The OP is trying to focus on how immoral our soldiers are.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Is there some point about his being armed or unarmed that's important? Were those men supposed to give him some sort of fightin' chance?
According to rw's, our soldiers should have sent him an invitation to tea.
Let me expand on my previous post:
You don't put on a condom unless you are going to fuck.
And you don't put send special operations into an hostile territory after public enemy numero uno to capture him alive.
We don't send men in to kill the unarmed.
We are not executioners.
Is there some point about his being armed or unarmed that's important? Were those men supposed to give him some sort of fightin' chance?
According to rw's, our soldiers should have sent him an invitation to tea.
why in the fuck do you always put words in someone else's mouth?
We don't send men in to kill the unarmed.
We are not executioners.
It wasn't an execution. He wasn't in custody when he was killed. It was arguably an assassination, but it still happened on the battlefield.
I don't really see the need to nuance here. Anymore than I would blame somebody for smothering baby Hitler in his crib.
Some people just deserve to die.
thats all well an good and considering both of our backgrounds, we agree, BUT, lets not pretend that this is not some new love for killing folks that need killing. what was bad is now ho hum or acceptable.
1 admin. had to fight to the SC and lose ala extending habeus corpus to non citizens who were in all likelihood terrorists, yet now we JDAM amercian citizens and nary a word is heard, in fact Harold Koh twsited himself into a virtual semantic pretzel justifying that killing while he railed against bush for lesser evils and my point being he is far from alone.
and hey whatever happened to - collateral damage?
Didn't know you were blood thirsty for vengeance.
Considering your stance on the a-bombing of Japan
bin Laden was an enemy competent of the United States of America.
Quit whining that we killed him.
We don't send men in to kill the unarmed.
We are not executioners.
Yes we are, and Mr Obama owns it.
His decision, his action, his choice.
Liberals have to decide if that is the type of president they want.
I want the guy who gets the asshole who ordered several thousand people die for no other reason then he's somehow "pissed" that the Saudis asked America to defend them against Iraq.
And that's what we got.
Bin Laden signed his death warrant in American Blood.
The five thousand in the towers were un-armed, and the ones in the planes were un-armed, so I look at it as and eye for and eye, and a tooth for a tooth OBL, that is what I say (justice was served).. End of story.I could care less if he was unarmed......
Against the enemies of the United States whom seek to destroy and kill us abroad ? YES!Yes we are, and Mr Obama owns it.
His decision, his action, his choice.
Liberals have to decide if that is the type of president they want.
I want the guy who gets the asshole who ordered several thousand people die for no other reason then he's somehow "pissed" that the Saudis asked America to defend them against Iraq.
And that's what we got.
Bin Laden signed his death warrant in American Blood.
Do you agree with the government sanctioning assassination?
Yes we are, and Mr Obama owns it.
His decision, his action, his choice.
Liberals have to decide if that is the type of president they want.
I want the guy who gets the asshole who ordered several thousand people die for no other reason then he's somehow "pissed" that the Saudis asked America to defend them against Iraq.
And that's what we got.
Bin Laden signed his death warrant in American Blood.
Do you agree with the government sanctioning assassination?
The OP is trying to focus on how immoral our soldiers are.
Let me expand on my previous post:
You don't put on a condom unless you are going to fuck.
And you don't put send special operations into an hostile territory after public enemy numero uno to capture him alive.
We don't send men in to kill the unarmed.
We are not executioners.
Can, have, and presumably still will. We did it in Vietnam, with the Phoenix Program, among other things; more than one VC leader "disappeared". All's fair in war. We caught a VC courier one day, literally with his drawers down; he had put his Chicom Type 56 down, to relieve himself. I cut his throat, before he finished; can't say I ever lost any sleep over that. I suppose you think I should have let him pick up his weapon first, and shot it out with him instead? Do excuse me for NOT wanting to wake up every bad guy in the vicinity.
bin Laden was an enemy competent of the United States of America.
Quit whining that we killed him.
oh really? and why not? oh becasue we would have to put him in gitmo where we have been told for years anyway, that putting folks there fed Islamic fundamentalism ? little late to the religion party, they didn't capture him or even attempt to becasue he would be an embarrassment to an admin. that proposed and promised to close Gitmo. He died, in part, to protect obamas political ass.
so take that danger to the troops, rendition ( which we still practice too) and the extra-legal/ extrajudicial killings and stick them where the sun doesn't shine, you simply lack the intellectual honesty to say so, so you fall back on the tired bullshit to excuse obama, after using the very same tired bullshit you and your like here to fore took bush to task for. Hackasaurus.
I served this country for 20 years in the Armed Forces (specifically the Navy).
What did YOU do for this country?
Your status as a Vet is not a proper response.
You claimed the best trained men in the world couldn't have captured obl.
I ignored the stupidity of the comment, until you trumped it with; Well I'm a vet, so there.