Beto just put his pedicured foot in his mouth. Then shoots it with an AR15.

Beto thinks we don't need to be selling anymore weapons of war to the public but couldn't any gun be considered a weapon of war? In that case isn't he calling for a gun ban?

Of course it does. Take away the peoples ability to protect themselves from the Govt, and Complete control over the Populace by force is conceivable. Without the 2nd Amendment, we would be forced to throw rocks. You know like in Venezuela! Govt has weapons, People don't = Socialism/ Communism. Dictatorships.
 
The Hill
@thehill

Beto O'Rourke: "If you own an AR-15, keep it. Continue to use it responsibly and safely. I just don't think that we need to sell anymore weapons of war into this public." (link: The Hill on Twitter) pic.twitter.com/uqMA1jWOTf
Is it possible this idiot thinks an AR15 a weapon of war?

And then says they need to be banned, but says it's ok to keep them if you have them?

Hahahaha.

Beto may just be as stupid as AOC...

Or perhaps he's just pretending to be stupid in order to win the Democrat nomination.

Remington thinks they are weapons of war. Oh look. Advertisements saying just that.

acr_185e205a-71.jpg


Screen-Shot-2019-03-14-at-4.47.56-PM.png


Damn you stupid.

Oh, and for a bonus, here's a picture of a Trump supporter wearing a vagina hat.

gavin-410x220.jpg


Happy t. Patricks Day asshole.

That's not an AR-15. It's a Bushmaster ACR. The Bushmaster ACR a renamed version of the Remington ACR. It's a military grade selective fire weapon only available to the US military and law enforcement agencies. Several years ago Remington subcontracted manufacturing to Bushmaster, at which point the name of the weapon was changed. Bushmaster also licensed permission to manufacture a civilian grade semiautomatic variant.

You morons really need to educate yourselves before you open your mouths.
 
so semi-auto is used in war/for war

So are handguns. So are horses for crying out loud. Should we ban horses as assault weapons? You can take my horse reins from my cold, dead hands.
very silly
..I have not heard one even decent argument from the prog-gunners
..I don't think I saw horses on the murder weapons lists--but guns I do see as the majority

....plain and simple---you say the AR 15 is not military grade/etc--but it does the SAME thing as the M16
..you must not have read my other posts---go back and read them
...we hardly ever used full auto or 3 round burst when I was in
it was mostly semi auto --EXACTLY like the AR 15
..even on 2 tap quick fire for close range training, it was semi-auto
 
very silly

Why, because you can't refute anything I've said with facts and reason?

I have not heard one even decent argument from the prog-gunners

I don't even know what that's supposed to mean.

I don't think I saw horses on the murder weapons lists--but guns I do see as the majority

Now you're moving goal posts. Did you not use the "used in war" standard? Did you say that, or not? You will be held accountable for the statements you make and the explanations you attempt to leverage toward your conclusions. They will be used against you. Which is exactly what has happened here. You made an argument that fails because an equivalent argument produces results you reject.

plain and simple---you say the AR 15 is not military grade/etc--but it does the SAME thing as the M16

False, but you don't really care about facts, do you?

we hardly ever used full auto or 3 round burst when I was in
it was mostly semi auto --EXACTLY like the AR 15
..even on 2 tap quick fire for close range training, it was semi-auto

That is correct. Nineteenth century technology continues to be the most effective and safest way to use a personal firearm. That does not justify you trying to distort the facts to twist them into lies in hopes of preying on ignorance.

Like I said, semiautomatic handguns are also used by the military "in war/for war." Horses are used in war in more or less the same kinds of way that they can be used for civilian purposes. Hell, food is used in war to nourish troops. The fact that something is used "in war/for war" is an absurd standard to use because nearly everything under the sun falls into that category.
 
The Hill
@thehill

Beto O'Rourke: "If you own an AR-15, keep it. Continue to use it responsibly and safely. I just don't think that we need to sell anymore weapons of war into this public." (link: The Hill on Twitter) pic.twitter.com/uqMA1jWOTf
Is it possible this idiot thinks an AR15 a weapon of war?

