Biden: Clear 'Mandate' to Raise Taxes

No, what is clear is that the American people want a balanced approach to cutting the debt. one where everyone shares the load. From the wealthy with a *gasp* return to the Clinton tax rates, to the middle class, poor and elderly with cuts and revamping of programs....This has been Obama's platform all along.

He laid it out in the debates....showed a link to look at it in his campaign ads and told Americans to look at his proposals and to look at Romney's.....then make a decision......they did.

What is clear is that Americans want exactly what they've had for the last 2 years.

We have the same dimwitcrap president, the same dimwitcrap controlled senate and the same repugnantcan controlled house.

How the hell can you even believe that this election brought any change at all is beyond me.
 
Biden should know better than most what increases in corporate taxes do. Corps move to avoid them. They move to places like Delaware where they have favorable corporate taxes.

Smart move, if we want higher unemployment. :thup:
 
You're not going to get a budget deal that makes a meaningful reduction in the deficit unless the deal is a combination of spending cuts and tax increases.

The Romney/Ryan plan was to balance the budget on the backs of Democratic constituencies,

and let their own supporters, the GOP supporters, off the hook as much as possible. That was a stupid enough idea even if Romney was to win;

it's even crazier to think that's going to happen now that Romney lost.
 
No, what is clear is that the American people want a balanced approach to cutting the debt. one where everyone shares the load. From the wealthy with a *gasp* return to the Clinton tax rates, to the middle class, poor and elderly with cuts and revamping of programs....This has been Obama's platform all along.

He laid it out in the debates....showed a link to look at it in his campaign ads and told Americans to look at his proposals and to look at Romney's.....then make a decision......they did.

Wrong! The "give me for free" crowd showed up in larger numbers than those who actually care about their country.

LOL. And you are so stupid that you cannot see the contradiction within your own statement. If you truly cared about your nation, you show up and vote. And President Obama got over a 2 million majority. So guess who really cared about their nation?

Sad to see someone so blindly into stupid.
 
Wise words: act unAmerican, commit violent crimes, and die or go to jail.

There was no mandate for anything. There was a clear message that very close to half the country intends to do everything they can to continue to stop obama's policies. That is, everything they can legally do. Heaven help us if that half should give up on the legally part.
 
Welfare is wrong because it violates liberty in the sense that you have to take by force from people to have it. You basically are making slaves of people by giving partial ownership of the their labor to other people.
 
Yes! Those tax raises will bring in 800 billion over ten years. With 1.3 trillion in deficit spending, we should be moving towards a balanced budget by....never. So talking about tax increases while sliding in debt/deficit is a complete and utter joke.

It's like saying you're going to work one hour of over time each month at $20 hr to help pay off $100,000 in credit card debt.

You do realize that individuals take mortgages out for thirty or more years, right? That's on a single home....Hell, in some areas....people have to will their mortgages to their kids....

And?

I knew a girl from Stamford CT....her parents lived in Greenwich CT....the property in Greenwich is so high that a house that in my neck of the woods would cost $150k or so(with more land attached) cost over $1M. Her mom and dad where CPA's who worked in NYC....and they still had to will the mortgage to the kids in order for them to get it.

What are you blathering about?

The point? There's no way we are going to pay this down in a hurry. It's going to take time. The absolute worst thing we can do is cut to the bone, let the people rot and expect great things to happen. You want to see a bad economy? Just imagine if all those people(47% right?) on food stamps, Medicaid, and or housing subsidies.....most of whom are WORKING FULL TIME....get thrown under the bus. They don't have a pot to piss in now and you think destroying their lives is the way to prosperity? Same with SS and Medicare.....

OK, captain hyperbole. So what you're saying is that taxing the rich is simply retribution of the vengeance sort. Because it doesn't solve anything with so many on assisstance. Do you know what will happen to all of those people should the govt. default adn can not give them money? The same outcome, chump. Only worse. So hard choices have to be made or they will be FORCED anyway. Choices or forced, you LOLberals are in the driver seat and you're picking forced. Which is fuckigg retarded.

