BREAKING: 200+ “Militarized” Federal Police Surround Peaceful Rancher in Nevada

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Lovebears65, Apr 9, 2014.

  1. Camp
    Offline

    Camp Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2013
    Messages:
    18,423
    Thanks Received:
    3,663
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +11,270
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAoBx4SXOTc]BOLD Nebraska - Randy Thompson - YouTube[/ame]
     
  2. Camp
    Offline

    Camp Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2013
    Messages:
    18,423
    Thanks Received:
    3,663
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +11,270
  3. Uncensored2008
    Offline

    Uncensored2008 Libertarian Radical Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    65,364
    Thanks Received:
    8,401
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Behind the Orange Curtain
    Ratings:
    +29,738
  4. Camp
    Offline

    Camp Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2013
    Messages:
    18,423
    Thanks Received:
    3,663
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +11,270
    What do you mean it doesn't show infringement of peoples land. That is exactly what it shows. In the case of Bundy, his land wasn't being infringed upon. The issue is with public lands that he has had access to and is now being denied. But the land in question was never "his" land. Other than the threat of the loss of his land in a legal battle, no one has told Bundy how he could or couldn't use his land.
    In the case of the pipeline, the governments (STATE AND FEDERAL) have stepped in and are demanding these people give up certain control of the land they own. They drew a map where they wanted the pipeline to go and pushed the wishes of the landowners aside.
    Bundy and his cause was a scam. The supporters were scammed into fighting for a deadbeat over public lands that the taxpayers are supposed to be paid for. Our employees were abused by people who didn't really give a crap about property rights. They were just using the issue for their own political agenda, even it it did't really fit.
    The place to fight over government intervention in property rights is wherever the pipeline wants to go and the people who own the private property object to it infringing on their property. But the people behind the pipeline are the same people who finance the the folks who supported and continue to support Bundy. Tea Party = Big Oil.
     
  5. Uncensored2008
    Offline

    Uncensored2008 Libertarian Radical Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    65,364
    Thanks Received:
    8,401
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Behind the Orange Curtain
    Ratings:
    +29,738
    You didn't read your own article. The issue is concern of leakage into the Ogallala aquifer. An easement to run the underground pipes has no impact on anything.

    {TransCanada says it will submit a new proposal to the U.S. government next year. The proposed route, the company says, won't go through the Sandhills.}

    Seriously dude, you're trying to fit a stapler in a hole made for a marble...
     
  6. Camp
    Offline

    Camp Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2013
    Messages:
    18,423
    Thanks Received:
    3,663
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +11,270
    It explains why private property owners don't want the pipeline crossing their lands.

    http://landownersagainstthranscanadapipeline.org

    Are you seriously trying to make an issue that landowners aren't protesting the pipeline or that they don't have an issue, but Bundy does?
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2014
  7. holston
    Offline

    holston VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Messages:
    1,188
    Thanks Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +55
    Jews contribute the most money to both Democratic and Republican parties than anyone.
    You are the fool if you think that this money comes with no strings attached.

    The NEO-CONS do not represent the same interests or principles of the "Paleo-Conservatives. Where do you think those terms come from?
    It was Jews who formed the Neo-Con Party.

    The Jews have positioned themselves to play both sides of the fence. A Do Do should be able to see the advantage to this.




    Socialism
    The amount of material available to support the thesis that the Jews over-all have been Socialists and "leftist" is too extensive to post.


    I don't associate with Stormfront. The information I have learned about the Jews can be derived from Jewish sources alone.


    While it is true that there are still Blue Dog Democrats who believe that the Democratic party hasn't changed since the Civil War and Republican who likewise are ignorant of the parties new management, the fact remains that Jews dominate both parties.

    This helps to explain why no matter who gets appointed to the White House, national policies have continued on their present course since Papa Bush 'til now.
    Despite the great shuckin' and jivin' show which simulates fierce rivalry, this appearance is created for mass consumption.
    While the masses may be sincere in their political ideologies, the decisions of the ruling class are not based upon the will of the people. That is something they have to work around.


    I consider Ron Paul to be the closest thing to a man who is what he represents himself to be that I know of on the national stage. While I do not consider myself a Libertarian, I was drawn to him because of his determination to expose the Federal Reserve and his opposition to the unending campaign of war in the mideast and his frank refusal to genuflect before the Zionist political machine.

    You saw how they shut him down didn't you, despite his overwhelming popularity in various places? And you saw how the Neo-Cons stuck their Stooge Bush in the White House to take the flack for 9/11?
    The last I heard, the two most viable candidates to run for office after the reign of King Yomamma runs it's course will include yet another member of the Bush dynasty and Hillary Clinton.
    If you think that either of those "choices" would make a difference as far as pushing the "Project for a Jew American Century" to it's next stage, you are fooling yourself, not me.




