Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"I think lifting the liability cap on BP and for this spill is appropriate," Boehner said.
"This Week" host Jake Tapper asked, "So lift it entirely for BP?"
"Absolutely," Boehner said. "They should be held responsible for every dime of this cost."
Oh Puh-leeeze.
As I and many others have said repeatedly: time is of the essence. The Feds have collected money over the years ($1.5B and counting) to respond to an oil disaster crisis. Any money spent now to prevent further damage can be recovered from BP via fines and the legal process if an investigation yields proof that they are 100% responsible.
The Feds' lack of a proper response has actually exacerbated the damage, and weakens its case that BP is solely responsible.
Oh Puh-leeeze.
As I and many others have said repeatedly: time is of the essence. The Feds have collected money over the years ($1.5B and counting) to respond to an oil disaster crisis. Any money spent now to prevent further damage can be recovered from BP via fines and the legal process if an investigation yields proof that they are 100% responsible.
The Feds' lack of a proper response has actually exacerbated the damage, and weakens its case that BP is solely responsible.
link to the $1.5 billion collected for oil disasters, pretty please.
Oh Puh-leeeze.
As I and many others have said repeatedly: time is of the essence. The Feds have collected money over the years ($1.5B and counting) to respond to an oil disaster crisis. Any money spent now to prevent further damage can be recovered from BP via fines and the legal process if an investigation yields proof that they are 100% responsible.
The Feds' lack of a proper response has actually exacerbated the damage, and weakens its case that BP is solely responsible.
link to the $1.5 billion collected for oil disasters, pretty please.
Here you go, the Feds want to raise the current 8 cent per barrel tax to 40 cents, claiming that the current oil spill will exhaust the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. (They haven't spent the $1.5B btw - they are just claiming it won't cover all of the damage - the same damage they are saying BP should cover.)
The existing tax rate of 8 cents has already financed a $1.5 billion liability trust fund, which is nowhere near enough to pay for the damages. The cost of the spill, resulting from an offshore oil rig disaster off the coast of Louisiana that killed 11 workers in April, could exceed $14 billion, according to the bill.
"[The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund] is essentially exhausted, assuming that all the funds are needed for this spill," said Tezak.
The trust fund covers damage costs -- calculated separately from clean-up costs which the responsible companies must pay for. The damages in the Gulf of Mexico are both environmental, including the effects on wildlife, and economic, like the losses suffered by the fishing and tourism industries.
House to consider raising 8-cent oil tax to 32 cents - May. 24, 2010
Uses of the Fund
With the consolidation of these funds and the collection of a tax on the petroleum industry, the Fund increased to $1 billion. Fund uses were delineated by OPA to include:
* Removal costs incurred by the Coast Guard and EPA
* State access for removal activities;
* Payments to federal, state, and Indian tribe trustees to conduct natural resource damage assessments and restorations;
* Payment of claims for uncompensated removal costs and damages;
* Research and development; and
* Other specific appropriations.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 increased the maximum size of the Fund to $2.7 billion.
Structure of the Fund
The OSLTF has two major components.
1. The Emergency Fund is available for Federal On-Scene Coordinators (FOSCs) to respond to discharges and for federal trustees to initiate natural resource damage assessments. The Emergency Fund is a recurring $50 million available to the President annually.
2. The remaining Principal Fund balance is used to pay claims and to fund appropriations by Congress to Federal agencies to administer the provisions of OPA and support research and development.
The Emergency Fund
To ensure rapid, effective response to oil spills, the President has the authority to make available--without Congressional appropriation--up to $50 million each year to fund removal activities and initiate NRDAs. Funds not used in a fiscal year are available until expended. To the extent that $50 million is inadequate, the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 granted authority to advance up to $100 million from the Principal Fund to fund removal activities. (This provision has not been utilized to date.)
A core mission of the NPFC is to administer the disbursement and ensure proper use of the Emergency Fund, 24 hours a day, every day, so that the FOSC can immediately respond to a discharge or monitor prompt and effective cleanup activities by the responsible party (RP). the Emergency Fund can be used by FOSCs to cover expenses associated with mitigating the threat of an oil spill, as well as the costs of oil spill containment, countermeasures, cleanup, and disposal activities. While the use of the OSLTF is most closely associated with discharges from ships, it has increasingly been used for discharges at industrial or onshore oil storage and production facilities.
The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (OSLTF)
The President has access to immediate allocation of emergency funds. If these had been spent on booms, dredging, and berms, the actual damage would be less than we are now facing.
so, we are using the 1.5 billion of this fund ALL on bp's gulf gusher?
and leaving nothing in the kitty for all of the other yearly oil mishaps?
and the gvt wants to raise taxes on all other oil companies to pay for refilling this kitty, when it is BP that will deplete it all?
am i understanding that right?
link to the $1.5 billion collected for oil disasters, pretty please.
