Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show

hahahahahaha. this stuff has been around since the first Coleman Report in the 60's. obviously true but ohhhhhh so politically incorrect.
 
Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show - The New Observer

They REALLY needed to do a study on this? This is common fucking sense! Hell scores show that poor whites and asians out perform rich blacks! Its not about environment or wealth its about genetics.

Top 12 People with Highest IQ in the World - Listovative

6th smartest person in the world would seem to discredit your claim about genetics. Try again.

"6. Philip Emeagwali (IQ Level- 190)

emeagwali.jpg
 
Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show - The New Observer

They REALLY needed to do a study on this? This is common fucking sense! Hell scores show that poor whites and asians out perform rich blacks! Its not about environment or wealth its about genetics.

Top 12 People with Highest IQ in the World - Listovative

6th smartest person in the world would seem to discredit your claim about genetics. Try again.

"6. Philip Emeagwali (IQ Level- 190)

emeagwali.jpg


are you really retarded enough to think this guy is the 6th smartest in the world? or even the 6th highest IQ?
 
Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show - The New Observer

They REALLY needed to do a study on this? This is common fucking sense! Hell scores show that poor whites and asians out perform rich blacks! Its not about environment or wealth its about genetics.

The article has a clear agenda.

What seems to be the case here is that schools with a majority of students (60%+) that are black will have students, both black and white who are performing badly. The article claims this is somehow genetic. What, the white students in such a school have somehow become genetically black?

Perhaps a lot of these schools are in inner city areas where a lot of people are under-performing for a variety of reasons.

Here's one main point they chose to ignore:

"When the analysis examined variation in density by region and locale, the results showed that schools in the highest density category (60 percent to 100 percent Black students) were mostly located in the South and, to a lesser extent, the Midwest and tended to be in cities"

So the schools they've examined, ones with 60% or more black population, are mostly in the South, which has notoriously done badly for poorer students, and also the midwest, AND they're usually in cities.

Looking at figure 4 you can see that the South has 60% of schools within the range of 40-60% black students and 46% of those students in 60-100% black. Louisiana, for example, has a 30% black population, compared to 13% for the USA as a whole.

Black people have a poverty rate of 25%. White people have 7% poverty.

Poverty in a state like Louisiana is at 20%, and for blacks it will be much higher.

What all this tells us is that education in inner cities is poor, education in the South is poor, education in inner cities in the South is very poor and that falls on blacks the most. Racism is far more abundant in the South, and blacks are held back, and in society they suffer more because of the racism that exists there.

Then this gives the racists an excuse to point to black people being somehow inferior.
 
Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show - The New Observer

They REALLY needed to do a study on this? This is common fucking sense! Hell scores show that poor whites and asians out perform rich blacks! Its not about environment or wealth its about genetics.

Top 12 People with Highest IQ in the World - Listovative

6th smartest person in the world would seem to discredit your claim about genetics. Try again.

"6. Philip Emeagwali (IQ Level- 190)

emeagwali.jpg

That in no way disputes the IQ gap.
 
Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show - The New Observer

They REALLY needed to do a study on this? This is common fucking sense! Hell scores show that poor whites and asians out perform rich blacks! Its not about environment or wealth its about genetics.

The article has a clear agenda.

What seems to be the case here is that schools with a majority of students (60%+) that are black will have students, both black and white who are performing badly. The article claims this is somehow genetic. What, the white students in such a school have somehow become genetically black?

Perhaps a lot of these schools are in inner city areas where a lot of people are under-performing for a variety of reasons.

Here's one main point they chose to ignore:

"When the analysis examined variation in density by region and locale, the results showed that schools in the highest density category (60 percent to 100 percent Black students) were mostly located in the South and, to a lesser extent, the Midwest and tended to be in cities"

So the schools they've examined, ones with 60% or more black population, are mostly in the South, which has notoriously done badly for poorer students, and also the midwest, AND they're usually in cities.

Looking at figure 4 you can see that the South has 60% of schools within the range of 40-60% black students and 46% of those students in 60-100% black. Louisiana, for example, has a 30% black population, compared to 13% for the USA as a whole.

Black people have a poverty rate of 25%. White people have 7% poverty.

Poverty in a state like Louisiana is at 20%, and for blacks it will be much higher.

