets?

Maybe we should get y'all some night lights.

That is just the point. IF you think the black panthers are made up intimidation then the kkk would be the same made up intimation.

Double standard much?
You'll take the left's double standards when you pry them from their cold, dead fingers.
 
Just because we did not vote for the idiot in charge doen't mean we have nothing coming. WE JUST KNEW BETTER.

Yeah, that is exactly what that means. When I pay the gardener to cut my lawn, it doesn't mean he is coming by your house and cut your lawn. Obama owes you nothing.
 
I'd expect the DOJ to do the same as they are here:

Justice Department to Send Election Observers to Arizona as Concern Rises About Illegal Voters - FoxNews.com

Justice Department to Send Election Observers to Arizona as Concern Rises About Illegal Voters

By Stephen Clark

Published October 30, 2010 | FoxNews.com

advertisement

The Justice Department is sending a small pack of election observers to Arizona as Hispanic groups sound the alarm over an anti-illegal immigration group's mass e-mail seeking to recruit Election Day volunteers to help block illegal immigrants from voting.

Hispanic voting rights groups say the e-mail is just an attempt to intimidate minority voters. But election fraud monitors say that there are hundreds of examples of duplicate registrations, wrong information and past unregistered voters getting ballots.

Voter fraud allegations have emerged just days before the midterm in many crucial battleground states across the country, including Nevada, Pennsylvania and Florida.

The Justice Department announced Friday it would deploy more than 400 federal observers to 30 jurisdictions in 18 states ahead of Tuesday's election. But Arizona officials say the department had already committed to sending observers to their state.

Justice Department officials had notified Maricopa County that they would send a "handful" of election observers, even before the e-mail was sent, Matthew Benson, a spokesman for Arizona's secretary of state, told FoxNews.com...
 
Oh my goodness, the righties have their pictures of guns out. Ooooo, I'm sooooo scared. How do these neanderthalls advocate that we counter made up voter intimidation? Why with real intimidation!

Do y'all see black panters under your beds and imagine them hiding in your closets?

Maybe we should get y'all some night lights.

That is just the point. IF you think the black panthers are made up intimidation then the kkk would be the same made up intimation.

Double standard much?

What exactly does one thing have to do with the other? IMHO the KKK should be labeled a terrorist organization, heck, they've been involved in enough actions.

They are not.

And they are not at all limited in doing anything.



So you are saying that the KKK would be voter intimidation? Good

I see baton carrying black panther thugs as voter intimidation as well.
 
What exactly would be a good remedy for this?

Hanging?

Execution?

Just wondering.

Enforcement of the Voting Rights Act.

And what exactly do you propose?

Life without parole?

These guys were barred from carrying their nightsticks to polls. They were also detained by authorities.

So..if that was not enough..what sort of penalty should have been metted out? And exactly how would one going about prosecuting with no complaints?

The Voting rights act spells out penalties.

Do you want to repeal the Voting Rights Act, or just selectively enforce it?
 
That is just the point. IF you think the black panthers are made up intimidation then the kkk would be the same made up intimation.

Double standard much?

What exactly does one thing have to do with the other? IMHO the KKK should be labeled a terrorist organization, heck, they've been involved in enough actions.

They are not.

And they are not at all limited in doing anything.



So you are saying that the KKK would be voter intimidation? Good

I see baton carrying black panther thugs as voter intimidation as well.

Um..

Again..the KKK are "limited" in doing anything. If they should up to polling places in white sheets..they can probably expect the same treatment..soup to nuts.

Once it was established someone had a problem with this idiots..they were escorted from the area, and an injuction was issued against them, barring them from carrying batons to polling areas. However, there were no complaints about voter intimidation from anyone voting in those stations.

So..what more do you think should be done?

What "sentence" would be appropriate?
 
Yeah, dead hispanics are gonna do voter fraud and black peole are gonna intimidate poor, helpless whites at the polls.

Nothing racist going on here at FOX. Michelle Malkin is a good person.

Night lights, that's the answer.
 
What exactly does one thing have to do with the other? IMHO the KKK should be labeled a terrorist organization, heck, they've been involved in enough actions.

They are not.

And they are not at all limited in doing anything.



So you are saying that the KKK would be voter intimidation? Good

I see baton carrying black panther thugs as voter intimidation as well.

Um..

Again..the KKK are "limited" in doing anything. If they should up to polling places in white sheets..they can probably expect the same treatment..soup to nuts.

Once it was established someone had a problem with this idiots..they were escorted from the area, and an injuction was issued against them, barring them from carrying batons to polling areas. However, there were no complaints about voter intimidation from anyone voting in those stations.

So..what more do you think should be done?

What "sentence" would be appropriate?

There doesn't need to be complaints by voters in order for there to be a violation of the Voting Rights Act.
 
Enforcement of the Voting Rights Act.

And what exactly do you propose?

Life without parole?

These guys were barred from carrying their nightsticks to polls. They were also detained by authorities.

So..if that was not enough..what sort of penalty should have been metted out? And exactly how would one going about prosecuting with no complaints?

The Voting rights act spells out penalties.

Do you want to repeal the Voting Rights Act, or just selectively enforce it?

Feel free.

I am ignorant of the "penalties" and don't want to do a google search.

Fill me in.

And also fill me in on the likelihood of convicting two people, in a court of law, with no real credible witnesses and no complainants.
 

So you are saying that the KKK would be voter intimidation? Good

I see baton carrying black panther thugs as voter intimidation as well.

Um..

Again..the KKK are "limited" in doing anything. If they should up to polling places in white sheets..they can probably expect the same treatment..soup to nuts.