Here you go, the Feds want to raise the current 8 cent per barrel tax to 40 cents, claiming that the current oil spill will exhaust the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund. (They haven't spent the $1.5B btw - they are just claiming it won't cover all of the damage - the same damage they are saying BP should cover.)
The existing tax rate of 8 cents has already financed a $1.5 billion liability trust fund, which is nowhere near enough to pay for the damages. The cost of the spill, resulting from an offshore oil rig disaster off the coast of Louisiana that killed 11 workers in April, could exceed $14 billion, according to the bill.
"[The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund] is essentially exhausted, assuming that all the funds are needed for this spill," said Tezak.
The trust fund covers damage costs -- calculated separately from clean-up costs which the responsible companies must pay for. The damages in the Gulf of Mexico are both environmental, including the effects on wildlife, and economic, like the losses suffered by the fishing and tourism industries.
House to consider raising 8-cent oil tax to 32 cents - May. 24, 2010
Uses of the Fund
With the consolidation of these funds and the collection of a tax on the petroleum industry, the Fund increased to $1 billion. Fund uses were delineated by OPA to include:
* Removal costs incurred by the Coast Guard and EPA
* State access for removal activities;
* Payments to federal, state, and Indian tribe trustees to conduct natural resource damage assessments and restorations;
* Payment of claims for uncompensated removal costs and damages;
* Research and development; and
* Other specific appropriations.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 increased the maximum size of the Fund to $2.7 billion.
Structure of the Fund
The OSLTF has two major components.
1. The Emergency Fund is available for Federal On-Scene Coordinators (FOSCs) to respond to discharges and for federal trustees to initiate natural resource damage assessments. The Emergency Fund is a recurring $50 million available to the President annually.
2. The remaining Principal Fund balance is used to pay claims and to fund appropriations by Congress to Federal agencies to administer the provisions of OPA and support research and development.
The Emergency Fund
To ensure rapid, effective response to oil spills, the President has the authority to make available--without Congressional appropriation--up to $50 million each year to fund removal activities and initiate NRDAs. Funds not used in a fiscal year are available until expended. To the extent that $50 million is inadequate, the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 granted authority to advance up to $100 million from the Principal Fund to fund removal activities. (This provision has not been utilized to date.)
A core mission of the NPFC is to administer the disbursement and ensure proper use of the Emergency Fund, 24 hours a day, every day, so that the FOSC can immediately respond to a discharge or monitor prompt and effective cleanup activities by the responsible party (RP). the Emergency Fund can be used by FOSCs to cover expenses associated with mitigating the threat of an oil spill, as well as the costs of oil spill containment, countermeasures, cleanup, and disposal activities. While the use of the OSLTF is most closely associated with discharges from ships, it has increasingly been used for discharges at industrial or onshore oil storage and production facilities.
The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (OSLTF)
The President has access to immediate allocation of emergency funds. If these had been spent on booms, dredging, and berms, the actual damage would be less than we are now facing.
so, we are using the 1.5 billion of this fund ALL on bp's gulf gusher?
and leaving nothing in the kitty for all of the other yearly oil mishaps?
and the gvt wants to raise taxes on all other oil companies to pay for refilling this kitty, when it is BP that will deplete it all?
am i understanding that right?
Oh Puh-leeeze.
As I and many others have said repeatedly: time is of the essence. The Feds have collected money over the years ($1.5B and counting) to respond to an oil disaster crisis. Any money spent now to prevent further damage can be recovered from BP via fines and the legal process if an investigation yields proof that they are 100% responsible.
The Feds' lack of a proper response has actually exacerbated the damage, and weakens its case that BP is solely responsible.
Glad to see the Boner do something right for a change..Although this is a flip-flop from a little something he said earlier..Just sayin'
Oh Puh-leeeze.
As I and many others have said repeatedly: time is of the essence. The Feds have collected money over the years ($1.5B and counting) to respond to an oil disaster crisis. Any money spent now to prevent further damage can be recovered from BP via fines and the legal process if an investigation yields proof that they are 100% responsible.
The Feds' lack of a proper response has actually exacerbated the damage, and weakens its case that BP is solely responsible.
Glad to see the Boner do something right for a change..Although this is a flip-flop from a little something he said earlier..Just sayin'
I think GOP politicians woke up the fact that BP is about the only organization the American people are holding in lower esteem than the Republican party itself.
Well, anyway, if he is sincere and sticks to it, good for him.
I imagine eventually Rush Limbaugh, leader of American conservatism, will be about the only BP defender of any consequence left around.
