Biden: U.S. won't play favorites between Israelis, Palestinians

CrimsonWhite

*****istrator Emeritus
Mar 13, 2006
7,978
1,780
123
Guntucky
Interesting position considering that Israel is an ally. Israel is a legally established state and the PA is a terrorist insurgency. How hard is that for people to understand?

Ramallah, West Bank (CNN) -- The United States will hold both Israel and the Palestinians responsible for any steps that make peace between them more difficult, Vice President Joe Biden said Wednesday.

Biden, in the region meeting Israeli and Palestinian leaders, repeated strong criticism he made of an Israeli move a day earlier.

He said Tuesday he "condemned" Israel's decision to build 1,600 new apartments on land which both Israel and the Palestinians claim.

The Palestinians contend the area is in East Jerusalem; Israel's Interior Ministry says it is not.

Biden: U.S. won't play favorites between Israelis, Palestinians - CNN.com
 
The US won't play favorites against these pieces of shiite?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogNdQ-CSQww]YouTube - palestinians cheer on 911 - now they want our pitty[/ame]
 
The US won't play favorites against these pieces of shiite?
YouTube - palestinians cheer on 911 - now they want our pitty

Israelis were caught dancing, too on 9/11 - right next to a white van they had positioned in New Jersey, directly across from the Twin Towers. They had set up video cameras and had even photographed themselves "high-fiving" each other in front of the wreckage in the background.

Oh and don't forget what Ben had to say:

"It's very good."
- Current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, when asked what the 9/11 attacks means for relations between the US and Israel, quoted in the New York Times, September 12, 2001
 
Won't play favorites? Right!
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w8FJFZy_js8]YouTube - Biden: I am a zionist / soy un sionista[/ame]
 
Interesting position considering that Israel is an ally. Israel is a legally established state and the PA is a terrorist insurgency. How hard is that for people to understand?

Ramallah, West Bank (CNN) -- The United States will hold both Israel and the Palestinians responsible for any steps that make peace between them more difficult, Vice President Joe Biden said Wednesday.

Biden, in the region meeting Israeli and Palestinian leaders, repeated strong criticism he made of an Israeli move a day earlier.

He said Tuesday he "condemned" Israel's decision to build 1,600 new apartments on land which both Israel and the Palestinians claim.

The Palestinians contend the area is in East Jerusalem; Israel's Interior Ministry says it is not.

Biden: U.S. won't play favorites between Israelis, Palestinians - CNN.com

This, of course, is not true. From the beginning, the Obama administration's ham fisted Israeli-Arab policy has strongly favored the Arab positions. In his Cairo speech, Obama repeated arguments used to question the legitimacy of the state of Israel when he claimed the UN had only created Israel because of emotions created by the Holocaust and he called all Israeli settlements illegitimate, including Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem, Israel's Capital, as "settlements".

Obama's appointment of George Mitchell as his special envoy has to be seen as a deliberate slap in the face to Israel. In 2000, Clinton was forced to recall Mitchell from the area because he had so offended the Israeli government that Ehud Barak, then PM and now DM, had ordered the Israeli government not to talk to Mitchell with the result that not only would no one in the government meet with him but they also stopped returning his calls.

In case anyone still didn't understand the Obama administration's determination to create a hostile international environment for Israel, Obama told Abbas that he would bring down the Netanyahu government and help to install one more favorable to the Arab positions, thus leading to Abbas' hardline positions and his refusal to enter into direct talks with the Israeli government.

The Obama administration cannot at once support partisan positions on the issues and claim to be an honest broker in mediating talks between Israel and the Arabs. If these talks were to be taken seriously at all, it was necessary for Israel to first respond to Obama's provocative words and actions and to confront his strongly pro Arab positions on the Issues before dealing with the PA. Seen in this context, Biden's petulantly late arrival for dinner with the Netanyahus and his outrageous condemnation of Israel's announcement of new building permits in its Capital is just a continuation of the Obama administration's pro Arab attitudes and positions.
 
Interesting position considering that Israel is an ally. Israel is a legally established state and the PA is a terrorist insurgency. How hard is that for people to understand?

Ramallah, West Bank (CNN) -- The United States will hold both Israel and the Palestinians responsible for any steps that make peace between them more difficult, Vice President Joe Biden said Wednesday.

Biden, in the region meeting Israeli and Palestinian leaders, repeated strong criticism he made of an Israeli move a day earlier.

