Bombing Harvard “Accidentally”

Discussion in 'Education' started by Flanders, Oct 29, 2012.

  1. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    Socialists transformed public schools into religious schools dedicated to teaching socialism. I base that conclusion on the fact that socialism is taught long after the three R's are mastered.

    Teaching the three R's was the foundation for public education. It made sense to teach children a national language and basic arithmetic. Not long after publicly-funded basic education for every child was accepted by Americans, obedience to socialism became the primary goal of education training. As in all things government, Socialists quickly began enlarging its “education” mandate. The XVI Amendment eventually financed American Socialists in many areas of society, but tax dollar tithing began with education.

    I want to approach the subject of socialism in public schools by first citing Catholic elementary schools. I selected Catholic schools to use as an example. The principles are the same if you substitute schools run by any religion. Schools run by an organized religion are basically the same in that they teach the tenets of their religion while teaching the three R's.

    Catholic schools teach students the Pope is infallible in matters of faith and morals. That is an oversimplified example of teaching a specific religion. Every religious school has its own unique doctrine although the differences are often negligible to the outsider when looking at religious sects faithful to the same God. The goal of every religious school is universal; make the child a lifelong supporter of the religion being taught. For all practical purposes devotion to a religion means financial support for a specific church. There is nothing wrong with organized religion so long as participation remains voluntary.

    When anyone says they attended a Catholic school there is no doubt what they mean, what was taught and who taught it. Teachers in Catholic schools are usually priests, or nuns, or brothers, or lay Catholics with teaching credentials. Christian sects also have Sunday Schools where the Christian faith is taught even though the child may go to a public school to learn the three R's.

    Notice that Jefferson’s always-elusive Separation of Church and State works very nicely when both sides stay and play in their own backyard:


    Just to be clear about the doctrine of the Separation of Church and State. Socialists succeeded in circumventing the First Amendment. Because socialism is now the state religion funded by tax dollars there is no separation of church and state in America today. Logically, every religion should now have equal access to tax dollars. It has to be all or none if freedom is going to survive.

    Attending an organized religion school is voluntary. Attending public schools is involuntary especially for those who cannot afford a private education. I do not mean the working poor only. In today's America the middle class cannot afford to send their children to a religion’s school and support the public education system as well. Private education for more than one child is completely out of reach for most Americans.

    Homeschooling is becoming an option, but is still limited to those parents who are determined to keep their children out of the public schools without sending them to a school run by a traditional religion.

    Now compare the teachers in the public schools to the teachers in voluntary Catholic schools. Keep in mind that Catholic school faculties teach religion alongside the three R's with the full consent of the parents who send their kids to Catholic schools; whereas, socialism is a religion being taught in public schools without the consent of most parents. It is important to make that distinction in order to understand that Socialists teaching in public schools are priests. Look at it this way:

    Should voluntary Catholic schools be limited to teaching the three R's only they would have no rationalization for being. Conversely, involuntary public education limited to teaching the three R's only would deny Socialists their legal authority to indoctrinate children in the glories of socialism/communism.

    I want to point out that after a century of controlling America's education system Socialists still have to impose socialism on society at large by going through the courts because they cannot legislate their religion. In fact, in 2005:


    Three-judge panel says parental rights end at schoolhouse door
    By Lori Arnold

    Three-judge panel says parental rights end at schoolhouse door

    The “Schoolhouse Door” ruling was a monumental victory for collectivist brainwashing, yet few Americans know about it, nor is it ever connected to giving more money to the education industry —— routinely rubber-stamped by state legislators and the US Congress.

    Some confusion is bound to exist when you see teachers who practice a religion teaching in public schools. That confusion works to the advantage of Socialists. A diverse faculty gives Socialists plausible deniability when they are accused of teaching socialism.

    The truth is: Today’s Socialists control America's classrooms through the ED (Department Of Education); that control is strengthened by court-enforced academic freedom whenever a specific “freedom” favors something Socialists are after. So socialism being taught by a Catholic teacher in a public school does nothing to exonerate Socialists in spite of plausible deniability. Also, a Catholic teacher in a public school caught teaching Catholicism would be dismissed immediately. That same teacher will be executed after America becomes a full-blown Communist state.

    Then there is question of secondary schools funded with tax dollars. The curricula in institutions of higher learning is no more free of socialism’s doctrine than is the curricula in elementary schools. Can you imagine what would happen in colleges and universities if students showed up without all of that preliminary brainwashing?

    Teaching history deserves special mention. History must be taken out of the realm of propaganda, or stop teaching it altogether. There is no other subject that so exposes the Communist priesthood in elementary and secondary schools more than does the things being taught by today's history teachers in public schools. Multiculturalism, environmentalism, sex education, and every other corrosive subject Socialists can dream up somehow find their way into history courses like political yeast. One example: The Founding Fathers did not create the greatest amount of freedom the common man ever knew. In socialist history the Founding Fathers were slave-holding, polluting thieves, who stole the country from the wonderful Indians who were one with nature.

    As for funding higher education: Higher education should not get a penny of tax money nor should children be pre-programmed to accept socialism from their professors in college simply to get a diploma.