And then says they need to be banned, but says it's ok to keep them if you have them?

Hahahaha.

Beto may just be as stupid as AOC...

Or perhaps he's just pretending to be stupid in order to win the Democrat nomination.
no one has ever told me what war/country uses ar15s.
 
very silly

Why, because you can't refute anything I've said with facts and reason?

I have not heard one even decent argument from the prog-gunners

I don't even know what that's supposed to mean.

I don't think I saw horses on the murder weapons lists--but guns I do see as the majority

Now you're moving goal posts. Did you not use the "used in war" standard? Did you say that, or not? You will be held accountable for the statements you make and the explanations you attempt to leverage toward your conclusions. They will be used against you. Which is exactly what has happened here. You made an argument that fails because an equivalent argument produces results you reject.

plain and simple---you say the AR 15 is not military grade/etc--but it does the SAME thing as the M16

False, but you don't really care about facts, do you?

we hardly ever used full auto or 3 round burst when I was in
it was mostly semi auto --EXACTLY like the AR 15
..even on 2 tap quick fire for close range training, it was semi-auto

That is correct. Nineteenth century technology continues to be the most effective and safest way to use a personal firearm. That does not justify you trying to distort the facts to twist them into lies in hopes of preying on ignorance.

Like I said, semiautomatic handguns are also used by the military "in war/for war." Horses are used in war in more or less the same kinds of way that they can be used for civilian purposes. Hell, food is used in war to nourish troops. The fact that something is used "in war/for war" is an absurd standard to use because nearly everything under the sun falls into that category.
...you did not read/understand ALL the posts...please go back through the thread so you can understand
from the OP:
s it possible this idiot thinks an AR15 a weapon of war?
....I made the point with numerous facts that the AR 15 fires EXACTLY the same as the M16s ---a weapon of war
 
very silly

Why, because you can't refute anything I've said with facts and reason?

I have not heard one even decent argument from the prog-gunners

I don't even know what that's supposed to mean.

I don't think I saw horses on the murder weapons lists--but guns I do see as the majority

Now you're moving goal posts. Did you not use the "used in war" standard? Did you say that, or not? You will be held accountable for the statements you make and the explanations you attempt to leverage toward your conclusions. They will be used against you. Which is exactly what has happened here. You made an argument that fails because an equivalent argument produces results you reject.

plain and simple---you say the AR 15 is not military grade/etc--but it does the SAME thing as the M16

False, but you don't really care about facts, do you?

we hardly ever used full auto or 3 round burst when I was in
it was mostly semi auto --EXACTLY like the AR 15
..even on 2 tap quick fire for close range training, it was semi-auto

That is correct. Nineteenth century technology continues to be the most effective and safest way to use a personal firearm. That does not justify you trying to distort the facts to twist them into lies in hopes of preying on ignorance.

Like I said, semiautomatic handguns are also used by the military "in war/for war." Horses are used in war in more or less the same kinds of way that they can be used for civilian purposes. Hell, food is used in war to nourish troops. The fact that something is used "in war/for war" is an absurd standard to use because nearly everything under the sun falls into that category.
beyond silly
horses generally used for transport/etc
handguns/rifles used to KILL
AND horses not used much in war anymore
beyond silly
just as silly as comparing cars to guns
 
The Hill
@thehill

Beto O'Rourke: "If you own an AR-15, keep it. Continue to use it responsibly and safely. I just don't think that we need to sell anymore weapons of war into this public." (link: The Hill on Twitter) pic.twitter.com/uqMA1jWOTf
Is it possible this idiot thinks an AR15 a weapon of war?

And then says they need to be banned, but says it's ok to keep them if you have them?

Hahahaha.

Beto may just be as stupid as AOC...

Or perhaps he's just pretending to be stupid in order to win the Democrat nomination.

Beto Asshole is confused.

I have 29 AR-15s. I use them almost every week. Been doing that for decades. Never used them for war.
 
Let me run this by you knuckleheads one last time.......

