Blind Right Hates "Liberal Press"

[Full-Auto]

Almost as rare as honest politicians.

Now I grant you this...so then you agree that it helps to be informed, and also to be independent...?

I have posted my lifetime voting record here at this forum no less than ten times:

1956 Eisenhower
1960 Nixon
1964 Goldwater
1968 Nixon
1972 Nixon
1976 Did Not Vote
1980 Anderson(I)
1984 Reagan(wish I had this one back)
1988 Did Not Vote
1992 Did Not Vote
1996 Did Not Vote
2000 Did Not Vote
2004 Kerry *****
2008 Obama *****

***** Voted Against "Spend and Borrow" Republicans

I was a Republican when they stood for balanced budgets, small government and indvidual rights. Now they're in the pockets of corporations and the wealthy PHUCK 'EM

So you vote for the other party that does the same thing.

Your idiocy knows no bounds.

 

[WillowTree]

Ahhh, here it is the Fox News attack.. a very clear indicator of why all the rest of the media is in fact liberal.. they all share a hatred for Fox news.. This idiot you guys call "Presidente.. even tried to shut Fox News down."





so stop with yer protests..

 

[bripat9643]

It ain't complicated....watch something besides Faux for a couple of hours a day. I live in east Tennessee. Not once have I ever gone inside an auto dealership, a garage, a barber shop, the waiting room at a doctor's office etc. where the TV was tuned to anything except Fox News. That's the truth. They watch it because they hear what they want to hear. Doesn't have a goddam thing to do with facts.

What they want to hear is news, not Obama DNC propaganda.

 

[bripat9643]

Almost as rare as honest politicians.

Now I grant you this...so then you agree that it helps to be informed, and also to be independent...?

I have posted my lifetime voting record here at this forum no less than ten times:

1956 Eisenhower
1960 Nixon
1964 Goldwater
1968 Nixon
1972 Nixon
1976 Did Not Vote
1980 Anderson(I)
1984 Reagan(wish I had this one back)
1988 Did Not Vote
1992 Did Not Vote
1996 Did Not Vote
2000 Did Not Vote
2004 Kerry *****
2008 Obama *****

***** Voted Against "Spend and Borrow" Republicans

I was a Republican when they stood for balanced budgets, small government and indvidual rights. Now they're in the pockets of corporations and the wealthy PHUCK 'EM

Nixon and Eisenhower stood for small government and individual rights?

And now you think Kerry and Obama are going to cut spending and balance the budget?

Do you hear everyone in the forum laughing?

 

[Cammmpbell]

Now I grant you this...so then you agree that it helps to be informed, and also to be independent...?

I have posted my lifetime voting record here at this forum no less than ten times:

1956 Eisenhower
1960 Nixon
1964 Goldwater
1968 Nixon
1972 Nixon
1976 Did Not Vote
1980 Anderson(I)
1984 Reagan(wish I had this one back)
1988 Did Not Vote
1992 Did Not Vote
1996 Did Not Vote
2000 Did Not Vote
2004 Kerry *****
2008 Obama *****

***** Voted Against "Spend and Borrow" Republicans

I was a Republican when they stood for balanced budgets, small government and indvidual rights. Now they're in the pockets of corporations and the wealthy PHUCK 'EM

So you vote for the other party that does the same thing.

Your idiocy knows no bounds.

Can't you read

I said I voted against the Republicans. I don't know any other way to accomplish that.

This Is What I Voted Against:

Total U S Debt


09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accomodate Tens of Trillions)

09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32

09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32

09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38(Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)

09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

 

[Seawytch]

Really? What, exactly, wasn't scrutinized regarding President Obama's "past"? What, in your opinion, was "over" scrutinized regarding Bush's? Cite some specific examples of this "pass" that President Obama allegedly got.

When did any of the Obama propaganda organs ask him about his drug use? His association with William Ayers? Reverend Wright?

They're digging into every detail about Gingrich's divorce, but they don't give a hoot that Obama was a heavy drug user?

LOL...and yet we all manage to know about it (except for the "heavy drug use" since that is purely conjecture on your part).

