Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer

[Buck111]

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.


Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer

People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.

According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.

Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

 

[Care4all]

Chemo killed my father in law, off pretty quickly.... I don't know how long he would have lived without it, but my guess is at least a few years longer and in far less pain....he was 6'4'' and weighed about 210 pounds when he began the chemo and 98lbs when he was done, and died a few weeks later....it's a horrible death.

 

[FA_Q2]

Bullshit claim. Having been through that with my son and the dozens of other kids that went through it around him I can say that such a claim is utter bullshit.

 

[Dale Smith]

Bullshit claim. Having been through that with my son and the dozens of other kids that went through it around him I can say that such a claim is utter bullshit.

The cure for cancer using vibration/frequency therapy has been around for decades and kept under wraps by the Rockefeller family that started the American Cancer Society. Cancer is a man-made disease and part of the eugenicist plan of the elites. Chemo is expensive and it kills healthy cells as well and can make fast acting cancers accelerate. It's all documented if you wish to research it. Our bodies work on frequencies and the right frequencies can kill cancer cells while leaving healthy cells alone. When was the last time you ever heard of a globalist elitist ever die of cancer?????

 

[theDoctorisIn]

That "Berkeley doctor" who your article quotes died 40 years ago, and published the work quoted by the article in the 50s.

It's fairly safe to say that his conclusions are somewhat out of date.

Speaking as someone who's seen various family members go through chemo and live, and die of cancer without it.

 

[American_Jihad]

Take it with a grain of salt---> "berkeley" doctor...

 

[william the wie]

It all depends on type and stage of cancer. But when excision is not an option take a time out and review all of the options and that conforms to what I hear from most but not all doctors. Or as double blind studies repeatedly show if placeboes could be patented they would be the greatest wonder drug ever seen.

 

[Buck111]

It has been brought to my attention the link in the opening post may contain some serious errors. I do not like posting fabrications and normally evaluate my posts thoroughly before creating threads. HOWEVER, I feel this article (right or wrong) gives us all a chance to discuss the pros and cons of chemotherapy and radiation. If you have success stories concerning these treatments, please post and let us know WHY you think the treatments are the cause of the successes; If you have negatives, please post WHY you see chemotherapy and radiation treatments as negatives.

 

[dfens]

The cure for cancer is to pray to Jesus and vote for Republicans.

Do that, and you will become a billionaire and live forever. At least, that's what the white guys believe.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.


Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer

People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.

According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.

Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

But what does this mean?

Potentially the people who refuse the treatment have less severe cancer than those who accept it. In which case those who accept it might die earlier anyway.

 

[william the wie]

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.


Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.


[URL='http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/']Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer

People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.

According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.

Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

But what does this mean?

Potentially the people who refuse the treatment have less severe cancer than those who accept it. In which case those who accept it might die earlier anyway.

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.


Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer

People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.

According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.

Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

But what does this mean?

Potentially the people who refuse the treatment have less severe cancer than those who accept it. In which case those who accept it might die earlier anyway.

[/URL]

People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.

According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.

Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

But what does this mean?

Potentially the people who refuse the treatment have less severe cancer than those who accept it. In which case those who accept it might die earlier anyway.

Also many effective treatments are not technically considered chemotherapy. Some treatments are enzymatic triggers to prevent the formation of more blood vessels also nanotech targeting makes radiation or chemo much less dangerous.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.


Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.

http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer
http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.
http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.
http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
But what does this mean?
http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
Potentially the people who refuse the treatment have less severe cancer than those who accept it. In which case those who accept it might die earlier anyway.

http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.

http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer
http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.
http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.
http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
But what does this mean?
http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/
Potentially the people who refuse the treatment have less severe cancer than those who accept it. In which case those who accept it might die earlier anyway.

http://realfarmacy.com/chemotherapy-not-cancer/

People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.

According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.

Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

But what does this mean?

Potentially the people who refuse the treatment have less severe cancer than those who accept it. In which case those who accept it might die earlier anyway.

Also many effective treatments are not technically considered chemotherapy. Some treatments are enzymatic triggers to prevent the formation of more blood vessels also nanotech targeting makes radiation or chemo much less dangerous.

Well my father had cancer, he didn't have Chemo, and he survived. Maybe they caught it earlier, I'm not exactly sure what was going on, but possibly he could be one of those who "rejected chemotherapy", but didn't need it.

