Border Patrol Training Videos Say to "Hide", "Run Away" in Active Shooter Situations

Discussion in 'Politics' started by ScienceRocks, Jul 14, 2012.

  1. ScienceRocks
    Offline

    ScienceRocks Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    54,916
    Thanks Received:
    5,308
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    The Good insane United states of America
    Ratings:
    +20,021
    Border Patrol Training Videos Say to "Hide", "Run Away" in Active Shooter Situations
    The Center for Immigration Studies ^ | July 13, 2012 | Janice Kephart

    The National Border Patrol Council Local 2544 in Tucson, Ariz., is just a little angry. Local 2544, which is the largest Border Patrol union local with over 3,300 dues-paying members, tags itself as "the real border security experts". What are they angry about? Apparently, the current administration's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) senior officials have created what agents call "virtual brainwashing videos". Their website states that Border Patrol agents have been forced to take a virtual learning course on "active shooters" where the bottom line is that if they encounter an active shooter, as in Fort Hood, the Giffords shooting, or Columbine, they — as law enforcement officers — are to "run away" and "hide".

    The site goes on, "If we are cornered by such a shooter we are to (only as a last resort) become 'aggressive' and 'throw things' at him or her." As if the Border Patrol is not law enforcement, they are then advised to "call law enforcement and wait for their arrival …. Multiple quizzes throughout the course and a final test ensure repeatedly that we know that we only have three options … 1. Run away; 2. Hide; and 3. Only put up a fight as a last resort by acting aggressively and throwing things at the shooter. Not one mention anywhere of 'if you are carrying a gun and you have the opportunity take the shooter out'."

    The union local's website statement ends like this:

    It is always comforting to know that for those of us who carry a weapon when we are off-duty, if we should encounter such a situation, stop a shooter and save countless lives, we can look forward to being disciplined or fired by the Border Patrol because we should have run away to hide and then maybe thrown objects at the killer instead of taking action and stopping him with a firearm. ...

    Welcome to the New Patrol.

    With these complaints public, DHS is now trying to reverse itself and says it will "revise and clarify this training" shortly. Local 2544 put up a statement saying they "look forward to seeing the new training".


    I spoke at length to a long-time, well-respected senior member of the border enforcement community yesterday and he rolled his eyes when I mentioned the video. All immigration law enforcement has been required to watch the video, he said. He described the idea that law enforcement officers are not to do their job in clear and dangerous situations as "simply ridiculous and insulting".

    This verification of the Tucson local's commentary from a senior official whom I trust made me wonder about the competency and true intent of DHS officials — who, to date, have been nothing short of brazen in rolling back immigration enforcement across the board. This training is being forced on law enforcement officers without caveats or exceptions to the "active shooter" rule in either the literature or virtual learning videos. What conclusion is any reasonable immigration law enforcement officer supposed to draw other than "hide" or "throw things" in such a situation? If a choice is made to stop a shooting rampage, the outcome could be a serious reprimand, even if lives are saved.

    Does the Obama administration not mind a scenario where chaos multiplies because they do not want guns used? Can they not see the possibility of another Fort Hood massacre? This is the same administration that actively supported "Fast and Furious", a gun-walking operation that resulted in hundreds killed in Mexico and at least one border agent in the United States. The hypocrisy is blatant. Nothing new, I know. Yet it remains hard to sit by and watch hard-working immigration law enforcement officers demeaned and repeatedly told not to perform their sworn duties.
    http://cis.org/kephart/border-patrol-training-videos-say-hide-run-away-active-shooter-situations
     
  2. GuyPinestra
    Offline

    GuyPinestra Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2012
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    667
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +669
    Damn they are some treasonous bastards! Fucking Man-et Napolitano is a useless excuse in DHS.
     
  3. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Feels Good! Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    24,191
    Thanks Received:
    5,260
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +8,145
    Border Patrol "is not Law Enforcement"? WTF?

    They go through FLETC in Georgia or New Mexico, they're Federal Law Enforcement.
     
  4. Neotrotsky
    Offline

    Neotrotsky Council to Supreme Soviet

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    10,490
    Thanks Received:
    1,274
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    People's Republic
    Ratings:
    +2,451
    What is one more dead Border Patrol man to this administration
     
  5. ScienceRocks
    Offline

    ScienceRocks Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    54,916
    Thanks Received:
    5,308
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    The Good insane United states of America
    Ratings:
    +20,021
    We're allowing our government to become every bit as corrupt as Mexico's. Maybe the agreement for joining our nations is just that? :mad: No it wouldn't matter.
     

Share This Page