Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
My fears are prompted by my egalitarian based beliefs. Your beliefs are prompted by your anti-egalitarian notion that non-whites are inherently superior.So your fears are prompted by thoughts of retaliation? Havent you learned that fear is the worst thing you can base a logical argument on?It is racist and anti-egalitarian. By claiming that non-whites will not so much as punish whites unjustly for the documented and perceived past once they gain full control, you are in fact claiming non-whites are inherently morally superior to whites. Once old white conservatives die there will simply be less white people in power or on the voter rolls, and that will lead to ample opportunity to oppress white people throughout the world for anti-white racists.I disagree that its racist or anti-egalitarian. Its just facts. As the races understand and accept more about each other after the death of old white conservatives, there will be less hate and divisiveness.That is a very racist, anti-progressive, anti-egalitarian line of thinking that will doom the world to endless racial conflict and bloodshed.When people say that the racists are dying out they are talking about old white people that are primarily conservatives. When they die out no one will have any reason to be racist anymore.Tumblr and Twitter are just "safe spaces" for the most stupid and insane among the Democrats, but this kind of thinking permeates all university campuses by way of scum like Tim Wise and Robert Jensen.
Hidden Racism in 'The Heart of Whiteness'
If society was really serious about considering non-white racism no one would dare utter such nonsense as "racists are dying out", or the often quoted partisan drivel like "not all Republicans are racist, but all racists are Republican".
If non-white racism was actually considered the Democrats and all supposedly left wing, western political parties would be freaking out, because nearly 100% of all registered black racists vote for their party, and all registered Hispanic racists vote for their party, and nearly all Islamic supremacists vote for their party etc.
Without the anti-white vote Democrats would be in some deep shit, and they realize this. How else do you think Democrats could get away with making a personally obituary on dozens of "anti-racist" and "progressive" sites for a racist bitch like Francis Cress Welsing when she poisoned hundreds, if not thousands of minds with her extreme racism against white people?
Dr. Frances C. Welsing, 80, renowned psychiatrist best known for her views on the origins of white racism
"Renowned psychiatrist" my ass.
An egalitarian progressive-minded person would automatically think that the death of old white racists and the overall decrease of the white population would simply mean that the face of racism was changing along with the racial demographics and that anti-racist efforts would also need to drastically change focus to counteract it.
This is the real reason why you scum fear white identity politics. White identity politics more directly corresponds to egalitarianism than "anti-racism" does.
Everyone has long been accustomed to white identity politics. its been pushed in the school systems every since schools were erected in the US. There is a reason white people claim a white person discovered america even though they freely admit NA's were sitting right there watching them come ashore as illegal aliens.
White identity politics is politics explicitly talking about race issues concerning the white communities of America and the world. There has never been any mainstream white racial politics in the western world, not even from the "far right" parties in Europe where they need it most.
If white racial politics ever became mainstream the Democrats and their leftist allies in Europe would quickly become extinct, because their nonsense about "dog whistles" would merely be seen as an existential threat to white communities everywhere and they would be frequently called out as such until they are forced to abandon that rhetoric to stay politically relevant.
Teachers and historians saying Columbus discovered America is not even anything remotely like white racial identity politics. Columbus did discover America...for Europeans who thought there weren't any more large landmasses to be discovered. It would be far different if Native Americans came to Europe somehow and told Europeans about America before Columbus or Vespucci made their voyages around there(and technically that would mean Native Americans discovered Europe for their people back on the American mainland).
BTW the NA's did tell Columbus that Africans had been there prior to his arrival.
Koreans are not a separate race from the Japanese. Youre talking about tribalism or nationalism again.There wasnt a concept of race until whites came up with it either.Nope. Tribal or nationalism is instinctive. As far as I can tell whites are the ones that decided to be racists.Racism is instinctive. Or pretty close to it, since humans are the one species with the least attachment to instinct.
There weren't too many multi-racial tribes.