Once it was established someone had a problem with this idiots..they were escorted from the area, and an injuction was issued against them, barring them from carrying batons to polling areas. However, there were no complaints about voter intimidation from anyone voting in those stations.

So..what more do you think should be done?

What "sentence" would be appropriate?

There doesn't need to be complaints by voters in order for there to be a violation of the Voting Rights Act.

:lol:

Sorry..that's just funny.
 
I love how this administration is bringing us all closer together. A real uniter he is.
 
And what exactly do you propose?

Life without parole?

These guys were barred from carrying their nightsticks to polls. They were also detained by authorities.

So..if that was not enough..what sort of penalty should have been metted out? And exactly how would one going about prosecuting with no complaints?

The Voting rights act spells out penalties.

Do you want to repeal the Voting Rights Act, or just selectively enforce it?

Feel free.

I am ignorant of the "penalties" and don't want to do a google search.

Fill me in.

And also fill me in on the likelihood of convicting two people, in a court of law, with no real credible witnesses and no complainants.

Because white people who complain about black people intimidating them when they vote are not "credible?"

About 10 a.m., a complaint from an unknown caller went to the local Republican Party headquarters. The message was relayed to Chris Hill, a GOP poll watcher, who hurried over with two lawyers.

As he walked up the driveway to the polling place, Hill said in an interview, Heath called out: "What are you doing here, cracker?"

Hill ignored him and walked between the two men. Jackson brushed his shoulder, Hill said.

Inside, a black poll worker said that although the Panthers had made no direct threats, he didn't feel safe going outside, according to Hill, who then called police.

Enforcement of Civil Rights Laws Debated | TheLedger.com
 
Um..

Again..the KKK are "limited" in doing anything. If they should up to polling places in white sheets..they can probably expect the same treatment..soup to nuts.

Once it was established someone had a problem with this idiots..they were escorted from the area, and an injuction was issued against them, barring them from carrying batons to polling areas. However, there were no complaints about voter intimidation from anyone voting in those stations.

So..what more do you think should be done?

What "sentence" would be appropriate?

There doesn't need to be complaints by voters in order for there to be a violation of the Voting Rights Act.

:lol:

Sorry..that's just funny.

There doesn't, asshole. Anyone can complain, a poll worker, a poll watcher, anyone.
 
What exactly does one thing have to do with the other? IMHO the KKK should be labeled a terrorist organization, heck, they've been involved in enough actions.

They are not.

And they are not at all limited in doing anything.



So you are saying that the KKK would be voter intimidation? Good

I see baton carrying black panther thugs as voter intimidation as well.

Um..

Again..the KKK are "limited" in doing anything. If they should up to polling places in white sheets..they can probably expect the same treatment..soup to nuts.

Once it was established someone had a problem with this idiots..they were escorted from the area, and an injuction was issued against them, barring them from carrying batons to polling areas. However, there were no complaints about voter intimidation from anyone voting in those stations.

So..what more do you think should be done?

What "sentence" would be appropriate?

I am not inserted in sentences. The point is that the black panthers only reason to be there is voter intimidation. Period.

So how about baton toting skin heads? That work better for you over the kkk? I think you get my point of choice of group to counter the black panthers.

The idea would be that neither party EVER show up at ANY polling place. Saying that the black panthers is not voter intimation is just as stupid as saying that the kkk or skin heads are not voter intimation.
 
Report: Justice Dept. tried hiding officials' role in Panther lawsuit dismissal

Report: Justice Dept. tried hiding officials' role in Panther lawsuit dismissal

By Jerry Markon
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, October 29, 2010

The Justice Department has tried to hide the extensive involvement of high-level political officials in the dismissal of a controversial voter-intimidation lawsuit against members of the New Black Panther Party, a federal commission concluded in a draft report.

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights said the department's reversal in the case indicates that its Civil Rights Division is failing to protect white voters and is "at war with its core mission of guaranteeing equal protection [under] the laws for all Americans.''

The Justice Department denied the allegations in the report, based on the commission's year-long investigation into the Obama administration's handling of the 2008 incident. The Bush administration had filed the lawsuit against members of the New Black Panther Party, but the Obama Justice Department dismissed most of the case. ...

Dispute over New Black Panthers case causes deep divisions

Dispute over New Black Panthers case causes deep divisions

By Jerry Markon and Krissah Thompson
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, October 22, 2010; 3:29 PM

...
You have to read the whole article to understand what actually transpired and where the divisions are.

One thing the Post makes clear, the decisions on the NBPP case, were not made by the Bush people, which had tried unsuccessfully to clear up the problems regarding equal protection by DOJ. The problems didn't start with Obama's people, just became a non-issue, as they agreed with Whites cannot be discriminated against.
 
The Black Panthers have not been convicted of anything, or even arrested for that fact. If they have the appropriate credentials, they have as much right to be poll watchers as all of us.
 
You want to simultaneously claim they did not violate it, and that they did violate it, but the punishment fit the crime.

Okay..since you didn't want to..I found one..

The bill also increases the penalty for voter intimidation. Under current law, voter intimidation is already a crime. This bill increases the maximum penalty for voter intimidation from one year to five years in prison. Someone who tries to keep voters away from the polls with threats should not be released with a slap on the wrist and this bill will create real penalties for this crime.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi | Current Legislation

So more then likely these guys are probably doing this for the first time. And no one complained they were stopped from voting. So..you think it's appropriate to haul these guys into court..waste the court's time and our money on something they will very probably walk on..because what?
 

Forum List

Back
Top