Ben Carson Blames Holocaust On Gun Control

Yes...his nazi thugs had complete access to guns....their opponents and victims...not so much.

again, your average German who wasn't a Nazi had no problem getting a gun. and those average Germans used those guns to keep fighting for Hitler until the country fell to invading armies.

If it took most of the rest of the world six years to beat Nazi Germany with tanks and bombers and battleships, what did you really think a couple of malcontents with guns were going to do?


We aren't talking about a couple of malcontents....in Switzerland...the only country not invaded and occupied, they had over 400,000 people armed and ready to fight the occupation...the rest of the countries listed in my post........once their weak militaries were defeated their populations were unarmed........

We have never seen what would happen to a well armed and ready population.....all genocides occur against unarmed civilians.....
 
Whole family's of blacks weren't rounded up and sent to gas chambers, You leftist idiot...WTF?:uhoh3: :slap:

Whole families were denied the right to vote, had their homes and businesses burned, saw their father taken out and lynched
They saw a government sworn to protect them ignore the atrocities being conducted against them

Shouldn't have armed blacks stood up and fought ?


Blacks were victims of genocide?.....You compare the U.S. to Nazi Germany?....You're a dumb ass and don't even realize it:uhoh3:
Blacks were the victims of rightwing terrorists
Those terrorists were protected by the government

Shouldn't armed blacks have protected themselves?


Blacks were victims of left wing, fascist, tyrants, the same people you support. Christians started the civil rights movement.and blacks were not rounded up and executed by the millions :slap:

3000 blacks were lynched

I didn't see blacks resorting to second amendment remedies


yes....they did....and the fact is.....the democrats used gun control to keep guns out of their hands...Rev. Martin Luther King tried to get a concealed carry permit and he was denied by the democrats.......

There were blacks who joined the NRA and set up chapters to fight off democrat thugs......
 
Gun nuts have this fantasy that in times of need they can run out with their trusty rifle and hold off the invading hordes

In reality, a Modern Army is trained to deal with insurgents. An Army like the Nazis, Soviets or Japanese of the 1940s would not only kill you but your whole family. If you think your town would protect you, they would wipe out your entire town.


Yeah....and when you are disarmed it makes it easier......all of the countries the Germans invaded....the civilian populations were disarmed...except for Switzerland.....400,000 armed civilians ready to fight.....and they weren't invaded.

Russia killed four million Germans. Armed civilians would be a speed bump. We saw how nazis responded to civilian resistance and it wasn't pretty. They killed not only you, but your family and maybe 100 random people from your town

Armed resistance from Jews would have made it easier for the Nazis. It would have enabled the propaganda machine to kick in full throttle by painting the Jews as dangerous threats to peaceful Germans. Any compassion for victimized Jews from the general population would be gone


And backward barbarians pushed us out of Iraq and Afghanistan with small arms and improvised bombs.........

You guys have no idea what you are talking about because there is not one example where a civilian population was well armed.......most normal people in these countries never had the right to have arms....and those few who did were disarmed before the genocide happened....

And that is exactly the point to our 2nd Amendment and why we need the same access to the small arms of our military and police forces....we are not their subjects...we are their bosses and they have no right to tell us what weapons we can have....we tell them what weapons they get...not the other way around....

And it is obvious that you guys do not understand the lessons of history and genocide......
 
Damnit, Jim! He's a doctor, not a lawyer! :slap:

a doctor who seems to be suffering from some type of mental illness

it's a sickness to prefer to be armed and fight? instead of unarmed and led to the slaughter? Who's really sick here lefty?:uhh:

Does he believe that armed blacks should have fought during the Civil Rights era?


Some in the deep south, democrat territory, did.....
 
Damnit, Jim! He's a doctor, not a lawyer! :slap:

a doctor who seems to be suffering from some type of mental illness

it's a sickness to prefer to be armed and fight? instead of unarmed and led to the slaughter? Who's really sick here lefty?:uhh:

Does he believe that armed blacks should have fought during the Civil Rights era?


Here you go...a little actual history...