    Journalism schools, film schools, etc., get tax dollars, too, and you see what they have produced. Worse still are schools for government; they are nothing but Socialist seminaries. Whenever I think of them I think of the plots in two 1964 movies; Failsafe and Dr. Strangelove. Both movies promote the Left’s favorite line of crapola. In both pictures a nuclear bomb is accidentally dropped on the USSR. In a show of good faith the American president makes a deal. The Soviets can bomb one American city in order to avert an all-out nuclear war.

    My suggestion is to “accidentally” bomb the University of Tehran after Iran gets the bomb, then tell Iran’s leader he can bomb Harvard to even the score.

    Parenthetically, Hollywood never made a movie where the Soviets offered the US the same deal after they bombed an American city by accident. There was no need for such a movie. Peace-loving, humanitarian, Communists offering the city-for-city deal is always implied.

    Homeschooling


    Socialists/Communists controlling America’s teachers’ unions, and the ED, are surely watching their philosophical allies in Europe more closely than they are clocking the presidential election. Here’s the latest:

    Crack appears in opposition to homeschoolers
    Former labor chief: Education system 'ignores' importance of parents
    Published: 15 hours ago
    by BOB UNRUH

    Crack appears in opposition to homeschoolers

    There is no reason for panic just yet. Even if Romney does cut funding as he said, the ED knows that funding is going to be increased on state and local levels no matter who wins the election. They also know that parental Rights still do not “. . . extend beyond the threshold of the school door.”

    Basically, European Socialists appear to be losing a little ground, while their American counterparts are moving forward. Moving forward is putting it mildly. It has gotten worse since Phyllis Schlafly warned us about the NEA in 2007:


     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2012
  2. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,560
    Thanks Received:
    13,013
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,439
    how on earth would you expect state funds to increase if federal funds are cut?

    what a liar you are... that or delusional.

    and phyllis schlafly? she was insane then...citing her as "wisdom" now is even more insane.

    catholic schools...

    wacko.
     
  3. longknife
    Offline

    longknife Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    25,205
    Thanks Received:
    8,349
    Trophy Points:
    900
    Location:
    Sin City
    Ratings:
    +13,584
    I'm really torn over responding to this.

    I've attended public and parochial schools. Both bored me to tears.

    I was raised in a home with three sets of encyclopedias, every National Graphic Society Magazine published since their start to the 1950s, and endless books - I started reading BEFORE kindergarten.

    I've also seen what the current public schools offer and it's a crying shame! Kids come home to tell me what they "learned" and I had to set them straight. Thank The Lord I have a computer to back my words up.

    As things are today, I firmly believe the best schools are e-schools or homeschooling.

    As for the colleges and universities, I would never send my kids to a "public" one, opting instead for Notre Dame, Pepperdine, or other church-backed institutions.
     
  4. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    To jillian: Are you off your meds again! Ask your keeper to explain where education tax dollars come from on state and local levels.

    To jillian: Your diagnosis did not dispute anything Ms. Schlafly said; so I assume you are judging her by your own shaky mental condition —— a condition common among liberals. Symptom: Attack the messenger when the message is too much to handle.

    Friendly suggestion: Get back on those meds as soon as possible.
    To longknife: I don’t know why. Your thoughts are clear.

    To longknife: I don’t know enough about e-schools to comment, but I agree on homeschooling. Put everything else aside and homeschooling is the best way to keep government propaganda from contaminating young minds.

    Do you remember this in the article I linked:


    Hitler also said:

    Hitler’s declaration in the latter quote is why Socialists fear homeschooling. Home schooled children escape forcible indoctrination; hence, they have the best chance of growing up free of a suffocating institutional personality.
     
  5. blimpo
    Offline

    blimpo Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    432
    Thanks Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +63
    Some of you guys are a hoot.

    You seriously want to win the hearts and minds of our youth?

    Buy'em the newest hottest cellphone. They'll love you for a minute or so and then tell you to buzz off when they start using it...
     
  6. Moonglow
    Offline

    Moonglow Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    82,038
    Thanks Received:
    8,039
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    sw mizzouri
    Ratings:
    +29,653
    Darn that socialistic military
     
  7. blimpo
    Offline

    blimpo Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    432
    Thanks Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +63
    Bombing Harvard “Accidentally”

    I have a friend who has a nephew that "bombed" at Harvard accidently.

    He partied with the rich and privilaged and 'accidently' bombed out at the end of the first semester.
     
  8. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    6,583
    Thanks Received:
    634
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,588
    To blimpo: All of you guys give me a hoot because you seldom get anything right.

    I do not want to win the hearts and minds of anybody. I do want Socialists to stop brainwashing American children with American tax dollars.


    To Moonglow:

     
  9. blimpo
    Offline

    blimpo Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    432
    Thanks Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +63


    Still way out in right field I see, rightfully named Flander's Field.

    You ought to be out standing there instead of on here with your wacky socialism stuff.

    Where is old Joe when you need him?
     
  10. blimpo
    Offline

    blimpo Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    Messages:
    432
    Thanks Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +63
    Home schooled children escape forcible indoctrination; hence, they have the best chance of growing up free of a suffocating institutional personality.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page