 

[FA_Q2]

It has been brought to my attention the link in the opening post may contain some serious errors. I do not like posting fabrications and normally evaluate my posts thoroughly before creating threads. HOWEVER, I feel this article (right or wrong) gives us all a chance to discuss the pros and cons of chemotherapy and radiation. If you have success stories concerning these treatments, please post and let us know WHY you think the treatments are the cause of the successes; If you have negatives, please post WHY you see chemotherapy and radiation treatments as negatives.

The positives are quite obvious - the vast majority of people with forms of cancer that can be treated with chemotherapy will die.

Most who are treated do not or at least have significantly higher survival rates. Chemo is brutal and very sad but saves lives. The treatments have been thoroughly tested over decades and newer treatments are coming out every year.

 

[FA_Q2]

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.


Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.

Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer
People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.
According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.
Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

But what does this mean?
Potentially the people who refuse the treatment have less severe cancer than those who accept it. In which case those who accept it might die earlier anyway.

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.

Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer
People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.
According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.
Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

But what does this mean?
Potentially the people who refuse the treatment have less severe cancer than those who accept it. In which case those who accept it might die earlier anyway.

People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.

According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.

Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

But what does this mean?

Potentially the people who refuse the treatment have less severe cancer than those who accept it. In which case those who accept it might die earlier anyway.

Also many effective treatments are not technically considered chemotherapy. Some treatments are enzymatic triggers to prevent the formation of more blood vessels also nanotech targeting makes radiation or chemo much less dangerous.

Well my father had cancer, he didn't have Chemo, and he survived. Maybe they caught it earlier, I'm not exactly sure what was going on, but possibly he could be one of those who "rejected chemotherapy", but didn't need it.

Possibly. I would think it was more likely that his particular case was not a good candidate for chemo therapy. Not all cases are good candidates for it particularly with how damaging chemo is to the patient.

 

[Buck111]

It has been brought to my attention the link in the opening post may contain some serious errors. I do not like posting fabrications and normally evaluate my posts thoroughly before creating threads. HOWEVER, I feel this article (right or wrong) gives us all a chance to discuss the pros and cons of chemotherapy and radiation. If you have success stories concerning these treatments, please post and let us know WHY you think the treatments are the cause of the successes; If you have negatives, please post WHY you see chemotherapy and radiation treatments as negatives.

The positives are quite obvious - the vast majority of people with forms of cancer that can be treated with chemotherapy will die.

Moest who are treated do not or at least have significantly higher survival rates. Chemo is brutal and very sad but saves lives. The treatments have been thoroughly tested over decades and newer treatments are coming out every year.

Chemo and radiations are "treatments". Treatments are not meant to cure, nor do they.

 

[FA_Q2]

It has been brought to my attention the link in the opening post may contain some serious errors. I do not like posting fabrications and normally evaluate my posts thoroughly before creating threads. HOWEVER, I feel this article (right or wrong) gives us all a chance to discuss the pros and cons of chemotherapy and radiation. If you have success stories concerning these treatments, please post and let us know WHY you think the treatments are the cause of the successes; If you have negatives, please post WHY you see chemotherapy and radiation treatments as negatives.

The positives are quite obvious - the vast majority of people with forms of cancer that can be treated with chemotherapy will die.

Moest who are treated do not or at least have significantly higher survival rates. Chemo is brutal and very sad but saves lives. The treatments have been thoroughly tested over decades and newer treatments are coming out every year.

Chemo and radiations are "treatments". Treatments are not meant to cure, nor do they.

Yes they are and yes they do.

I have no idea what you seem to think treatments are supposed to do then.

 

[Buck111]

It has been brought to my attention the link in the opening post may contain some serious errors. I do not like posting fabrications and normally evaluate my posts thoroughly before creating threads. HOWEVER, I feel this article (right or wrong) gives us all a chance to discuss the pros and cons of chemotherapy and radiation. If you have success stories concerning these treatments, please post and let us know WHY you think the treatments are the cause of the successes; If you have negatives, please post WHY you see chemotherapy and radiation treatments as negatives.

The positives are quite obvious - the vast majority of people with forms of cancer that can be treated with chemotherapy will die.

Moest who are treated do not or at least have significantly higher survival rates. Chemo is brutal and very sad but saves lives. The treatments have been thoroughly tested over decades and newer treatments are coming out every year.

Chemo and radiations are "treatments". Treatments are not meant to cure, nor do they.

Yes they are and yes they do.