What all this tells us is that education in inner cities is poor, education in the South is poor, education in inner cities in the South is very poor and that falls on blacks the most. Racism is far more abundant in the South, and blacks are held back, and in society they suffer more because of the racism that exists there.

Then this gives the racists an excuse to point to black people being somehow inferior.

So, all you need to support your theory now is to show how blacks do just fine in nice northern cities away from the Evul Racist South, like in BOston, Baltimore and New York.

Link please.

And if you can't that pretty much shots your "racism" theory full of holes.

Not that you will ever admit that.
 
Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show - The New Observer

They REALLY needed to do a study on this? This is common fucking sense! Hell scores show that poor whites and asians out perform rich blacks! Its not about environment or wealth its about genetics.

Top 12 People with Highest IQ in the World - Listovative

6th smartest person in the world would seem to discredit your claim about genetics. Try again.

"6. Philip Emeagwali (IQ Level- 190)

emeagwali.jpg

That in no way disputes the IQ gap.

IQ correlated with ethnicity assumes existing models of education which frankly suck. Take a sample of each ethnicty and give them all the exact same education, living in the same place, eating the same food, etc. and the disparity vanishes.
 
Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show - The New Observer

They REALLY needed to do a study on this? This is common fucking sense! Hell scores show that poor whites and asians out perform rich blacks! Its not about environment or wealth its about genetics.

Top 12 People with Highest IQ in the World - Listovative

6th smartest person in the world would seem to discredit your claim about genetics. Try again.

"6. Philip Emeagwali (IQ Level- 190)

emeagwali.jpg

That in no way disputes the IQ gap.

IQ correlated with ethnicity assumes existing models of education which frankly suck. Take a sample of each ethnicty and give them all the exact same education, living in the same place, eating the same food, etc. and the disparity vanishes.

Link please.
 
Would love to side with supposed science being Ashkenazi Jewish which seems to always be in 1st place of all other ethnicities. But it just isn't so. Give identical circumstances and everyone learns equally well. But in a system with gross disparity, cultrual priorities, etc. it comes out reflecting those differences.
 
Would love to side with supposed science being Ashkenazi Jewish which seems to always be in 1st place of all other ethnicities. But it just isn't so. Give identical circumstances and everyone learns equally well. But in a system with gross disparity, cultrual priorities, etc. it comes out reflecting those differences.

Pretty to think so.

Link please.
 
Would love to side with supposed science being Ashkenazi Jewish which seems to always be in 1st place of all other ethnicities. But it just isn't so. Give identical circumstances and everyone learns equally well. But in a system with gross disparity, cultrual priorities, etc. it comes out reflecting those differences.


obviously you dont have children
 
Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show - The New Observer

They REALLY needed to do a study on this? This is common fucking sense! Hell scores show that poor whites and asians out perform rich blacks! Its not about environment or wealth its about genetics.

The article has a clear agenda.

What seems to be the case here is that schools with a majority of students (60%+) that are black will have students, both black and white who are performing badly. The article claims this is somehow genetic. What, the white students in such a school have somehow become genetically black?

Perhaps a lot of these schools are in inner city areas where a lot of people are under-performing for a variety of reasons.

Here's one main point they chose to ignore:

"When the analysis examined variation in density by region and locale, the results showed that schools in the highest density category (60 percent to 100 percent Black students) were mostly located in the South and, to a lesser extent, the Midwest and tended to be in cities"

So the schools they've examined, ones with 60% or more black population, are mostly in the South, which has notoriously done badly for poorer students, and also the midwest, AND they're usually in cities.

Looking at figure 4 you can see that the South has 60% of schools within the range of 40-60% black students and 46% of those students in 60-100% black. Louisiana, for example, has a 30% black population, compared to 13% for the USA as a whole.

Black people have a poverty rate of 25%. White people have 7% poverty.

Poverty in a state like Louisiana is at 20%, and for blacks it will be much higher.

What all this tells us is that education in inner cities is poor, education in the South is poor, education in inner cities in the South is very poor and that falls on blacks the most. Racism is far more abundant in the South, and blacks are held back, and in society they suffer more because of the racism that exists there.

Then this gives the racists an excuse to point to black people being somehow inferior.

So, all you need to support your theory now is to show how blacks do just fine in nice northern cities away from the Evul Racist South, like in BOston, Baltimore and New York.

Link please.

And if you can't that pretty much shots your "racism" theory full of holes.

Not that you will ever admit that.