You've never heard, for example, of Korean vs. Japanese race hatred?
We have paintings that are thousands of years old depicting white people and other Caucasians in the same racist manner that East Asians often depict us as now....That fact has never been debunked. Claiming it has is silly.That idea has long since been debunked. East Asians were racist to Caucasians of all stripes long before any Europeans started being racial.There wasnt a concept of race until whites came up with it either.Nope. Tribal or nationalism is instinctive. As far as I can tell whites are the ones that decided to be racists.Racism is instinctive. Or pretty close to it, since humans are the one species with the least attachment to instinct.
There weren't too many multi-racial tribes.
Not to mention the Arabs being racist to blacks in Ancient Egypt.
None needed. You have just rebutted yourself.My fears are prompted by my egalitarian based beliefs. You beliefs are prompted by your anti-egalitarian notion that non-whites are inherently superior.So your fears are prompted by thoughts of retaliation? Havent you learned that fear is the worst thing you can base a logical argument on?It is racist and anti-egalitarian. By claiming that non-whites will not so much as punish whites unjustly for the documented and perceived past once they gain full control, you are in fact claiming non-whites are inherently morally superior to whites. Once old white conservatives die there will simply be less white people in power or on the voter rolls, and that will lead to ample opportunity to oppress white people throughout the world for anti-white racists.I disagree that its racist or anti-egalitarian. Its just facts. As the races understand and accept more about each other after the death of old white conservatives, there will be less hate and divisiveness.That is a very racist, anti-progressive, anti-egalitarian line of thinking that will doom the world to endless racial conflict and bloodshed.When people say that the racists are dying out they are talking about old white people that are primarily conservatives. When they die out no one will have any reason to be racist anymore.
An egalitarian progressive-minded person would automatically think that the death of old white racists and the overall decrease of the white population would simply mean that the face of racism was changing along with the racial demographics and that anti-racist efforts would also need to drastically change focus to counteract it.
This is the real reason why you scum fear white identity politics. White identity politics more directly corresponds to egalitarianism than "anti-racism" does.
Everyone has long been accustomed to white identity politics. its been pushed in the school systems every since schools were erected in the US. There is a reason white people claim a white person discovered america even though they freely admit NA's were sitting right there watching them come ashore as illegal aliens.
White identity politics is politics explicitly talking about race issues concerning the white communities of America and the world. There has never been any mainstream white racial politics in the western world, not even from the "far right" parties in Europe where they need it most.
If white racial politics ever became mainstream the Democrats and their leftist allies in Europe would quickly become extinct, because their nonsense about "dog whistles" would merely be seen as an existential threat to white communities everywhere and they would be frequently called out as such until they are forced to abandon that rhetoric to stay politically relevant.
Teachers and historians saying Columbus discovered America is not even anything remotely like white racial identity politics. Columbus did discover America...for Europeans who thought there weren't any more large landmasses to be discovered. It would be far different if Native Americans came to Europe somehow and told Europeans about America before Columbus or Vespucci made their voyages around there(and technically that would mean Native Americans discovered Europe for their people back on the American mainland).
BTW the NA's did tell Columbus that Africans had been there prior to his arrival.
You have no counter argument to rebut this notion.
You clearly don't understand egalitarianism.None needed. You have just rebutted yourself.My fears are prompted by my egalitarian based beliefs. You beliefs are prompted by your anti-egalitarian notion that non-whites are inherently superior.So your fears are prompted by thoughts of retaliation? Havent you learned that fear is the worst thing you can base a logical argument on?It is racist and anti-egalitarian. By claiming that non-whites will not so much as punish whites unjustly for the documented and perceived past once they gain full control, you are in fact claiming non-whites are inherently morally superior to whites. Once old white conservatives die there will simply be less white people in power or on the voter rolls, and that will lead to ample opportunity to oppress white people throughout the world for anti-white racists.I disagree that its racist or anti-egalitarian. Its just facts. As the races understand and accept more about each other after the death of old white conservatives, there will be less hate and divisiveness.That is a very racist, anti-progressive, anti-egalitarian line of thinking that will doom the world to endless racial conflict and bloodshed.
