Beck, Open book test.

Seems this thread is invisible to the most vocal of Becks critics.
reminds me of another thread.
 
Mr. Fitnah, thanks for posting all that. I forgot why I hated that idiot so much.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NF4PbqJsRH4]YouTube - Glenn Beck LOSES IT (Radio Show Freak-Out)[/ame]

I love this one...Beck says Obama is very white, yet recently he said Obama hates whites..?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0tgvWxC_6A&feature=related]YouTube - Glenn Beck Admits That He Is A Racist[/ame]

one of my favs...Beck who lied. Then he came on the second day, and backed up his lie. Funny stuff.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8KuqOSaCws]YouTube - Glenn Beck Caught Lying[/ame]
 
Mr. Fitnah, thanks for posting all that. I forgot why I hated that idiot so much.
Sorry you have failed to understand the point of the thread.
The purpose is for you to identify in the complete broadcast the idiocy and lies you find in the broadcast, not creatively edited clip.
This is an entire show.
Im sure you can find the offending traits.
Please make note of the time of the offending remarks for all to see.
 
Beck's pretty lame. I answered avatar's OP and then neglected to notice it was all Glenn Beck questions. The first question asserts that Medicare is an unfunded liability to the tune of $100T. Which is off by a substantial order of magnitude.......what we call: not even in the ballpark. Doesn't he have fact checkers?

I won't be watching his show. I think there's something in the Geneva Convention about not being forced to do so.
 
Beck's pretty lame. I answered avatar's OP and then neglected to notice it was all Glenn Beck questions. The first question asserts that Medicare is an unfunded liability to the tune of $100T. Which is off by a substantial order of magnitude.......what we call: not even in the ballpark. Doesn't he have fact checkers?

I won't be watching his show. I think there's something in the Geneva Convention about not being forced to do so.
I believe you misheard. Please document the time and video you are referring to
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
 
Not really.......it means weakened...so narrow, in the sense of the way you are using it means it has less ........not that it is restricted to input, as is your intention. You are not attempting to diminish, but specify.
 
He's correct; it doesn't really make sense in that context. Then again, most of what you say doesn't make sense in any context, so "attenuate" away, Fitnuts. :lol:
 
Not really.......it means weakened...so narrow, in the sense of the way you are using it means it has less ........not that it is restricted to input, as is your intention. You are not attempting to diminish, but specify.
What do you judge the unfunded debt to be based on the debt clock?

Never the least the intention is to narrow the focus to exclude randomly edited clips and make a fair judgement of complete episodes .
If you have no interest in participating in a meaningful way, good day if so, proceed.
 
Yesterdays show seemed a little to hard to pick apart so here is todays show.
Part 1
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9FLM0AzWXJo]YouTube - CZAR WARS 1[/ame]
Part 2
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDJSZ4MOrp0]YouTube - CZAR WARS 2[/ame]
Part 3
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnQmMiN3g2A]YouTube - CZAR WARS 3[/ame]
Part 4
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kX8dPofcwcE]YouTube - CZAR WARS 4[/ame]
Part 5
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuK5XP1QZno]YouTube - CZAR WARS 5[/ame]
Part 6
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUr3ifWpJ9k]YouTube - CZAR WARS 6[/ame]
 
As before, please watch the clips and document according to the timeline where the offenses happen.
 
Not really.......it means weakened...so narrow, in the sense of the way you are using it means it has less ........not that it is restricted to input, as is your intention. You are not attempting to diminish, but specify.
What do you judge the unfunded debt to be based on the debt clock?

Never the least the intention is to narrow the focus to exclude randomly edited clips and make a fair judgement of complete episodes .
If you have no interest in participating in a meaningful way, good day if so, proceed.

Our unfunded liability for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid is close to $100 trillion. Is there any way to pay for these programs without bankrupting America?

That is Beck's written assertion to which I was referring.^

I see he has added more "reasonable questions" since that was at the top of the list [earlier today]. It has nothing to do with a debt clock or unfunded debt. It is a specific statement that is so egregiously incorrect so as to be ridiculous and it hasn't been corrected. In my estimation the statement is so absurd, and that it has been repeated here, and undoubtedly elsewhere without question or correction, not even by Beck or anyone else, that no one can take Beck or his followers seriously. IOW, until something like this is cleared up, corrected, retracted, and fully accounted for, there's no point in listening to anything else he has to say.

He's either lazy, incompetent or a liar or all three.
 
AS I asked since you assert he is incorrect in his estimation of the unfunded debt attributed to SS MC MA ,And as he was reading off the national debt clock what in your estimation is the actual unfunded debt for those programs ?

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

Convince me.
 
Convince you?

Read your own debt clock, the entire debt is under 12T.


Is that convincing enough?

I am convinced you can't think for yourself.
 
Social Security versus Medicare. Politi cians and the media focus on Social Security's financial health, but Medicare's future liabilities are far more ominous, at more than $89 trillion. Medicare's total unfunded liability is more than five times larger than that of Social Security. In fact, the new Medicare prescription drug benefit enacted in 2006 (Part D) alone adds some $17 trillion to the projected Medicare shortfall - an amount greater than all of Social Security's unfunded obligations.

Social Security and Medicare Projections:*2009 - Brief Analysis #662

I see you are a little confused over the terms .No biggy.
The unfunded debt is debts that are promised in the future that have no funding in the budget, The will be paid by fiat money , borrowed fiat money that will further increase the national debt.

Bottom line: Taxpayers are now on the hook for a record $59.1 trillion in liabilities, a 2.3% increase from 2006. That amount is equal to $516,348 for every U.S. household. By comparison, U.S. households owe an average of $112,043 for mortgages, car loans, credit cards and all other debt combined.

Taxpayers on the hook for $59 trillion
Updated 5/29/2007 8:33 AM

Taxpayers on the hook for $59 trillion - USATODAY.com
 
Last edited:
Convince you?

Read your own debt clock, the entire debt is under 12T.


Is that convincing enough?

I am convinced you can't think for yourself.

I am now absolutely conviced that Obama has driven his followers insane
 
Not really.......it means weakened...so narrow, in the sense of the way you are using it means it has less ........not that it is restricted to input, as is your intention. You are not attempting to diminish, but specify.
What do you judge the unfunded debt to be based on the debt clock?

Never the least the intention is to narrow the focus to exclude randomly edited clips and make a fair judgement of complete episodes .
If you have no interest in participating in a meaningful way, good day if so, proceed.

Our unfunded liability for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid is close to $100 trillion. Is there any way to pay for these programs without bankrupting America?

That is Beck's written assertion to which I was referring.^

I see he has added more "reasonable questions" since that was at the top of the list [earlier today]. It has nothing to do with a debt clock or unfunded debt. It is a specific statement that is so egregiously incorrect so as to be ridiculous and it hasn't been corrected. In my estimation the statement is so absurd, and that it has been repeated here, and undoubtedly elsewhere without question or correction, not even by Beck or anyone else, that no one can take Beck or his followers seriously. IOW, until something like this is cleared up, corrected, retracted, and fully accounted for, there's no point in listening to anything else he has to say.

He's either lazy, incompetent or a liar or all three.
Has that been cleared up enough for you?
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1455176-post56.html
Are you willing to listen now ?

I guess he bugged out.

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free ... it expects what never was and never will be."
TJ
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top