Gerrymandering is now black privilege sanctioned by the High Court:
Note that Cooper v. Harris is being hailed as racial justice when it was nothing more than reaffirming a privilege for one group. Interestingly, non-blacks had a Right taken away from them by the black guy’s race-blind principles:
I am convinced that the Supreme Court will always muster the necessary five votes to reaffirm black privilege that began in the Civil Rights Movement. The only unusual thing that happened in Cooper v Harris is that Clarence Thomas blew his cover:
Cooper v. Harris - Wikipedia
Finally, regardless of the Constitution the Supreme Court always turns a case into a special privilege for one group or another at the expense of everyone else. In fact, black Americans got the most privileges because they are the largest group. Logically, numbers alone dictate that every lesser group demanding a special privilege must worship at racism’s alter.
No Retreat On The Government Choosing Your Doctor
Now, if only every white freak was black the High Court could put every special privilege in one basket.
That's too many blacks in one district, according to the Court. The court tries to make an artificial distinction between gerrymandering by race and by partisanship, but since blacks tend to vote uniformly Democratic, the two are really one and the same.
Liberals passed this disgusting provision of the Voting Rights Act, which requires certain election results, meanig the election of more people of a certain race. But afterward they realized that this provision harmed them if too many blacks were packed in two few districts, so they decided that they no longer liked the Voting Rights Act and no longer want racial gerrymandering.
Liberals passed this disgusting provision of the Voting Rights Act, which requires certain election results, meanig the election of more people of a certain race. But afterward they realized that this provision harmed them if too many blacks were packed in two few districts, so they decided that they no longer liked the Voting Rights Act and no longer want racial gerrymandering.
May 23, 2017
Supreme Court decides only Democrats can use race in gerrymandering
By Ed Straker
Blog: Supreme Court decides only Democrats can use race in gerrymandering
Supreme Court decides only Democrats can use race in gerrymandering
By Ed Straker
Blog: Supreme Court decides only Democrats can use race in gerrymandering
Note that Cooper v. Harris is being hailed as racial justice when it was nothing more than reaffirming a privilege for one group. Interestingly, non-blacks had a Right taken away from them by the black guy’s race-blind principles:
A strange Supreme Court alliance just struck a blow against racial gerrymandering in the United States.
Justice Clarence Thomas joined the four liberal justices to create a majority, following his race-blind principles of equal protection to an unusually progressive result.
XXXXX
Justice Clarence Thomas joined the four liberal justices to create a majority, following his race-blind principles of equal protection to an unusually progressive result.
May 22 2017 6:28 PM
Clarence Thomas Joins Liberals, Shocks World
By Mark Joseph Stern
The Decisive Vote to Strike Down Racial Gerrymandering Came From … Clarence Thomas?
Clarence Thomas Joins Liberals, Shocks World
By Mark Joseph Stern
The Decisive Vote to Strike Down Racial Gerrymandering Came From … Clarence Thomas?
I am convinced that the Supreme Court will always muster the necessary five votes to reaffirm black privilege that began in the Civil Rights Movement. The only unusual thing that happened in Cooper v Harris is that Clarence Thomas blew his cover:
The five concurring judges in the Supreme Court's decision were the four liberal judges-Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor- and the conservative Clarence Thomas. The three dissenting judges were Chief Justice John Roberts, Samuel Alito, and Anthony Kennedy, all of whom issued a partial dissent arguing that they thought one of the districts was constitutional. Neil Gorsuch did not take part in the case, which was argued before he was confirmed to the Supreme Court.
Cooper v. Harris - Wikipedia
Finally, regardless of the Constitution the Supreme Court always turns a case into a special privilege for one group or another at the expense of everyone else. In fact, black Americans got the most privileges because they are the largest group. Logically, numbers alone dictate that every lesser group demanding a special privilege must worship at racism’s alter.
. . . blacks constitute approximately 13 percent of the population. Ambitious blacks feeding at the public trough constitute 3 or 4 percent of the 13 percent. In short: A very few blacks exercise an extraordinary amount of influence over America’s domestic and foreign policies, yet they never stop whining about white racism. I can understand a poor black’s position. I sure as hell will not believe a word ambitious race hustlers say.
No Retreat On The Government Choosing Your Doctor
Now, if only every white freak was black the High Court could put every special privilege in one basket.