You want all of this to happen to the vast majority of this great country....but you refuse to let the people who have benefited the most, while raping this country in the form of outsourcing good paying jobs and replacing those jobs with bullshit ones that TEENAGERS used to do for spending money....who have seen their incomes rise some 600% over the past 30 years or so, while working people's have virtually stagnated over the same period of time.....see a jump of 4% in their income taxes....to help out in addition to the cuts being proposed.

What cuts being proposed?

You know what? I'd love for the private sector to handle this.....I'd love to believe that trickle down works....but that outsourcing wasn't about taxes and regulation....it was about dirt cheap labor and the loophole that says...."until you bring the money back to the US, you don't have to pay taxes on it."

Trickle down was a scam to bust labor unions and turn America over to the Conglomerate....look where it's gotten us.

All I see here is a bunch of obfuscation, appeal to emotion, hyperbole and nonsense. Should I even be fucking surprised at this point?
 
you better get you some blood from a stone you stupid penis head, cause there isn't enough money in the rich man's pocket to fund socialism.

And another talking point....why am I not surprised? I'll tell you what....we'll start by stripping you of your Social Security checks and your Medicare card....don't worry...you can be a greeter at Walmart and we'll give you a voucher to help pay for YOUR medical coverage.





As long as my situation is the law of the land you are unable to pick on me personally. So work a little harder today. Or do you work at all? You're always online. so I don't think you do much work at all.
I'm always online? I work from 6am-2:30pm. I get every third weekend off. The rest of my breakdays fall during the week.

I've never taken a dime of Government money that I didn't earn by working my ass off taking care of people your kind hates because they aren't and never will be productive....the developmentally disabled.

Just to set your mind at ease....I have the next six days off, as I am on vacation....I go in on WED, because that was the one day there wasn't enough on the schedule to allow off....then I am off four more days until the following Monday.

We put in for our time off....granted on a seniority basis.....in two "selection periods".....one in March that covers July-December....and one in October, which covers January-June.

I am pretty high on earned time off because I've committed 23 years of my life to the place....but I'm stuck in the middle of the seniority list because from 2000-2003, I had a break in service....I had just gotten married to my second(and current) wife who is an RN at the same facility where I work. I am a direct care staff and only had a HS diploma....There were serious talk of closing our place of employment and privatizing. Being newly married and undereducated...I was concerned about what I would do if this happened. I took IT certification classes at our closest Community College and after I got certified, I threw my resume out....I got a job that paid about $4/hr less than what I was making, but figured I'd catch up pretty quickly.

Other than the drive (about 2 hours one way), I loved it....and was good at it...I was promoted to Senior Technician and ran the show when the manager was off....but after two years, the drive wore on me. I saw in our local paper that the School district that I graduated from was looking for a Tech....I interviewed, was offered the job, and gave my two weeks notice at the company I was working for. Big fucking mistake.....The Network Admin didn't know her ass from a hole in the ground, She was tyrannical, and get this one.....and all you IT people out there will know what I am talking about.....she had me stringing CAT 5 cable up in classrooms that had one jack at the doorway to desks with......adhesive hooks designed for Christmas lights!

after a year of this nonsense....I couldn't take it anymore...I used to wake up and damn near bawl that I had to go into that hell hole. I didn't want to do the drive anymore either...so I sat down with my wife and discussed options....we agreed that going back to the facility was the most logical route....so I applied for reinstatement and they were glad to have me back. I found that once I was back....I really.missed working with those people and that's where my calling truly is.....I'm good at IT.....but I excel with working with the Developmentally Disabled.

The people that I work with have extreme psychiatric issues on top of their DD....it gets quite hairy on a regular basis...but my co-workers and I are very adept at defusing volatile situations. On the plus side, the people I work with are very capable physically and can do normal tasks like dressing themselves etc....so I'm not wiping butts anymore(did it for a long time though)....but these guys are very stressful to work with and no matter what happens, you can't retaliate or you will be fired for abuse(rightfully so). You have to have thick skin, be able to take a punch, and count to ten when someone spits in your face(believe it or not....that's the one I have the most trouble with)....Oh yeah.....they are also smart enough to know the abuse.policy and will report you for it, as they are also verbal. Yep....lots of false accusations that arise from say....an overweight person who wants a handful of cookies after he ate his Medically restricted lunch.....so, you have to say no....then the outburst comes, followed by grabbing pads to block the punches and kicks(we aren't allowed to restrain...just block) until they wear themselves out....then they report one of us....and we get taken to dietary to prepare meals until the investigation is completed.