I am a Combat Veteran. Got the CIB to prove it. I've seen what guns do to people and it ain't pretty. And, unlike what you see in the Disgusting FILTH of the Media (of which hollywood is part and parcel( people don't just fall down, close their eyes and go to sleep when they've been shot. They make a lot of noise. A lot sickening noise.

Point being, YES, I agree that there are way too many guns in the hands of people who really shouldn't own them.

An AR15 type of rifle is a killing machine. The damage that round does to people is horrendous. Very, very nasty. Especially if it's got a MilGrade load.

Most people that have them neither need them nor should they have them. They aren't trained enough.

That aside, dimocrap scum have to take the blame for all the Semi Auto weapons in the hands of these numbskulls.

Bill The Rapist Clinton, to be specific.

Before The Rapist, few people had an AR (which stands for Armalite, BTW not Assault Rifle). They just weren't interested in them. A few gun enthusiasts had them and that was about it.

Then, The Rapist along with his IDIOT Sheep in the media made a big fuss over -- Something. Anything.

After The Rapist's IDIOTIC laws expired (Sunset Provision) people went nuts buying them. Absolutely nuts.

There aren't just a few hundred thousand too many of them in the hands of people who really shouldn't own them, not even just a few million......

I'm talking TENS OF MILLIONS.

Know whjy?

Because, aside from being the scum of the Earth, dimocraps are also stupid. Beyond stupid. I'm talking mouth-breathing, can barely walk and chew gum at the same time stupid.

And it didn't end with The Rapist, The Lying Cocksucker In Chief made gun control a big part of his platform.

So you know what people do when you tell them that something may not be available to them in the near future??

The run out and buy one. Or two. Or ten.

Many of them were bought as an investment.

Tens of Millions in the hands of people who really have no business owning them.

And now you want to make the problem worse......

If dimocrap scum weren't so fucking stupid, they'd be funny. Instead, they're just pathetic.

Come and take 100,000,000 AR Rifles from people. Let me know how you make out.

dimocraps are scum
 
Let me run this by you knuckleheads one last time.......

I am a Combat Veteran. Got the CIB to prove it. I've seen what guns do to people and it ain't pretty. And, unlike what you see in the Disgusting FILTH of the Media (of which hollywood is part and parcel( people don't just fall down, close their eyes and go to sleep when they've been shot. They make a lot of noise. A lot sickening noise.

Point being, YES, I agree that there are way too many guns in the hands of people who really shouldn't own them.

An AR15 type of rifle is a killing machine. The damage that round does to people is horrendous. Very, very nasty. Especially if it's got a MilGrade load.

Most people that have them neither need them nor should they have them. They aren't trained enough.

I don't need your permission to own an AR and I don't give a shit if you think I shouldn't have one or not. It is none of your business.

I am also a combat veteran and I am also a firearms trainer and range officer. I am around a lot of shooters and take gun safety very serious.

Very few ARs are ever used for killing. In fact given the tens of millions that are the hands of Americans only a minuscule amount are ever used for crime. The 99.9% are used for security and recreational purposes.

The last we need to have idiots take away our Constitutional rights because they don't think we should deserve to have them.
 
Beto thinks we don't need to be selling anymore weapons of war to the public but couldn't any gun be considered a weapon of war? In that case isn't he calling for a gun ban?


The pump action shotguns is an actual weapon of war, used by he military right now. The Bolt action rifle is a weapon of war, used by the military right now. The AR-15 is not used by the military.....

Also, the lever action rifle was a weapon of war, as was the 6 shot revolver.
 
Beto thinks we don't need to be selling anymore weapons of war to the public but couldn't any gun be considered a weapon of war? In that case isn't he calling for a gun ban?


The pump action shotguns is an actual weapon of war, used by he military right now. The Bolt action rifle is a weapon of war, used by the military right now. The AR-15 is not used by the military.....

Also, the lever action rifle was a weapon of war, as was the 6 shot revolver.
The M9 Beretta is the current sidearm of the U.S. Military guess that makes any pistol a weapon of war as well.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top