Oh my gosh...even Newsweek is no longer on the bandwagon! Now you boys are really toast!
The pertinant entry is near the end of the column.....
"None of this means we should burn fossil fuels with abandon. There are excellent reasons to limit emissions and switch to cleaner fuelsincluding an estimated 750,000 annual pollution deaths in China, the potential to create jobs at home instead of enriching nasty regimes sitting on oil wells, the need to provide cheap sources of power to the worlds poorest regions, and the still-probable threat that global warming is underway. At the moment, however, certainty about how fastand how muchglobal warming changes the earths climate does not appear to be one of those reasons."
The Backlash Against Climate Scientists - Newsweek
The pertinant entry is near the end of the column.....
"None of this means we should burn fossil fuels with abandon. There are excellent reasons to limit emissions and switch to cleaner fuelsincluding an estimated 750,000 annual pollution deaths in China, the potential to create jobs at home instead of enriching nasty regimes sitting on oil wells, the need to provide cheap sources of power to the worlds poorest regions, and the still-probable threat that global warming is underway. At the moment, however, certainty about how fastand how muchglobal warming changes the earths climate does not appear to be one of those reasons."
The Backlash Against Climate Scientists - Newsweek