Bernie refuses to be dragged into the mud by liberal media.

You can respect the man while not supporting his policy. I'm old so my comparison may not be known to you. He reminds me a bit of Hubert Humphrey.

My sentiments exactly. Point-for-point, I'm probably opposed most of his proposals. But that's still more than the other asshats running.
 
That's probably true, but we both know, in the end, the party bosses will get their way, even if they have to rig the process. Most grass roots observers are pretty sure they rigged the process last time with Romney. None of the "people" liked who they picked. The press made their minds up for them. The folks that read about the candidates, understood their positions, and weren't influenced by the media. . . like, say, the soldiers over seas? You do know who they overwhelmingly broke for? And you do know whose delegates weren't even seated at the convention?

So yeah, in the end, the party bosses decide everything. We might as well get used to the idea of a Bush/Clinton run off now. And a Bush victory already. lol
Are you forgetting that Trump is funding his own campaign? The status quo is null and void this time.

Trump is not funding it alone anymore, he is taking on donors--- said it a couple weeks back & there's a big DONATE button, plain as day on his campaign website.
It's one thing to take small donations from individuals, another to take large donations from big corporations who expect special favors in return. Trump isn't out doing $5,000 a plate fund raisers from fat cats the way the establishment candidates do.

lol, In other words, I want an ignorant tool that plays to the base, like Failin Palin, the Trumpster, Loser Libertarian Paul, etc
Dude, you make so sense. Put the bottle down.

Sure Bubba, it's me supporting losers who don't know how to Govern much less how to do more than tickle the low info, bigoted losers supporting the GOP
 
Yeah, Humphrey didn't know how whacked out liberals were either.
Remember the last time a riot broke out during their convention.
Chicago 68. The brawl got so bad the police had to be called. Have NO doubt their sh8t stinks. BLM will be AT that convention. The Black Panthers were in Chicago.

Democrats can laugh all they want but they got problems. Tons of problems from ALL directions. IF they choose Sanders they will be socialist democrats BECAUSE that is what HE is. So the moniker is theirs.

The wonks don't want him but the people do. Same issue Trump faces. The wonks want Bush like their wonks want Hillary. Bush AND Hillary need to take the bus home.

It's over for both of them and the wonks just need to start dealing with.

That's probably true, but we both know, in the end, the party bosses will get their way, even if they have to rig the process. Most grass roots observers are pretty sure they rigged the process last time with Romney. None of the "people" liked who they picked. The press made their minds up for them. The folks that read about the candidates, understood their positions, and weren't influenced by the media. . . like, say, the soldiers over seas? You do know who they overwhelmingly broke for? And you do know whose delegates weren't even seated at the convention?

So yeah, in the end, the party bosses decide everything. We might as well get used to the idea of a Bush/Clinton run off now. And a Bush victory already. lol
Are you forgetting that Trump is funding his own campaign? The status quo is null and void this time.

Trump is not funding it alone anymore, he is taking on donors--- said it a couple weeks back & there's a big DONATE button, plain as day on his campaign website.
It's one thing to take small donations from individuals, another to take large donations from big corporations who expect special favors in return. Trump isn't out doing $5,000 a plate fund raisers from fat cats the way the establishment candidates do.

Trump doesn't have to take in donations, whether it's by the little guy or by 'big 'corp' because he doesn't need either... period.

Bernie is getting donations by working class people, & i'll bet by some who really can't afford to give at all- but they are.

He's NOT taking big corp $$$ by choice, even though he certainly can use it...
 
If the Dems had the balls to nominate Bernie, I'd vote for him*.

I'd probably fight him tooth and nail on most of his policy initiatives, but it'd be a fight worth having, and not a shitshow like we're guaranteed with the other bozos running.

*though I'm under no delusions here - the don't.
 
If the Dems had the balls to nominate Bernie, I'd vote for him*.

I'd probably fight him tooth and nail on most of his policy initiatives, but it'd be a fight worth having, and not a shitshow like we're guaranteed with the other bozos running.

*though I'm under no delusions here - the don't.

They absolutely don't. Nobody ever accused the DP of having cojones. That would be like McDonald's endorsing gluten-free organic vegeburgers with sprouts. Can't let principles get in the way of profit.

What Sanders provides that is the most constructive is those awkward silences that follow the issues he brings up. To the extent the message is heard it plants productive seeds.
 
YAWN

Bernie's too busy demagogueing about and demonizing the rich

HE'S STILL IN THE MUD, just not the mud-pile MSNBC wants him in
 
Progressives are so proud of their farthest Left-wing politician, the one with the 98% voting with Democrats record!! ;)
 

Forum List

Back
Top