National African American Gun Association

Deacons for Defense

On July 10, 1964, a group of African American men in Jonesboro, Louisiana led by Earnest “Chilly Willy” Thomas and Frederick Douglas Kirkpatrick founded the group known as The Deacons for Defense and Justice to protect members of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) against Ku Klux Klan violence. Most of the “Deacons” were veterans of World War II and the Korean War. The Jonesboro chapter organized its first affiliate chapter in nearby Bogalusa, Louisiana led by Charles Sims, A.Z. Young and Robert Hicks. The Deacons emerged as one of the first visible self-defense forces in the South and as such represented a new face of the civil rights movement. Traditional civil rights organizations remained silent on them or repudiated their activities. They were effective however in providing protection for local African Americans who sought to register to vote and for white and black civil rights workers in the area. The Deacons, for example, provided security for the 1966 March Against Fear from Memphis to Jackson, Mississippi. Moreover their presence in Southeastern Louisiana meant that the Klan would no longer be able to intimidate and terrorize local African Americans without challenge. Eventually they organized a third chapter in Louisiana. The Deacons tense confrontation with the Klan in Bogalusa was crucial in forcing the federal government to intervene on behalf of the local African American community.
 
Damnit, Jim! He's a doctor, not a lawyer! :slap:

a doctor who seems to be suffering from some type of mental illness

it's a sickness to prefer to be armed and fight? instead of unarmed and led to the slaughter? Who's really sick here lefty?:uhh:

Does he believe that armed blacks should have fought during the Civil Rights era?
Whole family's of blacks weren't rounded up and sent to gas chambers, You leftist idiot...WTF?:uhoh3: :slap:

Whole families were denied the right to vote, had their homes and businesses burned, saw their father taken out and lynched
They saw a government sworn to protect them ignore the atrocities being conducted against them

Shouldn't have armed blacks stood up and fought ?


Yes...the democrats did all of those things.....and some blacks did stand up.....this is why the democrat party should be disbanded and their money given to blacks as reparations for past atrocities against blacks...glad you agree......
 
it's a sickness to prefer to be armed and fight? instead of unarmed and led to the slaughter? Who's really sick here lefty?:uhh:

Does he believe that armed blacks should have fought during the Civil Rights era?
Whole family's of blacks weren't rounded up and sent to gas chambers, You leftist idiot...WTF?:uhoh3: :slap:

Whole families were denied the right to vote, had their homes and businesses burned, saw their father taken out and lynched
They saw a government sworn to protect them ignore the atrocities being conducted against them

Shouldn't have armed blacks stood up and fought ?


Blacks were victims of genocide?.....You compare the U.S. to Nazi Germany?....You're a dumb ass and don't even realize it:uhoh3:
Blacks were the victims of rightwing terrorists
Those terrorists were protected by the government

Shouldn't armed blacks have protected themselves?


Blacks were victims of the democrats......can't deny it....republicans tried to help blacks......the democrat controlled state governments did protect the democrat thugs attacking blacks....that is why the democrat party needs to be disbanned and their coffers drained to pay reparations to blacks....
 
Nat Turner (October 2, 1800 – November 11, 1831) was an African-American slave who led a slave rebellion of slaves and free blacks in Southampton County, Virginia on August 21, 1831 that resulted in 60 white deaths. He led a group of other slave followers carrying farm implements on a killing spree. As they went from plantation to plantation they gathered horses, guns, freed other slaves along the way, and recruited other blacks that wanted to join their revolt. At the end of their rebellion they were accused of the deaths of fifty white people.[2]

Let's see how many RW'ers here will sign in with their support for that event,

that watering of the Tree of Liberty...


he killed democrats who kept him and his people as slaves....and then Republicans came in and killed a bunch more democrats to make them stop owning slaves...

See.....the democrats believed in owning black people so much they went to war to keep them....that is how nuts democrats actually are...and why they should never hold political power.....that kind of nuts gets passed down....
 
Does he believe that armed blacks should have fought during the Civil Rights era?
Whole family's of blacks weren't rounded up and sent to gas chambers, You leftist idiot...WTF?:uhoh3: :slap:

Whole families were denied the right to vote, had their homes and businesses burned, saw their father taken out and lynched
They saw a government sworn to protect them ignore the atrocities being conducted against them

Shouldn't have armed blacks stood up and fought ?


Blacks were victims of genocide?.....You compare the U.S. to Nazi Germany?....You're a dumb ass and don't even realize it:uhoh3:
Blacks were the victims of rightwing terrorists
Those terrorists were protected by the government

Shouldn't armed blacks have protected themselves?

'2nd Amendment remedies' is an abbreviation for '2nd Amendment White remedies'.


Considering conservatives believe in gun rights for all Americans, blacks, hispanics, whites, asians, women......and you'll notice..it is actually the democrats who don't want blacks, hispanics and asians to own guns.......I wonder why that is....considering the violence they enacted against blacks before blacks had political power.....
 