An egalitarian progressive-minded person would automatically think that the death of old white racists and the overall decrease of the white population would simply mean that the face of racism was changing along with the racial demographics and that anti-racist efforts would also need to drastically change focus to counteract it.
This is the real reason why you scum fear white identity politics. White identity politics more directly corresponds to egalitarianism than "anti-racism" does.
Everyone has long been accustomed to white identity politics. its been pushed in the school systems every since schools were erected in the US. There is a reason white people claim a white person discovered america even though they freely admit NA's were sitting right there watching them come ashore as illegal aliens.
White identity politics is politics explicitly talking about race issues concerning the white communities of America and the world. There has never been any mainstream white racial politics in the western world, not even from the "far right" parties in Europe where they need it most.
If white racial politics ever became mainstream the Democrats and their leftist allies in Europe would quickly become extinct, because their nonsense about "dog whistles" would merely be seen as an existential threat to white communities everywhere and they would be frequently called out as such until they are forced to abandon that rhetoric to stay politically relevant.
Teachers and historians saying Columbus discovered America is not even anything remotely like white racial identity politics. Columbus did discover America...for Europeans who thought there weren't any more large landmasses to be discovered. It would be far different if Native Americans came to Europe somehow and told Europeans about America before Columbus or Vespucci made their voyages around there(and technically that would mean Native Americans discovered Europe for their people back on the American mainland).
BTW the NA's did tell Columbus that Africans had been there prior to his arrival.
You have no counter argument to rebut this notion.
Who told you they thought a different tribe was a race? Are you seriously suggesting primitive tribes looked at other tribes and thought they were a different race from them even though they looked alike?Koreans are not a separate race from the Japanese. Youre talking about tribalism or nationalism again.There wasnt a concept of race until whites came up with it either.Nope. Tribal or nationalism is instinctive. As far as I can tell whites are the ones that decided to be racists.
There weren't too many multi-racial tribes.
You've never heard, for example, of Korean vs. Japanese race hatred?
To the primitive tribes it was race. They didn't have masters degrees in anthropology.
They often named themselves in words that simply meant 'the People'. They were the people, the outsiders weren't people.
Obviously you suffer from what you just accused me of.You clearly don't understand egalitarianism.None needed. You have just rebutted yourself.My fears are prompted by my egalitarian based beliefs. You beliefs are prompted by your anti-egalitarian notion that non-whites are inherently superior.So your fears are prompted by thoughts of retaliation? Havent you learned that fear is the worst thing you can base a logical argument on?It is racist and anti-egalitarian. By claiming that non-whites will not so much as punish whites unjustly for the documented and perceived past once they gain full control, you are in fact claiming non-whites are inherently morally superior to whites. Once old white conservatives die there will simply be less white people in power or on the voter rolls, and that will lead to ample opportunity to oppress white people throughout the world for anti-white racists.I disagree that its racist or anti-egalitarian. Its just facts. As the races understand and accept more about each other after the death of old white conservatives, there will be less hate and divisiveness.
Everyone has long been accustomed to white identity politics. its been pushed in the school systems every since schools were erected in the US. There is a reason white people claim a white person discovered america even though they freely admit NA's were sitting right there watching them come ashore as illegal aliens.
White identity politics is politics explicitly talking about race issues concerning the white communities of America and the world. There has never been any mainstream white racial politics in the western world, not even from the "far right" parties in Europe where they need it most.
If white racial politics ever became mainstream the Democrats and their leftist allies in Europe would quickly become extinct, because their nonsense about "dog whistles" would merely be seen as an existential threat to white communities everywhere and they would be frequently called out as such until they are forced to abandon that rhetoric to stay politically relevant.