Not complaining about my job....just giving you some insight as to what I do....and why you see me on here at hours when most people should be working....trust me....I've never been lazy and I've never taken a hnadout.
 
Last edited:
Raise taxes and cut spending. Now.

No.

Only when they've drastically cut spending can they then raise taxes. On everyone.

That's how it works, Democrats won the election taking both the presidency and the senate. We're doing things their way. You don't like that agenda, write your congressmen.


Sarah's idea of compromise: We won, fuck you Republicans, it's our way or the highway.

You believe that if they raise taxes they (government, both sides) will really and truly cut spending, enough to actually make a dent, don't you?

:lol: Leftists sure are a funny lot.
 
No, what is clear is that the American people want a balanced approach to cutting the debt. one where everyone shares the load. From the wealthy with a *gasp* return to the Clinton tax rates, to the middle class, poor and elderly with cuts and revamping of programs....This has been Obama's platform all along.

He laid it out in the debates....showed a link to look at it in his campaign ads and told Americans to look at his proposals and to look at Romney's.....then make a decision......they did.


Fair isn't singling out the rich to pay more, fair is everyone kicking in more. Let Obama's tax cuts expire, for everyone.

No..fair is everyone paying the same percentage of their income.


Tell that to Baa-rock, he seems to think the 'rich' don't pay their fair share.
 
No.

Only when they've drastically cut spending can they then raise taxes. On everyone.

That's how it works, Democrats won the election taking both the presidency and the senate. We're doing things their way. You don't like that agenda, write your congressmen.


Sarah's idea of compromise: We won, fuck you Republicans, it's our way or the highway.

You believe that if they raise taxes they (government, both sides) will really and truly cut spending, enough to actually make a dent, don't you?

:lol: Leftists sure are a funny lot.[/QUOTE]


They get giddy on the methane! :eusa_pray:
 
No, what is clear is that the American people want a balanced approach to cutting the debt. one where everyone shares the load. From the wealthy with a *gasp* return to the Clinton tax rates, to the middle class, poor and elderly with cuts and revamping of programs....This has been Obama's platform all along.

He laid it out in the debates....showed a link to look at it in his campaign ads and told Americans to look at his proposals and to look at Romney's.....then make a decision......they did.


Fair isn't singling out the rich to pay more, fair is everyone kicking in more. Let Obama's tax cuts expire, for everyone.

So....what you are saying is that you want cuts to entitlements(hits the poor, elderly, working and middle class), Obama's cuts to expire(hits the poor, working and middle class).....and then you will be OK with the rich paying 4% more?

Sounds like a great deal.....for the rich.


Obama wants everyone to pay their fair share. Having the rich pay 4% more while having no one else pay 4% more isn't fair. Everyone pays the same percentage more, that's fair.

Entitlements are going to have to be cut, all of them. Yes we will be in a world of suck. Our government (BOTH sides) have screwed up and the sooner we pay the piper the sooner we recover.

Or we can just kick the can down the road some more till we implode.

True cutts first, fair taxation to follow.
 
A president's second term, even a presidebt's second term is all about the legacy. Since obama won, the battle is now to deprive him of that legacy, which means we go over the fiscal cliff.
 
You dumb twat....you don't think the cuts are going to affect people in the same way....(fuck, it'll hit them harder)....as tax increases?

You aren't going to get blood from a stone.

you better get you some blood from a stone you stupid penis head, cause there isn't enough money in the rich man's pocket to fund socialism.

And another talking point....why am I not surprised? I'll tell you what....we'll start by stripping you of your Social Security checks and your Medicare card....don't worry...you can be a greeter at Walmart and we'll give you a voucher to help pay for YOUR medical coverage.


She paid into SS and Medicare for a lifetime ... and you want to take that from her?

Voucher? Haven't you heard? ACA is here to stay, it will cover everyone, it will cover everything, low costs to all.

Giddyup!
 
whoohoo, tax tax tax..TAX AWAY

SNIP:

8:41 PM, Nov 7, 2012 • By DANIEL HALPER

Vice President Joe Biden told reporters on Air Force Two today that last night's election represented a clear "mandate" to raise taxes.