Kill Nazis

Yeah. that's a plan.

A Jew kills one Nazi. The Nazis come back and kill a thousand Jews.


Or 100,000 Jews, well armed with rifles and pistols in each one of those countries fights a resistance so severe the nazis can never subjugate the country...and then add in the rest of the people and facing hundereds of thousands of armed, pissed off people who hate the invaders....yes, that is a problem.

And again....the civilian populations in all of those countries was unarmed...helpless once their weak militaries were defeated.......

And one of the primary reasons for our 2nd Amendment...for when the government can't or won't protect it's citizens.....
And the other big reason for the 2nd Amendment....when the government starts murdering some or all of its' citizens....

that is why we fight to keep AR-15s and other rifles.....so we and our descendants will never suffer the same genocide inflicted on the unarmed poplulations around the world....

You guys don't care to learn from history and you don't understand the dynamics of government sponsored mass murder...you are fools...and must be resited at all levels to keep our right to bear arms.
 
Why do you leftist love dead babies, but get excited when a new bacteria (life ) is discovered? You're also a Jew hater, who longs for dead Jews, and Israel's destruction

fetuses aren't babies. The women they are in don't consider them babies.

and frankly, you need to stop going to your "persecution complex" every time you are losing an argument.

"WHy do you hate me?" is what a five year old says when it's been scolded, it's really not an argument an adult should make.

The fetus is the batlle cry of the republicans (after benghazi of course). Yet they wouldn't care if babies and children died from lack of health care if it meant an increase in taxes. The only reason they are compassionate for the unborn.


That is a lie......there are more government sponsored programs for children than you can imagine, and then...on top of that, conservatives give more to chairites that help the poor than lefties do on top of that.....you guys like to say that so you can justify killing babies......you can lie about conservatives all you want...but why on earth would people who want to save the life of a baby in the womb forget that child when he is born....

That is what you nuts do.....you are willing to kill babies for parts....and then expect us to believe that you actually care about those babies when they are born....

What you are doing is called projection.......

Psychological projection - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Psychological projection, also known as blame shifting, is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against unpleasant impulses by denying their existence in themselves, while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude.
 
Whole family's of blacks weren't rounded up and sent to gas chambers, You leftist idiot...WTF?:uhoh3: :slap:

Whole families were denied the right to vote, had their homes and businesses burned, saw their father taken out and lynched
They saw a government sworn to protect them ignore the atrocities being conducted against them

Shouldn't have armed blacks stood up and fought ?


Blacks were victims of genocide?.....You compare the U.S. to Nazi Germany?....You're a dumb ass and don't even realize it:uhoh3:
Blacks were the victims of rightwing terrorists
Those terrorists were protected by the government

Shouldn't armed blacks have protected themselves?

Right wing? How were the Democrats who terrorized blacks "right wing," comrade big guy?

They were self-described conservatives.


Yes...their conservatism sought to keep blacks as slaves.....

Modern American Conservatives seek to preserve the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence...you know the documents that created our concept of all men being created equal....

The democrats....wanted to keep slaves.......

See the difference between what is to be conserved?
 
Whole families were denied the right to vote, had their homes and businesses burned, saw their father taken out and lynched
They saw a government sworn to protect them ignore the atrocities being conducted against them

Shouldn't have armed blacks stood up and fought ?


Blacks were victims of genocide?.....You compare the U.S. to Nazi Germany?....You're a dumb ass and don't even realize it:uhoh3:
Blacks were the victims of rightwing terrorists
Those terrorists were protected by the government

Shouldn't armed blacks have protected themselves?


Blacks were victims of left wing, fascist, tyrants, the same people you support. Christians started the civil rights movement.and blacks were not rounded up and executed by the millions :slap:

3000 blacks were lynched

I didn't see blacks resorting to second amendment remedies


yes....they did....and the fact is.....the democrats used gun control to keep guns out of their hands...Rev. Martin Luther King tried to get a concealed carry permit and he was denied by the democrats.......

There were blacks who joined the NRA and set up chapters to fight off democrat thugs......

Which proves.......nothing

Show where blacks ( and yes many, many blacks had guns) used them to fight a tyrannical government or the terrorists
 
Whole families were denied the right to vote, had their homes and businesses burned, saw their father taken out and lynched
They saw a government sworn to protect them ignore the atrocities being conducted against them

Shouldn't have armed blacks stood up and fought ?