Teachers and historians saying Columbus discovered America is not even anything remotely like white racial identity politics. Columbus did discover America...for Europeans who thought there weren't any more large landmasses to be discovered. It would be far different if Native Americans came to Europe somehow and told Europeans about America before Columbus or Vespucci made their voyages around there(and technically that would mean Native Americans discovered Europe for their people back on the American mainland).
BTW the NA's did tell Columbus that Africans had been there prior to his arrival.
You have no counter argument to rebut this notion.
What does that mean to you and what does that have to do with whites coming up wth racism?We have paintings that are thousands of years old depicting white people and other Caucasians in the same racist manner that East Asians often depict us as now....That fact has never been debunked. Claiming it has is silly.That idea has long since been debunked. East Asians were racist to Caucasians of all stripes long before any Europeans started being racial.There wasnt a concept of race until whites came up with it either.Nope. Tribal or nationalism is instinctive. As far as I can tell whites are the ones that decided to be racists.
There weren't too many multi-racial tribes.
Not to mention the Arabs being racist to blacks in Ancient Egypt.
It proves that white people didn't come up with racism....What does that mean to you and what does that have to do with whites coming up wth racism?We have paintings that are thousands of years old depicting white people and other Caucasians in the same racist manner that East Asians often depict us as now....That fact has never been debunked. Claiming it has is silly.That idea has long since been debunked. East Asians were racist to Caucasians of all stripes long before any Europeans started being racial.There wasnt a concept of race until whites came up with it either.There weren't too many multi-racial tribes.
Not to mention the Arabs being racist to blacks in Ancient Egypt.
I think it proves Asians figured out whites were lying racists, hence the long noses ala Pinocchio.It proves that white people didn't come up with racism....What does that mean to you and what does that have to do with whites coming up wth racism?We have paintings that are thousands of years old depicting white people and other Caucasians in the same racist manner that East Asians often depict us as now....That fact has never been debunked. Claiming it has is silly.That idea has long since been debunked. East Asians were racist to Caucasians of all stripes long before any Europeans started being racial.There wasnt a concept of race until whites came up with it either.
Not to mention the Arabs being racist to blacks in Ancient Egypt.
Unless you are stupid enough to believe that Asians thousands of years ago painted Caucasians with exaggerated long beak noses because they thought that was attractive....
True. I am obviously more of an egalitarian than you will ever even attempt to be.Obviously you suffer from what you just accused me of.You clearly don't understand egalitarianism.None needed. You have just rebutted yourself.My fears are prompted by my egalitarian based beliefs. You beliefs are prompted by your anti-egalitarian notion that non-whites are inherently superior.So your fears are prompted by thoughts of retaliation? Havent you learned that fear is the worst thing you can base a logical argument on?It is racist and anti-egalitarian. By claiming that non-whites will not so much as punish whites unjustly for the documented and perceived past once they gain full control, you are in fact claiming non-whites are inherently morally superior to whites. Once old white conservatives die there will simply be less white people in power or on the voter rolls, and that will lead to ample opportunity to oppress white people throughout the world for anti-white racists.
White identity politics is politics explicitly talking about race issues concerning the white communities of America and the world. There has never been any mainstream white racial politics in the western world, not even from the "far right" parties in Europe where they need it most.
If white racial politics ever became mainstream the Democrats and their leftist allies in Europe would quickly become extinct, because their nonsense about "dog whistles" would merely be seen as an existential threat to white communities everywhere and they would be frequently called out as such until they are forced to abandon that rhetoric to stay politically relevant.
Teachers and historians saying Columbus discovered America is not even anything remotely like white racial identity politics. Columbus did discover America...for Europeans who thought there weren't any more large landmasses to be discovered. It would be far different if Native Americans came to Europe somehow and told Europeans about America before Columbus or Vespucci made their voyages around there(and technically that would mean Native Americans discovered Europe for their people back on the American mainland).
BTW the NA's did tell Columbus that Africans had been there prior to his arrival.