I've done research on other things, in other places, and found that generally this stuff comes down to POVERTY rather than race. There are plenty of other questions, like why are black people more likely to be in poverty, that can be answered in many different ways. However poverty is often a major factor in terms of education. Note this article said black people do better when they're in schools with a lower number of black people.

Are you telling me there aren't racists in the South? Are you telling me the South hasn't suffered from racism for a long time? Really? Really?
 
Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show - The New Observer

They REALLY needed to do a study on this? This is common fucking sense! Hell scores show that poor whites and asians out perform rich blacks! Its not about environment or wealth its about genetics.

The article has a clear agenda.

What seems to be the case here is that schools with a majority of students (60%+) that are black will have students, both black and white who are performing badly. The article claims this is somehow genetic. What, the white students in such a school have somehow become genetically black?

Perhaps a lot of these schools are in inner city areas where a lot of people are under-performing for a variety of reasons.

Here's one main point they chose to ignore:

"When the analysis examined variation in density by region and locale, the results showed that schools in the highest density category (60 percent to 100 percent Black students) were mostly located in the South and, to a lesser extent, the Midwest and tended to be in cities"

So the schools they've examined, ones with 60% or more black population, are mostly in the South, which has notoriously done badly for poorer students, and also the midwest, AND they're usually in cities.

Looking at figure 4 you can see that the South has 60% of schools within the range of 40-60% black students and 46% of those students in 60-100% black. Louisiana, for example, has a 30% black population, compared to 13% for the USA as a whole.

Black people have a poverty rate of 25%. White people have 7% poverty.

Poverty in a state like Louisiana is at 20%, and for blacks it will be much higher.

What all this tells us is that education in inner cities is poor, education in the South is poor, education in inner cities in the South is very poor and that falls on blacks the most. Racism is far more abundant in the South, and blacks are held back, and in society they suffer more because of the racism that exists there.

Then this gives the racists an excuse to point to black people being somehow inferior.

So, all you need to support your theory now is to show how blacks do just fine in nice northern cities away from the Evul Racist South, like in BOston, Baltimore and New York.

Link please.

And if you can't that pretty much shots your "racism" theory full of holes.

Not that you will ever admit that.

I've done research on other things, in other places, and found that generally this stuff comes down to POVERTY rather than race. There are plenty of other questions, like why are black people more likely to be in poverty, that can be answered in many different ways. However poverty is often a major factor in terms of education. Note this article said black people do better when they're in schools with a lower number of black people.

Are you telling me there aren't racists in the South? Are you telling me the South hasn't suffered from racism for a long time? Really? Really?


Like I said it's a fine theory. And all you need now is some evidence to support it.

SOme examples of blacks doing just as well as whites in NOrther CIties, or in Middle Class suburbs would be good.

Plenty of middle class black in the north, far away from the Evul white southerns to provide numbers for your theory.
 
Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show - The New Observer

They REALLY needed to do a study on this? This is common fucking sense! Hell scores show that poor whites and asians out perform rich blacks! Its not about environment or wealth its about genetics.

The article has a clear agenda.

What seems to be the case here is that schools with a majority of students (60%+) that are black will have students, both black and white who are performing badly. The article claims this is somehow genetic. What, the white students in such a school have somehow become genetically black?

Perhaps a lot of these schools are in inner city areas where a lot of people are under-performing for a variety of reasons.

Here's one main point they chose to ignore:

"When the analysis examined variation in density by region and locale, the results showed that schools in the highest density category (60 percent to 100 percent Black students) were mostly located in the South and, to a lesser extent, the Midwest and tended to be in cities"

So the schools they've examined, ones with 60% or more black population, are mostly in the South, which has notoriously done badly for poorer students, and also the midwest, AND they're usually in cities.

Looking at figure 4 you can see that the South has 60% of schools within the range of 40-60% black students and 46% of those students in 60-100% black. Louisiana, for example, has a 30% black population, compared to 13% for the USA as a whole.

Black people have a poverty rate of 25%. White people have 7% poverty.

Poverty in a state like Louisiana is at 20%, and for blacks it will be much higher.

What all this tells us is that education in inner cities is poor, education in the South is poor, education in inner cities in the South is very poor and that falls on blacks the most. Racism is far more abundant in the South, and blacks are held back, and in society they suffer more because of the racism that exists there.

