Big Texas Gov't's hateful war on women costs Texas' taxpayers

Star

Gold Member
Apr 5, 2009
2,532
614
190
Texas Loses Entire Women's Health Program Over Planned Parenthood Law




Laura Bassett

03/15/2012



The Department of Health and Human Services announced on Thursday that it will cut off all Medicaid funding for family planning to the state of Texas, following Gov. Rick Perry's (R) decision to implement a new law that excludes Planned Parenthood from the state's Medicaid Women's Health Program.


Cindy Mann, director of the Center for Medicaid and State Operations (CMSO), wrote Texas health officials a letter on Thursday explaining that the state broke federal Medicaid rules by discriminating against qualified family planning providers and thus would be losing the entire program, which provides cancer screenings, contraceptives and basic health care to 130,000 low-income women each year.


"We very much regret the state's decision to implement this rule, which will prevent women enrolled in the program from receiving services from the trusted health care providers they have chosen and relied upon for their care," she wrote. "In light of Texas' actions, CMS is not in a position to extend or renew the current [Medicaid contract]."


The federal government pays for nearly 90 percent of Texas' $40 million Women's Health Program, and nearly half of the program's providers in Texas are Planned Parenthood clinics. But the new law that went into effect earlier this month disqualified Planned Parenthood from participating in the program because some of its clinics provide abortions, even though no state or federal money can be used to pay for those abortions.


According to Medicaid law, Mann said, a state cannot restrict women's ability to choose a provider simply because that provider offers separate services -- in this case, abortion -- that aren’t even paid for by the Medicaid program.


Perry wrote a letter to President Obama earlier this month accusing his administration of "mandating which health providers the state of Texas must use" in order to "continue to support abortion providers like Planned Parenthood." He vowed to continue the Women's Health Program in Texas without Planned Parenthood and without federal money, although he has yet to outline how his state will come up with money.


But an HHS spokesperson told reporters on Thursday that this was not Obama's decision and that the administration's hands are tied on the issue. “Medicaid law is very clear; a state may not restrict patients’ choice of providers of services like mammograms and other cancer screenings, if those providers are qualified to deliver care covered by Medicaid. Patients, not state government officials, should be able to choose the doctors and other health care providers that are best for them and their families. In 2005, Texas requested this same authority to restrict patients’ choices, and the Bush Administration did not grant it to them either.”
 
I watch this kind of policy implementation in total amazment.

Does the GOP really want to lose the upcoming election?
 
tax dollars for abortions


that's damn low as you can get.

but if they spent money to fuck over arms rights, yall commie fucks would be doing the wave

Can't even read? They are prohibited from spending tax dollars on abortions.

PP main job is abortions.

They are known for not caring about the law, as they will get teens abortion w/o parent consent or knowledge, even if it means taking her across state lines.
 
Who didn't see this coming...The Obama administration CUTS OF THE FUNDING. but it's the Republican fault..

Perry should tell them to go to hell
 
tax dollars for abortions


that's damn low as you can get.

but if they spent money to fuck over arms rights, yall commie fucks would be doing the wave

Can't even read? They are prohibited from spending tax dollars on abortions.

PP main job is abortions.

They are known for not caring about the law, as they will get teens abortion w/o parent consent or knowledge, even if it means taking her across state lines.

You did not address the issue of PP being prohibited from preforming abortions with tax dollars.
 
Can't even read? They are prohibited from spending tax dollars on abortions.

PP main job is abortions.

They are known for not caring about the law, as they will get teens abortion w/o parent consent or knowledge, even if it means taking her across state lines.

You did not address the issue of PP being prohibited from preforming abortions with tax dollars.

:lol:

you really gunna split that hair?

they get tax money, they do abortions


you put my money and your money in thier pot, they kill a baby with it the money in that pot, they spent my money to kill a baby.

there is no grey area except in make believe land
 
Can't even read? They are prohibited from spending tax dollars on abortions.

PP main job is abortions.

They are known for not caring about the law, as they will get teens abortion w/o parent consent or knowledge, even if it means taking her across state lines.

You did not address the issue of PP being prohibited from preforming abortions with tax dollars.

And you really believe people are stupid enough to believe that lie?
of course this did come from the Hufferpost.
 
Who didn't see this coming...The Obama administration CUTS OF THE FUNDING. but it's the Republican fault..

Perry should tell them to go to hell




Did you miss this----->"In 2005, Texas requested this same authority to restrict patients’ choices, and the Bush Administration did not grant it to them either.”<-----part of the OP?
 
Who didn't see this coming...The Obama administration CUTS OF THE FUNDING. but it's the Republican fault..

Federal law is pretty clear on this point. Texas decided to go in a direction that no longer allows the feds to fund their 1115 waiver. CMS put out a handy informational bulletin last summer recapping how Medicaid works.

Medicaid Requirement of Freedom of Choice

We have received some inquiries as to whether States may exclude certain providers from participating in Medicaid based on their scope of practice, as well as a proposed state plan amendment presenting the same question, and we thought a review of longstanding federal law would be helpful to States.

States have authority to exclude providers from participating in Medicaid under certain circumstances, and indeed in some situations federal law requires exclusion. States are required, for example, to exclude providers that commit fraud or certain criminal acts. States are not, however, permitted to exclude providers from the program solely on the basis of the range of medical services they provide. Under federal law Medicaid beneficiaries may obtain medical services "from any institution, agency, community pharmacy, or person, qualified to perform the service or services required . . . who undertakes to provide him such services." (Section 1902(a)(23) of Title XIX of the Social Security Act (the Act)) This provision is often referred to as the "any willing provider" or "free choice of provider" provision.

Federal Medicaid funding of abortion services is not permitted under federal law except in extraordinary circumstances (in cases of rape, incest, or when the life of the woman would be in danger). At the same time, Medicaid programs may not exclude qualified health care providers—whether an individual provider, a physician group, an outpatient clinic, or a hospital—from providing services under the program because they separately provide abortion services (not funded by federal Medicaid dollars, consistent with the federal prohibition) as part of their scope of practice.

If Texas doesn't want to play by the rules, they're not required to play at all. And thus their waiver isn't getting renewed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top