Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
"!!!
You can tell the people who don't really understand AGW theory, when they get all excited about snow storms. They don't seem to realize that warmer temps can actually lead to MORE snow in some places! Here's a clue. If temps go up from 20 F to 25 F, it's still going to snow and there will probably be more snow, because warmer air holds more moisture. So thanks for giving us the heads up on another piece of evidence that the globe IS warming.
You can tell the people who don't really understand AGW theory, when they get all excited about snow storms. They don't seem to realize that warmer temps can actually lead to MORE snow in some places! Here's a clue. If temps go up from 20 F to 25 F, it's still going to snow and there will probably be more snow, because warmer air holds more moisture. So thanks for giving us the heads up on another piece of evidence that the globe IS warming.
So tell me this konrad...I will most certainly agree that warm air holds more water....but how does the warmth cause the temperature to drop to create snow? Also if the residence time of water vapor really is 10 days or less, how is it that the effect of warming can possibly last so long?
Hmmm, Dakotas were one of the states I was thinking of looking into for teaching. Maybe I should rethink.
This morning at 6:15, it was 72F here. By 5 it was in low 50's, with those crazy winds. But, NO SNOW!
You can tell the people who don't really understand AGW theory, when they get all excited about snow storms. They don't seem to realize that warmer temps can actually lead to MORE snow in some places! Here's a clue. If temps go up from 20 F to 25 F, it's still going to snow and there will probably be more snow, because warmer air holds more moisture. So thanks for giving us the heads up on another piece of evidence that the globe IS warming.
You can allways tell the faith based believers because according to them EVERYTHING is global warming related!
The world would love to know how you work this magic.
Hmmm, Dakotas were one of the states I was thinking of looking into for teaching. Maybe I should rethink.
This morning at 6:15, it was 72F here. By 5 it was in low 50's, with those crazy winds. But, NO SNOW!
AGW is the reason for all the weather...
You can tell the people who don't really understand AGW theory, when they get all excited about snow storms. They don't seem to realize that warmer temps can actually lead to MORE snow in some places! Here's a clue. If temps go up from 20 F to 25 F, it's still going to snow and there will probably be more snow, because warmer air holds more moisture. So thanks for giving us the heads up on another piece of evidence that the globe IS warming.
You can allways tell the faith based believers because according to them EVERYTHING is global warming related!
The world would love to know how you work this magic.
Who said anything about a temperature drop? I was talking about a RISE. Don't you agree that regardless of whether it's 20 F or 25 F it's still going to snow? That sounds like HIGHER temps to me. I see no need to consider how "warmth" turns to cold, I'm talking COLD and LESS COLD. I don't see what residence time has to do with the matter, either. If a weather system picks up moisture in the Pacific, it would take less than ten days to cross the country, making the "residence time" moot.
You can allways tell the faith based believers because according to them EVERYTHING is global warming related!
The world would love to know how you work this magic.
Who said anything about a temperature drop? I was talking about a RISE. Don't you agree that regardless of whether it's 20 F or 25 F it's still going to snow? That sounds like HIGHER temps to me. I see no need to consider how "warmth" turns to cold, I'm talking COLD and LESS COLD. I don't see what residence time has to do with the matter, either. If a weather system picks up moisture in the Pacific, it would take less than ten days to cross the country, making the "residence time" moot.
Now who is falling back on political bias. Hmmmm?
Who said anything about a temperature drop? I was talking about a RISE. Don't you agree that regardless of whether it's 20 F or 25 F it's still going to snow? That sounds like HIGHER temps to me. I see no need to consider how "warmth" turns to cold, I'm talking COLD and LESS COLD. I don't see what residence time has to do with the matter, either. If a weather system picks up moisture in the Pacific, it would take less than ten days to cross the country, making the "residence time" moot.
Now who is falling back on political bias. Hmmmm?
YOU. Where's the politics in my latest post? I've asked you to answer some questions, but you chose a nonsensical reponse, instead. Why is that? No answer to why a 5 degree rise in temps wouldn't lead to more snow. No answer to why you consider a 10 day residence time to be significant. Seems your trying to distract us from the apparent fact that you're unable to answer basic questions!!!
Now who is falling back on political bias. Hmmmm?
YOU. Where's the politics in my latest post? I've asked you to answer some questions, but you chose a nonsensical reponse, instead. Why is that? No answer to why a 5 degree rise in temps wouldn't lead to more snow. No answer to why you consider a 10 day residence time to be significant. Seems your trying to distract us from the apparent fact that you're unable to answer basic questions!!!
I asked you in my first post how water vapor with only a ten day residence time can carry alllll that extra water into winter. I also asked why all that extra heat was going to make things colder to create the snow in the first place. So far all you've offered are political responses.
Now who is falling back on political bias. Hmmmm?
YOU. Where's the politics in my latest post? I've asked you to answer some questions, but you chose a nonsensical reponse, instead. Why is that? No answer to why a 5 degree rise in temps wouldn't lead to more snow. No answer to why you consider a 10 day residence time to be significant. Seems your trying to distract us from the apparent fact that you're unable to answer basic questions!!!
I asked you in my first post how water vapor with only a ten day residence time can carry alllll that extra water into winter. I also asked why all that extra heat was going to make things colder to create the snow in the first place. So far all you've offered are political responses.