Then this gives the racists an excuse to point to black people being somehow inferior.
What stops Americans from moving to another part of the country where things are better? It's not like they have to move to another country like many of our ancestors did.

We lived in Detroit. My dad got a job at Ford and we got the hell out.
 
Blackest Schools Have Worst Academics, New Official US Statistics Show - The New Observer

They REALLY needed to do a study on this? This is common fucking sense! Hell scores show that poor whites and asians out perform rich blacks! Its not about environment or wealth its about genetics.

The article has a clear agenda.

What seems to be the case here is that schools with a majority of students (60%+) that are black will have students, both black and white who are performing badly. The article claims this is somehow genetic. What, the white students in such a school have somehow become genetically black?

Perhaps a lot of these schools are in inner city areas where a lot of people are under-performing for a variety of reasons.

Here's one main point they chose to ignore:

"When the analysis examined variation in density by region and locale, the results showed that schools in the highest density category (60 percent to 100 percent Black students) were mostly located in the South and, to a lesser extent, the Midwest and tended to be in cities"

So the schools they've examined, ones with 60% or more black population, are mostly in the South, which has notoriously done badly for poorer students, and also the midwest, AND they're usually in cities.

Looking at figure 4 you can see that the South has 60% of schools within the range of 40-60% black students and 46% of those students in 60-100% black. Louisiana, for example, has a 30% black population, compared to 13% for the USA as a whole.

Black people have a poverty rate of 25%. White people have 7% poverty.

Poverty in a state like Louisiana is at 20%, and for blacks it will be much higher.

What all this tells us is that education in inner cities is poor, education in the South is poor, education in inner cities in the South is very poor and that falls on blacks the most. Racism is far more abundant in the South, and blacks are held back, and in society they suffer more because of the racism that exists there.

Then this gives the racists an excuse to point to black people being somehow inferior.

So, all you need to support your theory now is to show how blacks do just fine in nice northern cities away from the Evul Racist South, like in BOston, Baltimore and New York.

Link please.

And if you can't that pretty much shots your "racism" theory full of holes.

Not that you will ever admit that.

I've done research on other things, in other places, and found that generally this stuff comes down to POVERTY rather than race. There are plenty of other questions, like why are black people more likely to be in poverty, that can be answered in many different ways. However poverty is often a major factor in terms of education. Note this article said black people do better when they're in schools with a lower number of black people.

Are you telling me there aren't racists in the South? Are you telling me the South hasn't suffered from racism for a long time? Really? Really?
3 of the most dangerous cities are flint Saginaw and detroit Michigan. That's up north.
 
I for the life of me cannot understand why people still cling to race science even though its been dismissed as pseudoscience, and all books about this topic receive harsh criticism and their methods to determine if race is a factor with intelligence is heavily questioned.

There is a reason why race science isn't taken seriously in the scientific community. One of the criticism some of the books get is by simply looking at white dominated countries and others that are not, and trying to compare them without much (if any) knowledge of the others history on why things are the way there are. A country is not going to be prosperous because its populated by whites, and a country will not necessarily fall apart because of lack of whites.

Why does NO ONE ever talk about human decision or free will? Why does everything have to be IQ? IQ is not morality. IQ is not the will to learn something. IQ is not persistence and practice. IQ is not overall intelligence, and anybody that tries to make it appear so is mislead.
 
I for the life of me cannot understand why people still cling to race science even though its been dismissed as pseudoscience, and all books about this topic receive harsh criticism and their methods to determine if race is a factor with intelligence is heavily questioned.

There is a reason why race science isn't taken seriously in the scientific community. One of the criticism some of the books get is by simply looking at white dominated countries and others that are not, and trying to compare them without much (if any) knowledge of the others history on why things are the way there are. A country is not going to be prosperous because its populated by whites, and a country will not necessarily fall apart because of lack of whites.

Why does NO ONE ever talk about human decision or free will? Why does everything have to be IQ? IQ is not morality. IQ is not the will to learn something. IQ is not persistence and practice. IQ is not overall intelligence, and anybody that tries to make it appear so is mislead.

Because the "harsh criticism" is ideologically driven, as demonstrated on this page, and that is not science.

The rest of your post is strawmen.

A difference of average intelligence means none of those things.


YOur rejection of the concept of IQ is anti-science.

You are stating that we have no ability to measure intelligence.

Really?
 

Forum List

Back
Top