Bloomberg: I'm considering 2016 bid

An indictment of Hillary would knock her out of the race entirely, so that would leave people with the choice of an old Socialist or Nanny Bloomberg. I don't know when the deadline is for Biden if he wanted to join, but the Democrats can change their own rules at any time, so it's a moot point.

In the real world were Mrs. Rodham-Clinton/Lewinsky indicted she would instantly become far more attractive to Democrat Party adherents. As to Biden - I was thinking about him as riding the white (but not too white) horse down the convention aisle but, these days, Algore is looking to be a remote possibility but more and more doth it seem that Kerry might throw his medals into the ring.....
 
He is running and he dislikes Trump and Bernie for president equally. Wait for it before you applaud his effort too much, guys.

If Nanny Bloomberg does get in the race, then whoever we nominate on the Republican side will be the next President hands down; it doesn't matter who it is.
He does attract tons of libs. The establishment libs especially. I can sense he's their last "hope". IF Hillary is out.

An indictment of Hillary would knock her out of the race entirely, so that would leave people with the choice of an old Socialist or Nanny Bloomberg. I don't know when the deadline is for Biden if he wanted to join, but the Democrats can change their own rules at any time, so it's a moot point.
Well they haven't been able to produce an indictment yet. She won that debate and also 14 super delegates in NH so I'm not certain where you're getting your confidence that she'll be out of this race anytime soon.

I know your fantasies about her being dragged off to jail are strong and frequent but she's not going anywhere.

I'm hoping she doesn't. She has more baggage than a storage compartment of a 747. Hell, even the Democrats are voting in an admitted Socialist over her. He won with almost a 2 to 1 margin last night. People don't like this woman.

Likability means a lot in politics. It's the only reason DumBama won two terms. If Democrats think that people will come out in droves for Hillary like they did for DumBama, they have a rude awakening ahead of them.
He got votes in NH but she only got one less super delegate than he did. They, in essence, endorsed Hillary. In the general, we need a strong get out the vote campaign and her working her ass off which she always does and we have it.

I also want the senate back so I hope they're working hard.
 
An indictment of Hillary would knock her out of the race entirely, so that would leave people with the choice of an old Socialist or Nanny Bloomberg. I don't know when the deadline is for Biden if he wanted to join, but the Democrats can change their own rules at any time, so it's a moot point.

In the real world were Mrs. Rodham-Clinton/Lewinsky indicted she would instantly become far more attractive to Democrat Party adherents. As to Biden - I was thinking about him as riding the white (but not too white) horse down the convention aisle but, these days, Algore is looking to be a remote possibility but more and more doth it seem that Kerry might throw his medals into the ring.....

I don't know about that. It's one thing to support a guy who lied under oath because he got a BJ, and quite another to be passing along top secret government information on your own unsecured server.

I understand what you're saying, Democrats will be Democrats, but even the dumbest Democrat realizes what kind of position we might be in if one of our enemies had a copy of an e-mail she sent or received, and blackmailed her with the threat of releasing it to the US public. It's a serious thing depending on the information contained. Obama kicked the can down the road when it comes to Iranian nukes, and the ball will end up in the court of the next President. What if Iran is sitting on one of those damaging e-mails?
 
The DNC is stuck with Bernie Sanders and although cheating might get Hillary a couple of delegates it won't matter if Hillary is indicted. It's possible that the DNC has recruited Blumie to hedge their bets. A sad time for the dying democrat party.
 
Bloomberg would make two Jews in the race. Nutanyahoo must be salivating.

Why does being Jewish matter?

The Jewish really never had a prominent role in our government. Like Sanders.......here and there but not everywhere. I think it would be interesting to see the public response to a Jewish presidential candidate. It would probably be overlooked by most voters.
 
This may be actually happening. Bloomberg in a self funded, Independent run this year.

Michael Bloomberg says he is considering running for president of the United States, a move that would dramatically shake up an already chaotic 2016 race.

In an interview with Financial Times, the media mogul and former New York City mayor said he was "looking at all the options" when asked about a possible bid.

"I'm listening to what candidates are saying and what the primary voters appear to be doing," Bloomberg said, adding that he would need to add his name on ballots by early March in order to stage a serious campaign.

The billionaire also issued his most damning indictment of the current campaigns to date.

"I find the level of discourse and discussion distressingly banal and an outrage and an insult to the voters," Bloomberg told the Financial Times, adding that the public deserved "a lot better."

Bloomberg: I'm considering 2016 bid - CNNPolitics.com

The New York Times reported last month that he was considering a plan to run as an independent because he was troubled by Donald Trump's success on the Republican side, and Hillary Clinton's inability to stanch Bernie Sanders' growth on the Democratic side.

What do you think about that?
Candidates establish their infrastructure in every county of every state a year before Iowa. Too late.
Yeah, LBJ bowed out late but he turned the reigns over to Humphry. Hillary will do no such thing.
 
Open Borders scumbag; he will do anything to make a buck.
He did the John Gambling Radio Show every Friday morning at 9:00.
He hung up on anybody who disagreed with any of his policies.
A ruthless, power hungry egomaniac.
He's great for anyone living off their Stock Portfolio.
 
Open Borders scumbag; he will do anything to make a buck.
He did the John Gambling Radio Show every Friday morning at 9:00.
He hung up on anybody who disagreed with any of his policies.
A ruthless, power hungry egomaniac.
He's great for anyone living off their Stock Portfolio.
Meh, we'll see what happens. Before trump, I thought I'd seen it all. Good Lord..
 
Open Borders scumbag; he will do anything to make a buck.
He did the John Gambling Radio Show every Friday morning at 9:00.
He hung up on anybody who disagreed with any of his policies.
A ruthless, power hungry egomaniac.
He's great for anyone living off their Stock Portfolio.
Meh, we'll see what happens. Before trump, I thought I'd seen it all. Good Lord..

You have no idea what a piece of shit Bloomberg is.
 
Democrats learned their lesson way back in the early 90's. The best way to get a pervert elected is to siphon votes from the opposing party. Clinton won because Perot ran as a 3rd party candidate. There is no way in the world that the DNC would let Bloomie siphon votes from the Hillary campaign unless there is no Hillary campaign and they are stuck with the old Commie.
 
Open Borders scumbag; he will do anything to make a buck.
He did the John Gambling Radio Show every Friday morning at 9:00.
He hung up on anybody who disagreed with any of his policies.
A ruthless, power hungry egomaniac.
He's great for anyone living off their Stock Portfolio.

Although I never really followed his career, I see him as your typical leftist control freak; a guy that thinks he has enough money to force his commands on everybody else whether they agree with his policies or not. Telling people how much pop they are allowed to purchase or how many rounds they can have in their gun magazine is too parental for me. Stupid policies that solve absolutely nothing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top