Bo Bergdahl 'Skates'

because Barack Obama.....
Obama made a shit trade... he traded five shit stains to get one shit stain back.[/QUOTE]
Obama did not trade the Taliban 5 for Bo Bergdahl. Bergdahl's captors demanded a ransom and was paid that ransom for bergdahl's release. Obama released the Taliban 5 as part of his attempt to close gitmo as part of his campaign promise. Obama released the five most dangerous terrorist and the leaders of the enemy which we were fighting in a war against at the time, making Obama a traitor just as much as Bo Bergdahl was, if not more.
 
because Barack Obama.....
Obama made a shit trade... he traded five shit stains to get one shit stain back.
Obama did not trade the Taliban 5 for Bo Bergdahl. Bergdahl's captors demanded a ransom and was paid that ransom for bergdahl's release. Obama released the Taliban 5 as part of his attempt to close gitmo as part of his campaign promise. Obama released the five most dangerous terrorist and the leaders of the enemy which we were fighting in a war against at the time, making Obama a traitor just as much as Bo Bergdahl was, if not more.[/QUOTE]
The cowardly love their own, proven by Obama and his little buddy bo Bergdahl
 
Obama did not trade the Taliban 5 for Bo Bergdahl. Bergdahl's captors demanded a ransom and was paid that ransom for bergdahl's release. Obama released the Taliban 5 as part of his attempt to close gitmo as part of his campaign promise. Obama released the five most dangerous terrorist and the leaders of the enemy which we were fighting in a war against at the time, making Obama a traitor just as much as Bo Bergdahl was, if not more.

Except they weren't sent back to Afghanistan and they were mostly bureaucrats.... but don't worry, scary brown people... that's all you see.
 
Once Obama became involved

Republicans demanded their pound of flesh out of Bergdahl
He got off Scott free… Why are you complaining?

No he didn't
He got busted down to private and a dishonorable discharge

you know the big talkers can't stand anything that reeks of fairness to anyone who isn't like them.

Thousands of other deserters in Iraq and Afghanistan

This is the only one Republicans care about

because Barack Obama.....

Exactly

Nobody would have given Bergdahl a second thought if Obama had not arranged his release
A political scapegoat by Republicans
 
This is Sgt. Mark Allen, who was shot in the head searching for Bergdahl

2yz0b4h.jpg
He also could have been shot on any other patrol

But he hasn't. He was shot on this specific one.

Going on any patrol is dangerous business

Bergdahl has no control over whether they patrol, their strength or their tactics.......that is a command responsibility

He didn't know they would be looking for him and risking their lives to find him, right?

What else to expect from leftist but to defend deserter and traitor.
 
This is Sgt. Mark Allen, who was shot in the head searching for Bergdahl

2yz0b4h.jpg
He also could have been shot on any other patrol

But he hasn't. He was shot on this specific one.

Going on any patrol is dangerous business

Bergdahl has no control over whether they patrol, their strength or their tactics.......that is a command responsibility

He didn't know they would be looking for him and risking their lives to find him, right?

What else to expect from leftist but to defend deserter and traitor.

It is not his responsibility to call out a patrol

Command must assess the risks involved. Are you claiming that if Bergdahl had not deserted there would be no patrols in that sector?
 
This is Sgt. Mark Allen, who was shot in the head searching for Bergdahl

2yz0b4h.jpg
He also could have been shot on any other patrol

But he hasn't. He was shot on this specific one.

Going on any patrol is dangerous business

Bergdahl has no control over whether they patrol, their strength or their tactics.......that is a command responsibility

He didn't know they would be looking for him and risking their lives to find him, right?

What else to expect from leftist but to defend deserter and traitor.

It is not his responsibility to call out a patrol

Command must assess the risks involved. Are you claiming that if Bergdahl had not deserted there would be no patrols in that sector?

Are you claiming there would?
 
He got off Scott free… Why are you complaining?

No he didn't
He got busted down to private and a dishonorable discharge

you know the big talkers can't stand anything that reeks of fairness to anyone who isn't like them.

Thousands of other deserters in Iraq and Afghanistan

This is the only one Republicans care about

because Barack Obama.....

Exactly

Nobody would have given Bergdahl a second thought if Obama had not arranged his release
A political scapegoat by Republicans

They did the same insane garbage for eight years.
 
He also could have been shot on any other patrol

But he hasn't. He was shot on this specific one.

Going on any patrol is dangerous business

Bergdahl has no control over whether they patrol, their strength or their tactics.......that is a command responsibility

He didn't know they would be looking for him and risking their lives to find him, right?

What else to expect from leftist but to defend deserter and traitor.

It is not his responsibility to call out a patrol

Command must assess the risks involved. Are you claiming that if Bergdahl had not deserted there would be no patrols in that sector?

Are you claiming there would?

Yup
 
Bergdahl should have been left there... That is where he chose to run to
 
Perhaps the ones that should be judging are those that have served a certain amount of time in ground combat. Infantry judges infantry, artillery judges artillery and so on.
 
Perhaps the ones that should be judging are those that have served a certain amount of time in ground combat. Infantry judges infantry, artillery judges artillery and so on.

The judge is a Col., and considering that we have had some kind of military conflict for the past 16 years, chances are pretty good that he's got some time in a conflict zone.
 
Perhaps the ones that should be judging are those that have served a certain amount of time in ground combat. Infantry judges infantry, artillery judges artillery and so on.

The judge is a Col., and considering that we have had some kind of military conflict for the past 16 years, chances are pretty good that he's got some time in a conflict zone.
And he views the problem as a colonel, as he should, but colonels might also view it from what is good for a colonel.
 
Perhaps the ones that should be judging are those that have served a certain amount of time in ground combat. Infantry judges infantry, artillery judges artillery and so on.

The judge is a Col., and considering that we have had some kind of military conflict for the past 16 years, chances are pretty good that he's got some time in a conflict zone.
And he views the problem as a colonel, as he should, but colonels might also view it from what is good for a colonel.
He was under immense political pressure
Well beyond a typical desertion case
 

Forum List

Back
Top