Big win for believers in the Constitution.

But every state is required to honor Constitutional law. Does the right to bear arms sound familiar.
At 48 years old I've had more training and experience with firearms than the majority of police officers I've met.
so what National Guard post do you belong to? If you aren't in any position of authority, given by U.S. society, how do the rest of us know that you are not, for instance, some cheap KKK whore willing to fire at anything? Why should your fellow Americans trust your judgment in a pinch? Gun totters are cheap little "men" with big egos and no brains, and are not fit to walk around in American society. If you want to go around carrying a gun, get your law-enforcement credentials. You are not entitled to exercise any authority at all until you do. You are trying to usurp authority and make yourself some sort of authority or king. This is pure bullshit. We Americans will not tolerate thugs, even if they are small-penis white guys with a bad attitude. Don't think that you are fxxking Rambo. Turn off the movies.
Hate to break it to you but there is NO requirement to belong to a militia to own possess and carry firearms. It is an individual right not connected to service in a militia.
Actually, it is. When this amendment was written, the writers feared that the British would come back, which they did in 1812 (remember them burning the White House) and wanted to provide for all able-bodied men to be ready to fight them and protect the fledgling U.S. government. The amendment does not go any further than to allow citizens to keep their arms in event of an attack by a foreign nation. Now we have the National Guard. This "individual right" has strings attached.
Wrong dumb ass the Supreme Court ruled the 2nd has no requirement to belong to a militia,catch up with what is the law of the land.
Pretty fucked-up ruling. Why should any ignorant shit be allowed to walk around with a gun? Remember what happened to Karen Steinle. Do you think that this is okay?
Shot by a felon who shouldn't have been in the country to begin with. Liberal run sanctuary cities are to blame for that shit.
 
so what National Guard post do you belong to? If you aren't in any position of authority, given by U.S. society, how do the rest of us know that you are not, for instance, some cheap KKK whore willing to fire at anything? Why should your fellow Americans trust your judgment in a pinch? Gun totters are cheap little "men" with big egos and no brains, and are not fit to walk around in American society. If you want to go around carrying a gun, get your law-enforcement credentials. You are not entitled to exercise any authority at all until you do. You are trying to usurp authority and make yourself some sort of authority or king. This is pure bullshit. We Americans will not tolerate thugs, even if they are small-penis white guys with a bad attitude. Don't think that you are fxxking Rambo. Turn off the movies.
Hate to break it to you but there is NO requirement to belong to a militia to own possess and carry firearms. It is an individual right not connected to service in a militia.
Actually, it is. When this amendment was written, the writers feared that the British would come back, which they did in 1812 (remember them burning the White House) and wanted to provide for all able-bodied men to be ready to fight them and protect the fledgling U.S. government. The amendment does not go any further than to allow citizens to keep their arms in event of an attack by a foreign nation. Now we have the National Guard. This "individual right" has strings attached.
Wrong dumb ass the Supreme Court ruled the 2nd has no requirement to belong to a militia,catch up with what is the law of the land.
Pretty fucked-up ruling. Why should any ignorant shit be allowed to walk around with a gun? Remember what happened to Karen Steinle. Do you think that this is okay?

its the Constitution- if we the people don't want it we can change the Constitution.

We can however make it illegal for mentally incompetants to own guns- along with convicted criminals.
Those laws are already on the books
 
since law abiding members of society do not commit murder nor shoot innocent people and since over 99 percent of the population is not shooting people why would you have a problem with them owning possessing and carrying firearms?

Objection to law-abiding citizens being allowed to bear arms is nearly always rooted in a desire or intent to engage in activity which would give the law-abiding citizen just cause to use his arms against the one having the objection.
 

Forum List

Back
Top