You have no counter argument to rebut this notion.
When idiots like you die off the world will truly be closer to racial harmony.I think it proves Asians figured out whites were lying racists, hence the long noses ala Pinocchio.It proves that white people didn't come up with racism....What does that mean to you and what does that have to do with whites coming up wth racism?We have paintings that are thousands of years old depicting white people and other Caucasians in the same racist manner that East Asians often depict us as now....That fact has never been debunked. Claiming it has is silly.That idea has long since been debunked. East Asians were racist to Caucasians of all stripes long before any Europeans started being racial.
Not to mention the Arabs being racist to blacks in Ancient Egypt.
Unless you are stupid enough to believe that Asians thousands of years ago painted Caucasians with exaggerated long beak noses because they thought that was attractive....
You never answered why you thought those pictures proved Asians were racist before whites? What year were the pictures done? i think you are going to feel embarrassed.When idiots like you die off the world will truly be closer to racial harmony.I think it proves Asians figured out whites were lying racists, hence the long noses ala Pinocchio.It proves that white people didn't come up with racism....What does that mean to you and what does that have to do with whites coming up wth racism?We have paintings that are thousands of years old depicting white people and other Caucasians in the same racist manner that East Asians often depict us as now....That fact has never been debunked. Claiming it has is silly.
Unless you are stupid enough to believe that Asians thousands of years ago painted Caucasians with exaggerated long beak noses because they thought that was attractive....
Over 1000 years before Europe was even a colonial empire.You never answered why you thought those pictures proved Asians were racist before whites? What year were the pictures done? i think you are going to feel embarrassed.When idiots like you die off the world will truly be closer to racial harmony.I think it proves Asians figured out whites were lying racists, hence the long noses ala Pinocchio.It proves that white people didn't come up with racism....What does that mean to you and what does that have to do with whites coming up wth racism?We have paintings that are thousands of years old depicting white people and other Caucasians in the same racist manner that East Asians often depict us as now....
Unless you are stupid enough to believe that Asians thousands of years ago painted Caucasians with exaggerated long beak noses because they thought that was attractive....
What year was that? Lets get a specific date to work with.Over 1000 years before Europe was even a colonial empire.You never answered why you thought those pictures proved Asians were racist before whites? What year were the pictures done? i think you are going to feel embarrassed.When idiots like you die off the world will truly be closer to racial harmony.I think it proves Asians figured out whites were lying racists, hence the long noses ala Pinocchio.It proves that white people didn't come up with racism....What does that mean to you and what does that have to do with whites coming up wth racism?
Unless you are stupid enough to believe that Asians thousands of years ago painted Caucasians with exaggerated long beak noses because they thought that was attractive....
Tumblr and Twitter are just "safe spaces" for the most stupid and insane among the Democrats, but this kind of thinking permeates all university campuses by way of scum like Tim Wise and Robert Jensen.Why? So you can pretend I didn't come up with any and take some joy out of the fact you wasted minutes of my life?Minorities. Social Justice lunatics.Who said minorities cannot be racist?
Democrats who vote for Hillary.
Specifically, who? Quotes and links would be nice.
The newest trend in tumblr and Twitter looney tune land is to claim white women can't be raped because of their "white privilege", and there is a reason why these psychopaths are emboldened.
So, you can't find anyone outside of twitter or tumblr who says minorities can't be racist. Not one prominent person? There has to be someone, right?
One last time, who says minorities can't be racist?
Hidden Racism in 'The Heart of Whiteness'
If society was really serious about considering non-white racism no one would dare utter such nonsense as "racists are dying out", or the often quoted partisan drivel like "not all Republicans are racist, but all racists are Republican".
If non-white racism was actually considered the Democrats and all supposedly left wing, western political parties would be freaking out, because nearly 100% of all registered black racists vote for their party, and all registered Hispanic racists vote for their party, and nearly all Islamic supremacists vote for their party etc.