    If you can find any quotes from Mein Kampf then post them. Otherwise you are making more false allegations. Once people realize that you are deliberately misrepresenting me, then it is YOU who will lose credibility, if they are fair minded at all.


    Let's check and see........ "N", "D", "A".
    Hmm. Either "NDA" does not equate to "N", "A", "Z", "I" or one of us has his definition of acronym wrong.

    But enough with the "Nazi shit", OK? I've answered that charge twice already and you refuse to accept my answer. That's if you even read it at all.



    I beg your pardon. I've learned quite a bit about Judaism. I know a great deal more about Christianity though.

    There is one thing certain about both: Judaism does NOT equal Christianity.

    There is nothing Christian about Judaism other than the false claim by Jews that Christianity owes it's existence to them.


    Before I what?


    There is an old saying that if you want to destroy the Jews all you have to do is leave them alone.
    This may be true but we will never find out because the Jews won't leave us alone.

    People are ever making mistakes over the confusion they have when attempting to go from the particular to the general or from the general to the particular. The difference is similar to that between inductive and deductive reasoning.

    This perennial dilemma reminds me of the fits that concept of limits give some people in trying to resolve Zeno's paradox.

    Basically you are accusing me of making "blanket statements" and then pointing to what appear to be exceptions in an effort to discount the rule.

    All the while you are making sweeping generalizations about various people yourselves, so called "liberals" for starters.
    It is you who are the one making the argument that "left" and "right" have some real meaning other than the notions which are generally agreed upon in defining them.
    You have called me "ignorant" of this and "ignorant" about subjects which I have scarcely commented on. Aside from the little I have, you have nothing else with which to measure with. So you are not in a position to make that determination.
    You have accused me over and over of being a "Nazi" without realizing that the Germans didn't apply the term to themselves which shows a little of your own ignorance.




    I have nothing to do with Stormfront and I HAVE looked into Judaism more than most people.
    So, what do YOU know of it?

    I'm not asking you to describe the personal attributes of your childhood pal, Schlomo.

    What I am interested in is the main thrust of the prevailing doctrines of Judaism and the effects they may have over mass behavior.

    You seem to understand that principle when it comes to Muslims, or "Nazis". I don't see why you should encounter so many problems making the same types of generalizations with regard to Judaism.


    Everyone is familiar with cases of people who called themselves "Christian" or by one of it's many derivatives, who proved themselves by their words and deeds to be anything but an adherent to the doctrines of Christ.

    Many people falsely conclude that the ability for charlatans and hypocrites to assume serves to disprove the validity of Christ's teachings themselves. Whether they are actually unable to make the distinction clear in their own minds or they are seizing upon any means available to excuse themselves from having to deal with the issue may be known only to God himself.

    But it makes no more sense for the Jews or anyone else to make blanket indictments of "Christianity" or "Christiandom" on the whole than it would for me to make similar generalizations about Judaism.
    If you are going to demand that I enumerate all possible variations and exceptions to the rule every time I use the term, then I will have to make the same demand of you whether you are referring to "Democrats", "Republicans", "Christians", "liberals", "conservatives", the "left", the "right", or even "Nazis".

    That's unless you can give a comprehensive definition for each of those terms which covers all the bases in each and every instance.
     
    Last edited: May 9, 2014
  8. holston
    Offline

    holston VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Messages:
    1,188
    Thanks Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +55
    Reid Land Deal Under Scrutiny


    Shocking Allegations Show Harry Reid, Chinese Company Behind Nevada Ranch Standoff

     
  9. holston
    Offline

    holston VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2012
    Messages:
    1,188
    Thanks Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +55
    Fed's next land fight: New Mexico ranchers angered over water fenced off to cattle - Washington Times


    The government hasn't been too keen on fencing out the illegals and drug dealers from Mexico.
    It doesn't seem to bother them that drug cartels occupy large portions of Arizona parks .
    Eric Holder doesn't want to talk about the guns he sent them in Operation Fast and Furious and has defied Congress request to view records concerning it.




    Not to change the subject BUT...

    Exactly what does the Dept of Agriculture need with 40 cal submachine guns?!


    [​IMG]


    Meanwhile the Dept of Agriculture now has some need for 40 cal machine guns while Neo-Con talking head Beck warns his audience that anyone getting too rambunctious will be shot.

    Do any libs or Zionists out there care to take a crack at this?
    All we need is a simple explanation that makes sense. So there's no need to go sounding all conspiratorial on us.
     
    Last edited: May 17, 2014
  10. RKMBrown
    Offline

    RKMBrown Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2013
    Messages:
    17,506
    Thanks Received:
    1,583
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +3,297
    Clearly the sub machine guns are for shooting cows, I'd be looking for them to also be buying or leasing lots of backhoes so they can :dig: the evidence.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

calvin bundy ranch