Also, he WAS asked. How could President Obama have responded that Ayers was "just a guy in the neighborhood" if he hadn't been ASKED about it? And then we have President Obama on Reverend Wright:

"I've made a statement yesterday that was hard to make, but it was what I believed, and what we want to do now though is to make sure that this doesn't continue to be a perpetual distraction. I mean it is true that part of the job when you're running for president is that anybody who is tangentially even remotely associated with you is somehow fair game, and that's unfortunate."

Did he volunteer that information without being asked? I think not.

 

[Full-Auto]

I have posted my lifetime voting record here at this forum no less than ten times:

1956 Eisenhower
1960 Nixon
1964 Goldwater
1968 Nixon
1972 Nixon
1976 Did Not Vote
1980 Anderson(I)
1984 Reagan(wish I had this one back)
1988 Did Not Vote
1992 Did Not Vote
1996 Did Not Vote
2000 Did Not Vote
2004 Kerry *****
2008 Obama *****

***** Voted Against "Spend and Borrow" Republicans

I was a Republican when they stood for balanced budgets, small government and indvidual rights. Now they're in the pockets of corporations and the wealthy PHUCK 'EM

So you vote for the other party that does the same thing.

Your idiocy knows no bounds.

Can't you read

I said I voted against the Republicans. I don't know any other way to accomplish that.

This Is What I Voted Against:

Total U S Debt


09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accomodate Tens of Trillions)

09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32

09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32

09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38(Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)

09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

Its called third party or write in like Ive done and will probably do again.

You philosophy states ... Cut off nose to spite face.

 

[bripat9643]

Really? What, exactly, wasn't scrutinized regarding President Obama's "past"? What, in your opinion, was "over" scrutinized regarding Bush's? Cite some specific examples of this "pass" that President Obama allegedly got.

When did any of the Obama propaganda organs ask him about his drug use? His association with William Ayers? Reverend Wright?

They're digging into every detail about Gingrich's divorce, but they don't give a hoot that Obama was a heavy drug user?

LOL...and yet we all manage to know about it (except for the "heavy drug use" since that is purely conjecture on your part).

We only know about it because of FOX News. The network media goons certainly didn't question him about it. His drug use isn't "conjecture." He admitted to it in one of his two autobiographies.

Also, he WAS asked. How could President Obama have responded that Ayers was "just a guy in the neighborhood" if he hadn't been ASKED about it?

Who asked him about it? Did they bring it up every 5 minutes on the prime time newscast?

And then we have President Obama on Reverend Wright:

"I've made a statement yesterday that was hard to make, but it was what I believed, and what we want to do now though is to make sure that this doesn't continue to be a perpetual distraction. I mean it is true that part of the job when you're running for president is that anybody who is tangentially even remotely associated with you is somehow fair game, and that's unfortunate."

Did he volunteer that information without being asked? I think not.

When did the media outlets grill Obama about Reverend Wright? The fact is they never did. Obama was responding to information broadcast by outlets like FOX News. The major media did not even mention Wright for months. They never asked him about Wright or Obama's drug use in the debates. Those issues simply weren't of interest to them.

 

[mudwhistle]

Damn shame they only watch Faux News where the likes of Sean Hannity and Ann Couter quote folks like Lush Rambo and Dennis Miller.

Any American who earns less than $100,000 per year and votes for Republicans needs a mental competency confirmation.

Anyone who votes for Democrats these days wants to screw everyone else and is basically asking for a kick in the crotch.

 

[barry1960]

I have posted my lifetime voting record here at this forum no less than ten times:

1956 Eisenhower
1960 Nixon
1964 Goldwater
1968 Nixon
1972 Nixon
1976 Did Not Vote
1980 Anderson(I)
1984 Reagan(wish I had this one back)
1988 Did Not Vote
1992 Did Not Vote
1996 Did Not Vote
2000 Did Not Vote
2004 Kerry *****
2008 Obama *****

***** Voted Against "Spend and Borrow" Republicans

I was a Republican when they stood for balanced budgets, small government and indvidual rights. Now they're in the pockets of corporations and the wealthy PHUCK 'EM

So you vote for the other party that does the same thing.

Your idiocy knows no bounds.