"Where specifically do you think Republicans will be willing to compromise on issues of debt/deficit?" a pool reported asked Biden.

"Well look, I think -- You guys have probably looked at the internals of the vote more than I have so far," said Biden. "But from what it appears is that, on the issue of the tax issue, there was a clear, a clear sort of mandate about people coming much closer to our view about how to deal with tax policy. I think we can move, I'd like to see us, I think we can do something on corporate taxes sooner than later. That would be positive, be a little confidence-building. And you know I just think it's going to take time for the Republicans to sort of digest what the consequences for them internally. But i just think there's too much, I've been saying to you all along and I know I may be the only guy - well, I think Clinton shares this view, President Clinton, we talked about it. But I think the fever will break. And you know, Barack's re-elected so this sort of cause to keep a second term from happening's done. He's there for four years. So I think there's going to be - I hope there's going to be some real soul-searching about, on Republican Party, about what they're willing to cooperate on."

all of it here
Biden: Clear 'Mandate' to Raise Taxes | The Weekly Standard


Clearly Biden does not know how our Government works. They are powerless to raise taxes with out the House. So if the people had been giving the Dems a Mandate to raise taxes, don't ya think they would have at least gained a few seats in the house?

lol
 
Fair isn't singling out the rich to pay more, fair is everyone kicking in more. Let Obama's tax cuts expire, for everyone.

So....what you are saying is that you want cuts to entitlements(hits the poor, elderly, working and middle class), Obama's cuts to expire(hits the poor, working and middle class).....and then you will be OK with the rich paying 4% more?

Sounds like a great deal.....for the rich.


Obama wants everyone to pay their fair share. Having the rich pay 4% more while having no one else pay 4% more isn't fair. Everyone pays the same percentage more, that's fair.

Entitlements are going to have to be cut, all of them. Yes we will be in a world of suck. Our government (BOTH sides) have screwed up and the sooner we pay the piper the sooner we recover.

Or we can just kick the can down the road some more till we implode.

True cutts first, fair taxation to follow.

Cuts are the the way the poor and elderly pay....what you want is for the cuts to take place AND force them to pay more in taxation....whereas the rich only get hit once. That's not fair, as you say....it's highly unfair, and skewed....ONCE AGAIN.....in favor of our most powerful.
 
We do not have the same economy we had when Clinton was in office. The mistake is in believing that somehow raising taxes will create the kind of economy that Clinton had. That's a disastrous mistake. Raising taxes does not create a vibrant economy. Government spending does not create a vibrant economy or Japan would not have had its own disastrous ten years.

No, the mistake is thinking that putting the load of debt reduction solely on the shoulders of the people who are already struggling will fix the economy, while leaving the Conglomerate and it's masters.....who show little to no loyalty to their own country if it doesn't serve them and them alone....free to continue their ways.

BTW, I noticed you only focused on the taxation part of my post and ignored the rest. There will be cuts....there will be revamping of programs....you know it as well as I.

I'm curious, Steel...what cuts to programs for the elderly and the poor was it that Barack Obama supported? I think I missed that. Obama has proposed raising taxes on those making over $250,000 a year and he's given some vague assurances that he'll look at entitlement reform...somewhere down the line...but he's also given assurances that he won't cut anyone's entitlements. He's been in office for four years...can you give me some examples of entitlements that he HAS cut?
 
You dumb twat....you don't think the cuts are going to affect people in the same way....(fuck, it'll hit them harder)....as tax increases?

You aren't going to get blood from a stone.

you better get you some blood from a stone you stupid penis head, cause there isn't enough money in the rich man's pocket to fund socialism.

And another talking point....why am I not surprised? I'll tell you what....we'll start by stripping you of your Social Security checks and your Medicare card....don't worry...you can be a greeter at Walmart and we'll give you a voucher to help pay for YOUR medical coverage.
What the ever living fuck is wrong with you? SHE paid HER money into SS.

The fact that the government can't manage that simple idea is amazing. And, the fact that YOU - or many on the left - want to take HER money that she, by law, was forced to divert into the "trusting hands" of the government is stunning.
 

Forum List

Back
Top