I have no idea what you seem to think treatments are supposed to do then.

Doctors treat cancer with the hope it will go into full remission. They cannot expect anything more than that. Have you ever heard of a doctor say, "Hey, we're going to cure your cancer with chemo/radiation."? No, you haven't. They say they will "treat" the patient with chemo and/or radiation.

Here, read this:
"Cure" vs. remission: The wording makes the difference | Scrubbing In

 

[FA_Q2]

It has been brought to my attention the link in the opening post may contain some serious errors. I do not like posting fabrications and normally evaluate my posts thoroughly before creating threads. HOWEVER, I feel this article (right or wrong) gives us all a chance to discuss the pros and cons of chemotherapy and radiation. If you have success stories concerning these treatments, please post and let us know WHY you think the treatments are the cause of the successes; If you have negatives, please post WHY you see chemotherapy and radiation treatments as negatives.

The positives are quite obvious - the vast majority of people with forms of cancer that can be treated with chemotherapy will die.

Moest who are treated do not or at least have significantly higher survival rates. Chemo is brutal and very sad but saves lives. The treatments have been thoroughly tested over decades and newer treatments are coming out every year.

Chemo and radiations are "treatments". Treatments are not meant to cure, nor do they.

Yes they are and yes they do.

I have no idea what you seem to think treatments are supposed to do then.

Doctors treat cancer with the hope it will go into full remission. They cannot expect anything more than that. Have you ever heard of a doctor say, "Hey, we're going to cure your cancer with chemo/radiation."? No, you haven't. They say they will "treat" the patient with chemo and/or radiation.

Here, read this:
"Cure" vs. remission: The wording makes the difference | Scrubbing In

Yes it can come back. That really does not change anything.

You are splitting hairs here. They cannot fully tell if the cancer is totally cured or not but it certainly does cure many patients. All will continue monitoring in case it does come back from some cells missed.

 

[Buck111]

It has been brought to my attention the link in the opening post may contain some serious errors. I do not like posting fabrications and normally evaluate my posts thoroughly before creating threads. HOWEVER, I feel this article (right or wrong) gives us all a chance to discuss the pros and cons of chemotherapy and radiation. If you have success stories concerning these treatments, please post and let us know WHY you think the treatments are the cause of the successes; If you have negatives, please post WHY you see chemotherapy and radiation treatments as negatives.

The positives are quite obvious - the vast majority of people with forms of cancer that can be treated with chemotherapy will die.

Moest who are treated do not or at least have significantly higher survival rates. Chemo is brutal and very sad but saves lives. The treatments have been thoroughly tested over decades and newer treatments are coming out every year.

Chemo and radiations are "treatments". Treatments are not meant to cure, nor do they.

Yes they are and yes they do.

I have no idea what you seem to think treatments are supposed to do then.

Doctors treat cancer with the hope it will go into full remission. They cannot expect anything more than that. Have you ever heard of a doctor say, "Hey, we're going to cure your cancer with chemo/radiation."? No, you haven't. They say they will "treat" the patient with chemo and/or radiation.

Here, read this:
"Cure" vs. remission: The wording makes the difference | Scrubbing In

Yes it can come back. That really does not change anything.

You are splitting hairs here. They cannot fully tell if the cancer is totally cured or not but it certainly does cure many patients. All will continue monitoring in case it does come back from some cells missed.

I am not "splitting hairs" here. You claim (with no evidence) chemo and radiation cure cancers. I say they do not. Find some evidence chemo or radiation cure cancers. You wont because there isn't any. It takes a combination of many things to cure cancer and chemo and radiation are among the least likely to cure.

 

[Gracie]

Over and over I tell people this and nobody listens.


Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemotherapy, Not Cancer

People who refuse chemotherapy treatment live on average 12 and a half years longer than people who undergo chemotherapy, says Dr. Jones.

According to recent statistics, approximately 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women will develop cancer in their lifetimes. This saddening reality is made worse when it is acknowledged that modern methods of ‘treating’ the disease are often ineffective and only make the symptoms of the disease worse. In fact, according to one Berkeley doctor, chemotherapy doesn’t work 97% of the time.

Berkeley Doctor Claims People Die From Chemo, Not Cancer

Yup. Which is why I declined to have it after my mastectomy. And why I refuse RA meds. Same drugs, just in pill form or some kind of injection. I need my healthy cells, thankyouverymuch. Chemo kills it ALL off. I passed.