Can't you read

I said I voted against the Republicans. I don't know any other way to accomplish that.

This Is What I Voted Against:

Total U S Debt


09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accomodate Tens of Trillions)

09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32

09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32

09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38(Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)

09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

I feel for you Cammpbell, posting in a sea of ad hominem idiot conservative attacks. I understand where you are coming from, almost every business in my city runs FOX news because it is precisely what they want to hear. Each time I hear the slogan "Fair and Balanced" I keep thinking of the chant of the sheep in Orwell's Animal Farm 'Four legs good, two legs bad." Pravda would be proud of FOX news for its misdirected slogan.

I also understand your disillusionment with the Republican party. I used to vote Republican, but I cannot stomach the party anymore.

 

[Full-Auto]

So you vote for the other party that does the same thing.

Your idiocy knows no bounds.

Can't you read

I said I voted against the Republicans. I don't know any other way to accomplish that.

This Is What I Voted Against:

Total U S Debt


09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)

09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accomodate Tens of Trillions)

09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32

09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16

09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation)


09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)

09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)

09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32

09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38(Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)

09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00

09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)

09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00

I feel for you Cammpbell, posting in a sea of ad hominem idiot conservative attacks. I understand where you are coming from, almost every business in my city runs FOX news because it is precisely what they want to hear. Each time I hear the slogan "Fair and Balanced" I keep thinking of the chant of the sheep in Orwell's Animal Farm 'Four legs good, two legs bad." Pravda would be proud of FOX news for its misdirected slogan.

I also understand your disillusionment with the Republican party. I used to vote Republican, but I cannot stomach the party anymore.

What are you using for the factual source? The crystal ball? Tarot cards? Hypnotism? Quiji board?

 

[Seawytch]

When did any of the Obama propaganda organs ask him about his drug use? His association with William Ayers? Reverend Wright?

They're digging into every detail about Gingrich's divorce, but they don't give a hoot that Obama was a heavy drug user?

LOL...and yet we all manage to know about it (except for the "heavy drug use" since that is purely conjecture on your part).

We only know about it because of FOX News. The network media goons certainly didn't question him about it. His drug use isn't "conjecture." He admitted to it in one of his two autobiographies.

Also, he WAS asked. How could President Obama have responded that Ayers was "just a guy in the neighborhood" if he hadn't been ASKED about it?

Who asked him about it? Did they bring it up every 5 minutes on the prime time newscast?

And then we have President Obama on Reverend Wright:

"I've made a statement yesterday that was hard to make, but it was what I believed, and what we want to do now though is to make sure that this doesn't continue to be a perpetual distraction. I mean it is true that part of the job when you're running for president is that anybody who is tangentially even remotely associated with you is somehow fair game, and that's unfortunate."

Did he volunteer that information without being asked? I think not.

When did the media outlets grill Obama about Reverend Wright? The fact is they never did. Obama was responding to information broadcast by outlets like FOX News. The major media did not even mention Wright for months. They never asked him about Wright or Obama's drug use in the debates. Those issues simply weren't of interest to them.

With Gingrich, you have a FIRST HAND account from his ex wife. Of course the media is not only going to report on it, but ask about it. How "duh" can you get?

Obama mentioned using drugs in his autobiographies...why would they have to ask about something he already VOLUNTEERED?

We heard about Wright and Ayers for months during the campaign. To suddenly pretend that the "liberal media" kept all that from us is ludicrous.

 

[skookerasbil]

November 7th 2012 FTMFW!!!!

To watch the level of pure misery is going to be one of the truly magical times in my life........and to be sure.......I wont miss the coverage over at MSNBC for anything in the world and I implore my conservative pals to check it out as well. Its gonna be cant miss TV.........absolutely cant miss. To watch those miserable angry fucks squirm like a telephone pole is up their ass for 5 hours is going to be a fcuking hoot.

 

[skookerasbil]

November 7th 2012 FTMFW!!!!

