Bipartisanship? Not just no, but hell no!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by tjvh, Oct 22, 2012.

  1. tjvh
    Offline

    tjvh Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    6,893
    Thanks Received:
    916
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +916
    I have begun to notice some of the usual lefties on USMB beginning to set themselves up for a Romney victory in several weeks. The phrase "Romney needs to reach across the aisle" (in so many words) is rearing its ugly head. Sorry... It is my feeling that a Romney victory is the American people voting out an ideology, along with a no load President - that is Obama. I see no reason at all for Romney to cater to the left, and decide his policies around any bipartisan compromise with Liberals if he wins. If Obama loses, Liberalism loses and that is how I hope Romney/Ryan approach it. It is high time Liberalism is given the boot, and Republicans give the Democrats the same concern Democrats gave them when Democrats controlled the majority... None. I believe the current "my way, or the highway" politics being practiced by Democrats needs to be responded to in kind. Obama has done one thing very well since he took office... Divide the Nation along racial, and economic lines. The damage has been done. It's time to fix the problems first, and worry about coddling the crybaby losers across the aisle second.
     
  2. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,415
    How'd that "reaching across the aisle" thingy work when Obolshevikcare was being jammed up our asses?
     
  3. tjvh
    Offline

    tjvh Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    6,893
    Thanks Received:
    916
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +916
    Exactly why I don't think it's time for it if Romney gets elected. Fix first, coddle second. :lol:
     
  4. CrusaderFrank
    Offline

    CrusaderFrank Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    88,329
    Thanks Received:
    16,139
    Trophy Points:
    2,210
    Ratings:
    +47,657
    Progs drove the car into the ditch, time they sat back and looked out the window while the grown ups take over
     
  5. Some Guy
    Offline

    Some Guy Deregulated User

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,547
    Thanks Received:
    251
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +400
    Can't disagree much more. Obama blew hit with republicans by employing a similar strategy. Telling them "you lost" doesn't make the other side all too willing to work with you. If Romney wins, it's going to be by some margin resembling 50 to 45, or close to that. That means that still, 45% of the country has some left views and there will be reps there who hold those views. Both parties need to be willing to work together and compromise to get things done that help us, not just gridlock themselves with partisan bullshit.
     
  6. tjvh
    Offline

    tjvh Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    6,893
    Thanks Received:
    916
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +916
    Bipartisanship is demanded when a Republican is in office, when a Democrat holds office it is hardly an afterthought. No, it's time to give back the same considerations to Democrats that they gave Republicans... Again... None.
     
  7. Some Guy
    Offline

    Some Guy Deregulated User

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,547
    Thanks Received:
    251
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +400
    I've been wanting bipartisanship the last 4 years. Whenever some liberal comes out blaming the republicans for obstructionism, my first response is "so it's ok with Obama says "you lost" but it's not ok for the republicans to do it?"

    In my opinion, it's not ok for either party to do it. It's one thing to talk tough on a message board, it's another to actually get shit done. If you're going to be a representative, you don't need to compromise your principles in order to work with someone who holds opposite or different views that do represent the views of some Americans.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. hazlnut
    Offline

    hazlnut Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2012
    Messages:
    11,003
    Thanks Received:
    1,722
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +5,073
    We desperately need a new form of AIDES that only effects people as stupid as you.
     
  9. slackjawed
    Offline

    slackjawed Self deported

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,307
    Thanks Received:
    646
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    15th congressional district of Arizona
    Ratings:
    +647
    :clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

    I agree, we need real leaders, not these pretenders who act like children thinking only of how to advance the side they are on.
     
  10. tjvh
    Offline

    tjvh Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    6,893
    Thanks Received:
    916
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +916
    What... The strain that you have isn't good enough for the rest of us? It's funny... You make a personal attack, and completely dodge the issue... Are you aware how stupid that makes you look?
     

Share This Page