He said Tuesday he "condemned" Israel's decision to build 1,600 new apartments on land which both Israel and the Palestinians claim.

The Palestinians contend the area is in East Jerusalem; Israel's Interior Ministry says it is not.

Biden: U.S. won't play favorites between Israelis, Palestinians - CNN.com

This, of course, is not true. From the beginning, the Obama administration's ham fisted Israeli-Arab policy has strongly favored the Arab positions. In his Cairo speech, Obama repeated arguments used to question the legitimacy of the state of Israel when he claimed the UN had only created Israel because of emotions created by the Holocaust and he called all Israeli settlements illegitimate, including Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem, Israel's Capital, as "settlements".

Obama's appointment of George Mitchell as his special envoy has to be seen as a deliberate slap in the face to Israel. In 2000, Clinton was forced to recall Mitchell from the area because he had so offended the Israeli government that Ehud Barak, then PM and now DM, had ordered the Israeli government not to talk to Mitchell with the result that not only would no one in the government meet with him but they also stopped returning his calls.

In case anyone still didn't understand the Obama administration's determination to create a hostile international environment for Israel, Obama told Abbas that he would bring down the Netanyahu government and help to install one more favorable to the Arab positions, thus leading to Abbas' hardline positions and his refusal to enter into direct talks with the Israeli government.

The Obama administration cannot at once support partisan positions on the issues and claim to be an honest broker in mediating talks between Israel and the Arabs. If these talks were to be taken seriously at all, it was necessary for Israel to first respond to Obama's provocative words and actions and to confront his strongly pro Arab positions on the Issues before dealing with the PA. Seen in this context, Biden's petulantly late arrival for dinner with the Netanyahus and his outrageous condemnation of Israel's announcement of new building permits in its Capital is just a continuation of the Obama administration's pro Arab attitudes and positions.

Is that why Obama folded like a cheap tent when Israel did not stop settlements?
 
Interesting position considering that Israel is an ally. Israel is a legally established state and the PA is a terrorist insurgency. How hard is that for people to understand?

This, of course, is not true. From the beginning, the Obama administration's ham fisted Israeli-Arab policy has strongly favored the Arab positions. In his Cairo speech, Obama repeated arguments used to question the legitimacy of the state of Israel when he claimed the UN had only created Israel because of emotions created by the Holocaust and he called all Israeli settlements illegitimate, including Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem, Israel's Capital, as "settlements".

Obama's appointment of George Mitchell as his special envoy has to be seen as a deliberate slap in the face to Israel. In 2000, Clinton was forced to recall Mitchell from the area because he had so offended the Israeli government that Ehud Barak, then PM and now DM, had ordered the Israeli government not to talk to Mitchell with the result that not only would no one in the government meet with him but they also stopped returning his calls.

In case anyone still didn't understand the Obama administration's determination to create a hostile international environment for Israel, Obama told Abbas that he would bring down the Netanyahu government and help to install one more favorable to the Arab positions, thus leading to Abbas' hardline positions and his refusal to enter into direct talks with the Israeli government.

The Obama administration cannot at once support partisan positions on the issues and claim to be an honest broker in mediating talks between Israel and the Arabs. If these talks were to be taken seriously at all, it was necessary for Israel to first respond to Obama's provocative words and actions and to confront his strongly pro Arab positions on the Issues before dealing with the PA. Seen in this context, Biden's petulantly late arrival for dinner with the Netanyahus and his outrageous condemnation of Israel's announcement of new building permits in its Capital is just a continuation of the Obama administration's pro Arab attitudes and positions.

Is that why Obama folded like a cheap tent when Israel did not stop settlements?

Obama was forced to back off from his positions because there was no support for them from the American public, which supports Israel over the Arabs by a ratio of four to one, or from the Cogress which has consistently supported Israel over the Arabs by very large margins.

Israel/Palestinians
 
This, of course, is not true. From the beginning, the Obama administration's ham fisted Israeli-Arab policy has strongly favored the Arab positions. In his Cairo speech, Obama repeated arguments used to question the legitimacy of the state of Israel when he claimed the UN had only created Israel because of emotions created by the Holocaust and he called all Israeli settlements illegitimate, including Jewish neighborhoods in Jerusalem, Israel's Capital, as "settlements".