Blacks were victims of genocide?.....You compare the U.S. to Nazi Germany?....You're a dumb ass and don't even realize it:uhoh3:
Blacks were the victims of rightwing terrorists
Those terrorists were protected by the government

Shouldn't armed blacks have protected themselves?

Right wing? How were the Democrats who terrorized blacks "right wing," comrade big guy?

They were self-described conservatives.


Yes...their conservatism sought to keep blacks as slaves.....

Modern American Conservatives seek to preserve the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence...you know the documents that created our concept of all men being created equal....

The democrats....wanted to keep slaves.......

See the difference between what is to be conserved?
Hmmm.....modern American conservatives vs Democrats from 150 years ago
 
Blacks were victims of genocide?.....You compare the U.S. to Nazi Germany?....You're a dumb ass and don't even realize it:uhoh3:
Blacks were the victims of rightwing terrorists
Those terrorists were protected by the government

Shouldn't armed blacks have protected themselves?

Right wing? How were the Democrats who terrorized blacks "right wing," comrade big guy?

They were self-described conservatives.


Yes...their conservatism sought to keep blacks as slaves.....

Modern American Conservatives seek to preserve the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence...you know the documents that created our concept of all men being created equal....

The democrats....wanted to keep slaves.......

See the difference between what is to be conserved?
Hmmm.....modern American conservatives vs Democrats from 150 years ago


Yes....completely different in their conservatism.....Modern American Conservatives are what were once known as "Liberals" the true liberals...not the progressive/statists who have hijacked the term "liberal" to hide their true anti freedom natures.
 
A Fox News contributor has offered a bizarre defense of Republican presidential candidate Ben Carson’s assertion that the Holocaust was the result of Nazi gun control.

Dr. Keith Ablow, a psychiatrist and member of Fox News’ “Medical A-Team,” wrote in a Friday op-ed column that Ben Carson is "right" and the Anti-Defamation League -- an anti-Semitism watchdog that called Carson’s claims “historically inaccurate” -- is "wrong."

More: Fox News Doctor: Ben Carson Was Right About Guns And The Holocaust

lucy-peanuts-the-doctor-is-in.jpg


Keith Ablow is goofy.
 
Blacks were the victims of rightwing terrorists
Those terrorists were protected by the government

Shouldn't armed blacks have protected themselves?

Right wing? How were the Democrats who terrorized blacks "right wing," comrade big guy?

They were self-described conservatives.


Yes...their conservatism sought to keep blacks as slaves.....

Modern American Conservatives seek to preserve the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence...you know the documents that created our concept of all men being created equal....

The democrats....wanted to keep slaves.......

See the difference between what is to be conserved?
Hmmm.....modern American conservatives vs Democrats from 150 years ago


Yes....completely different in their conservatism.....Modern American Conservatives are what were once known as "Liberals" the true liberals...not the progressive/statists who have hijacked the term "liberal" to hide their true anti freedom natures.

It's fun when you get to make up your own words isn't it?
 
Six million armed Jews could have kicked some serious Nazis ass but that didn't happen because the National Socialist didn't allow the Jews to have weapons.

Just like the Democrat Party doesn't want the American people to have the ability to keep and bear arms.
 
Right wing? How were the Democrats who terrorized blacks "right wing," comrade big guy?

They were self-described conservatives.


Yes...their conservatism sought to keep blacks as slaves.....

Modern American Conservatives seek to preserve the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights and the Declaration of Independence...you know the documents that created our concept of all men being created equal....

The democrats....wanted to keep slaves.......

See the difference between what is to be conserved?
Hmmm.....modern American conservatives vs Democrats from 150 years ago


Yes....completely different in their conservatism.....Modern American Conservatives are what were once known as "Liberals" the true liberals...not the progressive/statists who have hijacked the term "liberal" to hide their true anti freedom natures.

It's fun when you get to make up your own words isn't it?


Nope...American Conservatives actually fit the definition of Liberal.....those who hide their statist, anti freedom beliefs by taking the name liberal do not.
 
Six million armed Jews could have kicked some serious Nazis ass but that didn't happen because the National Socialist didn't allow the Jews to have weapons.

Just like the Democrat Party doesn't want the American people to have the ability to keep and bear arms.

More gun nut fantasy

Women, Children and Old men do not make much of an army

Neither does a random assembly of gun owners with no leadership, no safe harbor , no logistics or supplies and no training

The Germans would have characterized the armed horde of Jews as terrorists and nobody would have offered them any assistance
 

Forum List

Back
Top