Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Once again, for the benefit of those who were absent on the first day of school....
Taxed
Enough
Already.
Please learn. There will be a pop quiz.
Oh, give me a break. Don't be so disingenuous. You know, I know and everybody knows why they chose the tea party moniker. The fact that it makes a little anagram that fits their political set up is nice and fluffy and all that, but please, don't try and think we're all idiots....
The TEA Parties takes its moniker from an historic event. One about taxes. Can you grasp that concept... the similarities between the original event and the current issue?
I believe you meant to say "uncomfortably true".What's stupid about it? Statists support big oppressive government. King George had a big oppressive government. Statists don't support individual liberty. The FF did.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Is there a stupidity competition going on that I'm not aware of?
Do I need to use smaller words?
No, you need to use less ridiculous words.
Yea, cuz absolutely no one has mentioned that in the past week.
And, for the umpteenth time... Palin explained the 'don't retreat, reload' remark back during the campaign. When she first used it. 'Reload' - back the ballot box. Try and keep up. Or, alternatively, continue making yourself look like you don't know what you're talking about. Either is fine.
Why the rhetoric with Palin then. Why not just say "go to the ballot box"? Because it's not as effective and she (and many other pollies) like to ramp up the rhetoric...shrug...
As for not knowing what I'm talking about, you mean like telling people not to speak on behalf of the FF's and then doing exactly that like you just did?
She formed an educated opinion and prefaced it with "I think...", which I hope all of us could distinguish as not attempting to speak on behalf of anyone.
Why the rhetoric with Palin then. Why not just say "go to the ballot box"? Because it's not as effective and she (and many other pollies) like to ramp up the rhetoric...shrug...
As for not knowing what I'm talking about, you mean like telling people not to speak on behalf of the FF's and then doing exactly that like you just did?
She formed an educated opinion and prefaced it with "I think...", which I hope all of us could distinguish as not attempting to speak on behalf of anyone.
i wish palin's opinion about anything was educated.
I believe you meant to say "uncomfortably true".What's stupid about it? Statists support big oppressive government. King George had a big oppressive government. Statists don't support individual liberty. The FF did.
Do I need to use smaller words?
No, you need to use less ridiculous words.
Why the rhetoric with Palin then. Why not just say "go to the ballot box"? Because it's not as effective and she (and many other pollies) like to ramp up the rhetoric...shrug...
As for not knowing what I'm talking about, you mean like telling people not to speak on behalf of the FF's and then doing exactly that like you just did?
She formed an educated opinion and prefaced it with "I think...", which I hope all of us could distinguish as not attempting to speak on behalf of anyone.
i wish palin's opinion about anything was educated.
A bigger government IS a more oppressive government. Less gov't = more freedom. It's a simple equation.I believe you meant to say "uncomfortably true".No, you need to use less ridiculous words.
O....Kay....
For the sake of argument, lets say I agree that the Dems want a "Bigger government." Can you please direct me to where anyone, here or anyone else, has said they wish we had a "More oppressive government?"
A bigger government IS a more oppressive government. Less gov't = more freedom. It's a simple equation.I believe you meant to say "uncomfortably true".
O....Kay....
For the sake of argument, lets say I agree that the Dems want a "Bigger government." Can you please direct me to where anyone, here or anyone else, has said they wish we had a "More oppressive government?"
Why the rhetoric with Palin then. Why not just say "go to the ballot box"? Because it's not as effective and she (and many other pollies) like to ramp up the rhetoric...shrug...
As for not knowing what I'm talking about, you mean like telling people not to speak on behalf of the FF's and then doing exactly that like you just did?
She formed an educated opinion and prefaced it with "I think...", which I hope all of us could distinguish as not attempting to speak on behalf of anyone.
i wish palin's opinion about anything was educated.
Sarah is actually a diamond in the rough, new and fresh to politics. Some democrats who have been elected have no excuses for their stupidity.
If you can point to a big government in history that offered more freedom to its citizens than a smaller government, go right ahead, but history isn't going to be too cooperative.A bigger government IS a more oppressive government. Less gov't = more freedom. It's a simple equation.O....Kay....
For the sake of argument, lets say I agree that the Dems want a "Bigger government." Can you please direct me to where anyone, here or anyone else, has said they wish we had a "More oppressive government?"
Mmmm-hmmm.
Have you ever considered it's your thought process that's simple?
Really grump what is it that you find so funny? I see nothing funny with Daves comment.
the Founders were individuals. They disagreed among themselves. They fought. They argued.
Bingo. Some would support the tea people (though I'm not quite sure who), and some, believe it or not, would agree with the Democrats.
It would just set my heart aflutter if I could hear a conservative admit that simple statement; "Some would agree with the Democrats."
Really grump what is it that you find so funny? I see nothing funny with Daves comment.
The fact your founding fathers supported individual liberty...they didn't,,,,
You mean like those maps on Palin's website with crosshairs on them? That kind of civility? To 'lock and reload'? That what you talking about?
so you're blaming Palin for the shootings?
Not even talking about the shootings. Talking about civil war....apparently....
A bigger government IS a more oppressive government. Less gov't = more freedom. It's a simple equation.I believe you meant to say "uncomfortably true".
O....Kay....
For the sake of argument, lets say I agree that the Dems want a "Bigger government." Can you please direct me to where anyone, here or anyone else, has said they wish we had a "More oppressive government?"
