Boy who refused treatment on religious grounds dies

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Nevadamedic, Nov 30, 2007.

  1. Nevadamedic
    Offline

    Nevadamedic Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1,439
    Thanks Received:
    178
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Diagon Alley
    Ratings:
    +179
    Story Highlights
    Dennis Lindberg, 14, was a Jehovah's Witness and a leukemia patient

    A judge denied a request to force the boy to have a blood transfusion

    Judge: Boy knew "he's basically giving himself a death sentence"

    Boy's birth parents believed their son should have had the transfusion

    http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/29/jehovahs.witness.ap/index.html

    These Witnesses should not be recognized as a religion since they are nothing more then a cult. I also think the aunt should be charged with atleast manslaughter and child endangerment.
     
  2. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    41,349
    Thanks Received:
    6,429
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +11,229
    You would be wrong. We all have the right to worship and to believe in the religion we chose. I disagree with the blood transfusion and several other "interesting" beliefs the Jehovah Witness have, but they have the right to have them, to practice them and as this Judge agreed that 14 year old had the right to his belief.

    They are no cult. You can not fit them into the definition of a cult. They can and do use scripture to support every position they have. I do not agree with their interpretation of some of those scriptures but again THEY get to believe as they chose.
     
  3. Shogun
    Offline

    Shogun Free: Mudholes Stomped

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    30,518
    Thanks Received:
    2,228
    Trophy Points:
    1,045
    Ratings:
    +2,311
    I agree with RGS. acting like JW are cultists pretty much adds to my atheist perspective that ALL you raving lunatics are no better than your craziest denomination. Making this boy get a transfusion would be like making the amish install airbags in their buggies. He made his choice according to his personal understanding of his faith and died by his convictions. the end result doesn't effect any of you pharisee christians.


    If only half of you had the same spiritual backbone to live your own lives according to your accepted doctrines instead of running behind the safe comfort of "we all sin and fall short of the glory of god" every time you need to rationalize some indiscretion.
     
  4. mattskramer
    Offline

    mattskramer Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    5,852
    Thanks Received:
    360
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Texas
    Ratings:
    +361

    Do you even know the Bible passages that the Jehovah’s Witnesses interpret to mean that blood transfusion is wrong? Read Genesis 9:3, Leviticus 17:10, and Acts 15:299. Educate yourself and don’t be so quick to judge. It was the child’s choice to refuse blood. I thought that Republicans were the ones who wanted government to stay out of religion. What's next – let’s prohibit the Amish from practicing their religion.

    http://www.uswaternews.com/archives/arcpolicy/2michea11.html

    - or are the Amish a cult too - not subject to the same rights as your religion? What is your definition of a cult – that which does not conform to my prefered religious practice? As the “Church Lady” would say - How convenient. Anyway, even if the Amish or the Witnesses are cults, the 1st amendment to the Constitution does not say Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof unless it is a cult…

    This is just another example of “mainstream Christians” being intolearant of less popular religious practices. Pick sides and fight.

    Hey M14 Shooter:
    a judge ruled that a 14-year-old Jehovah's Witness sick with leukemia had the right to refuse a blood transfusion

    What do you think of that jurisprudence?
     
  5. hjmick
    Offline

    hjmick Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    17,177
    Thanks Received:
    4,900
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Ratings:
    +8,236
    While I agree with the right of the Witnesses to worship as they choose and I respect (though I don't understand or agree with the whole blood thing, along with some of the other stuff) their rights, I look at this story as more of an issue of parental rights. Now, I have no idea why this kid was living with his aunt, but I'm guessing that since it is she who is the witness, not the boys parents, she is the reason he fell into this belief system. Were he living with his parents, I'd be willing to bet that his belief system would have been radically different and he would still be alive today.

    The wishes of his biological parents were ignored. What they wanted was not a factor. I have a problem with this where a minor child is concerned.
     
  6. jillian
    Online

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    74,629
    Thanks Received:
    13,637
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +25,989
    The difference betwen a cult and a religion? 2000 years.

    In NY, I think the Court would have ordered treatment for a minor.
     
  7. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    41,349
    Thanks Received:
    6,429
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +11,229
    So Islam is a cult then.
     
  8. Shogun
    Offline

    Shogun Free: Mudholes Stomped

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Messages:
    30,518
    Thanks Received:
    2,228
    Trophy Points:
    1,045
    Ratings:
    +2,311
    do YOU want to point that finger, mormon?
     
  9. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    41,349
    Thanks Received:
    6,429
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +11,229
    I am showing that Jillian's definition is wrong. Time does not make a religion a religion or a cult not a cult. Her definition would mean that Islam is now a cult.
     
  10. jillian
    Online

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    74,629
    Thanks Received:
    13,637
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +25,989
    I was being glib.... the point was that there isn't very much difference besides time/acceptance.
     

Share This Page