To watch the level of pure misery is going to be one of the truly magical times in my life........and to be sure.......I wont miss the coverage over at MSNBC for anything in the world and I implore my conservative pals to check it out as well. Its gonna be cant miss TV.........absolutely cant miss. To watch those miserable angry fucks squirm like a telephone pole is up their ass for 5 hours is going to be a fcuking hoot.

winning

 

[bripat9643]

Anyone who votes for Democrats these days wants to screw everyone else and is basically asking for a kick in the crotch.

I agree. Every*one who voted for Obama deserves a tongue lashing. I've dished out a few myself.

 

[Intense]

Damn shame they only watch Faux News where the likes of Sean Hannity and Ann Couter quote folks like Lush Rambo and Dennis Miller.

Any American who earns less than $100,000 per year and votes for Republicans needs a mental competency confirmation.

I think the word is pity. Stop projecting.

Liberty has no minimum seating charge Spanky.

 

[paulitician]

Hate em for good reason. And guess what? We also hate Democrat Dummy assholes like you who defend them. So kindly FUCK OFF Sir or Ma'am!

 

[skookerasbil]

Anyone who votes for Democrats these days wants to screw everyone else and is basically asking for a kick in the crotch.

I agree. Every*one who voted for Obama deserves a tongue lashing. I've dished out a few myself.

no worries here Bripat..........he duped millions of independents in 2008. Theyve been onto him him for at least two years now. In the 4 or 5 swing states, its all that'll matter.

All you'll have to do is keep an eye on poll numbers in the follwing states by late summer: Ohio, Virginia, North Carolina, New Hampshire, INdiana and Pennsylvania. The others dont matter.

 

[Intense]

LOL...and yet we all manage to know about it (except for the "heavy drug use" since that is purely conjecture on your part).

We only know about it because of FOX News. The network media goons certainly didn't question him about it. His drug use isn't "conjecture." He admitted to it in one of his two autobiographies.



Who asked him about it? Did they bring it up every 5 minutes on the prime time newscast?

And then we have President Obama on Reverend Wright:

"I've made a statement yesterday that was hard to make, but it was what I believed, and what we want to do now though is to make sure that this doesn't continue to be a perpetual distraction. I mean it is true that part of the job when you're running for president is that anybody who is tangentially even remotely associated with you is somehow fair game, and that's unfortunate."

Did he volunteer that information without being asked? I think not.

When did the media outlets grill Obama about Reverend Wright? The fact is they never did. Obama was responding to information broadcast by outlets like FOX News. The major media did not even mention Wright for months. They never asked him about Wright or Obama's drug use in the debates. Those issues simply weren't of interest to them.

With Gingrich, you have a FIRST HAND account from his ex wife. Of course the media is not only going to report on it, but ask about it. How "duh" can you get?

Obama mentioned using drugs in his autobiographies...why would they have to ask about something he already VOLUNTEERED?

We heard about Wright and Ayers for months during the campaign. To suddenly pretend that the "liberal media" kept all that from us is ludicrous.

My only problem with Newt, is Which Newt? A Morals will usually disappoint you in the end. Liberal Press is in Campaign Mode. Rules never apply there, to think they do is..... for lack of a better word.... Ludicrous.

 

[bripat9643]

With Gingrich, you have a FIRST HAND account from his ex wife. Of course the media is not only going to report on it, but ask about it. How "duh" can you get?

You mean you have a totally uncorroborated accusation from someone with an axe to grind. They are going to report on it because they are liberals in the tank for Obama. That's all there is to it.

Obama mentioned using drugs in his autobiographies...why would they have to ask about something he already VOLUNTEERED?

ROFL! You are truly an idiot. I would think they would want to report on admitted drug use by a presidential nominee, but that was just a big yawn for them. Most people don't even know about it because they've never read his autobiography. We all know what a stink they made about Bush having a drunk driving conviction. They waited until a few days before the election to spring that one on the public for maximum effect.

We heard about Wright and Ayers for months during the campaign. To suddenly pretend that the "liberal media" kept all that from us is ludicrous.

Yep, you heard about it from FOX news and internet sources. The networks never brought it up, and they never questioned Obama about how he could sit in a church for 20 years and not know what kind of man the reverend was.

Everything negative we know about Obama came from sources other than the major news outlets. They had to be dragged kicking and screaming to report on them. They were obviously in the tank for Obama.

End of story.