Obama's appointment of George Mitchell as his special envoy has to be seen as a deliberate slap in the face to Israel. In 2000, Clinton was forced to recall Mitchell from the area because he had so offended the Israeli government that Ehud Barak, then PM and now DM, had ordered the Israeli government not to talk to Mitchell with the result that not only would no one in the government meet with him but they also stopped returning his calls.

In case anyone still didn't understand the Obama administration's determination to create a hostile international environment for Israel, Obama told Abbas that he would bring down the Netanyahu government and help to install one more favorable to the Arab positions, thus leading to Abbas' hardline positions and his refusal to enter into direct talks with the Israeli government.

The Obama administration cannot at once support partisan positions on the issues and claim to be an honest broker in mediating talks between Israel and the Arabs. If these talks were to be taken seriously at all, it was necessary for Israel to first respond to Obama's provocative words and actions and to confront his strongly pro Arab positions on the Issues before dealing with the PA. Seen in this context, Biden's petulantly late arrival for dinner with the Netanyahus and his outrageous condemnation of Israel's announcement of new building permits in its Capital is just a continuation of the Obama administration's pro Arab attitudes and positions.

Is that why Obama folded like a cheap tent when Israel did not stop settlements?

Obama was forced to back off from his positions because there was no support for them from the American public, which supports Israel over the Arabs by a ratio of four to one, or from the Cogress which has consistently supported Israel over the Arabs by very large margins.

Israel/Palestinians

"...the American public, which supports Israel over the Arabs by a ratio of four to one,..." due to a lifetime of propaganda.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ziSTY408h6k]YouTube - Off the Charts[/ame]
ei: Killings of dozens once again called "period of calm" by US media
 
Is that why Obama folded like a cheap tent when Israel did not stop settlements?

Obama was forced to back off from his positions because there was no support for them from the American public, which supports Israel over the Arabs by a ratio of four to one, or from the Cogress which has consistently supported Israel over the Arabs by very large margins.

Israel/Palestinians

"...the American public, which supports Israel over the Arabs by a ratio of four to one,..." due to a lifetime of propaganda.

The American public supports Israel because of shared democratic values and an embrace of freedom, human rights and civil liberties, otherwise, absent from the Arab Muslim Middle East.

Arabs and Muslims have also historically been opposed to US interests, such as siding with the Nazis and the Soviets and Pallies siding with Iraq in the Gulf War.

You are the Forum Dunce.
 
Obama was forced to back off from his positions because there was no support for them from the American public, which supports Israel over the Arabs by a ratio of four to one, or from the Cogress which has consistently supported Israel over the Arabs by very large margins.

Israel/Palestinians

"...the American public, which supports Israel over the Arabs by a ratio of four to one,..." due to a lifetime of propaganda.

The American public supports Israel because of shared democratic values and an embrace of freedom, human rights and civil liberties, otherwise, absent from the Arab Muslim Middle East.

Arabs and Muslims have also historically been opposed to US interests, such as siding with the Nazis and the Soviets and Pallies siding with Iraq in the Gulf War.

You are the Forum Dunce.

Yep, that is part of the propaganda.
 
"...the American public, which supports Israel over the Arabs by a ratio of four to one,..." due to a lifetime of propaganda.

The American public supports Israel because of shared democratic values and an embrace of freedom, human rights and civil liberties, otherwise, absent from the Arab Muslim Middle East.

Arabs and Muslims have also historically been opposed to US interests, such as siding with the Nazis and the Soviets and Pallies siding with Iraq in the Gulf War.

You are the Forum Dunce.

Yep, that is part of the propaganda.

Then, Bill Clinton and Colin Powell are propagandists.

Bill Clinton...
Our relationship would never vary from its allegiance to the shared values, the shared religious heritage, the shared democratic politics which have made the relationship between the United States and Israel a special—even on occasion a wonderful—relationship.

Bill Clinton...
American and Israel share a special bond. Our relationship is unique among all nations. Like America, Israel is a strong democracy, a symbol of freedom, and an oasis of liberty, a home to the oppressed and persecuted.

Colin Powell...
Since Israel's establishment over 50 years ago, the United States has had an enduring, an ironclad commitment, to Israel's security. The United States-Israeli relationship is based on the broadest conception of American national interest in which our two nations are bound forever together by common democratic values and traditions. This will never change.

You are the Forum Dunce.
 

Forum List

Back
Top