Without the anti-white vote Democrats would be in some deep shit, and they realize this. How else do you think Democrats could get away with making a personally obituary on dozens of "anti-racist" and "progressive" sites for a racist bitch like Francis Cress Welsing when she poisoned hundreds, if not thousands of minds with her extreme racism against white people?
Dr. Frances C. Welsing, 80, renowned psychiatrist best known for her views on the origins of white racism
"Renowned psychiatrist" my ass.
White Democrats are a small and shrinking part of the white population as a whole(I wonder why...) that only has political power because of racist non-whites voting in blocks for them after they sufficiently demonstrate their aptitude for self hatred.Tumblr and Twitter are just "safe spaces" for the most stupid and insane among the Democrats, but this kind of thinking permeates all university campuses by way of scum like Tim Wise and Robert Jensen.Why? So you can pretend I didn't come up with any and take some joy out of the fact you wasted minutes of my life?Minorities. Social Justice lunatics.
Democrats who vote for Hillary.
Specifically, who? Quotes and links would be nice.
The newest trend in tumblr and Twitter looney tune land is to claim white women can't be raped because of their "white privilege", and there is a reason why these psychopaths are emboldened.
So, you can't find anyone outside of twitter or tumblr who says minorities can't be racist. Not one prominent person? There has to be someone, right?
One last time, who says minorities can't be racist?
Hidden Racism in 'The Heart of Whiteness'
If society was really serious about considering non-white racism no one would dare utter such nonsense as "racists are dying out", or the often quoted partisan drivel like "not all Republicans are racist, but all racists are Republican".
If non-white racism was actually considered the Democrats and all supposedly left wing, western political parties would be freaking out, because nearly 100% of all registered black racists vote for their party, and all registered Hispanic racists vote for their party, and nearly all Islamic supremacists vote for their party etc.
Without the anti-white vote Democrats would be in some deep shit, and they realize this. How else do you think Democrats could get away with making a personally obituary on dozens of "anti-racist" and "progressive" sites for a racist bitch like Francis Cress Welsing when she poisoned hundreds, if not thousands of minds with her extreme racism against white people?
Dr. Frances C. Welsing, 80, renowned psychiatrist best known for her views on the origins of white racism
"Renowned psychiatrist" my ass.
You're a nut. Most Democrats are white. I can't help it if Republicans have lost virtually all minorities but don't blame Democrats because they are more diverse.
White Democrats are a small and shrinking part of the white population as a whole(I wonder why...) that only has political power because of racist non-whites voting in blocks for them after they sufficiently demonstrate their aptitude for self hatred.Tumblr and Twitter are just "safe spaces" for the most stupid and insane among the Democrats, but this kind of thinking permeates all university campuses by way of scum like Tim Wise and Robert Jensen.Why? So you can pretend I didn't come up with any and take some joy out of the fact you wasted minutes of my life?Specifically, who? Quotes and links would be nice.
The newest trend in tumblr and Twitter looney tune land is to claim white women can't be raped because of their "white privilege", and there is a reason why these psychopaths are emboldened.
So, you can't find anyone outside of twitter or tumblr who says minorities can't be racist. Not one prominent person? There has to be someone, right?
One last time, who says minorities can't be racist?
Hidden Racism in 'The Heart of Whiteness'
If society was really serious about considering non-white racism no one would dare utter such nonsense as "racists are dying out", or the often quoted partisan drivel like "not all Republicans are racist, but all racists are Republican".
If non-white racism was actually considered the Democrats and all supposedly left wing, western political parties would be freaking out, because nearly 100% of all registered black racists vote for their party, and all registered Hispanic racists vote for their party, and nearly all Islamic supremacists vote for their party etc.
Without the anti-white vote Democrats would be in some deep shit, and they realize this. How else do you think Democrats could get away with making a personally obituary on dozens of "anti-racist" and "progressive" sites for a racist bitch like Francis Cress Welsing when she poisoned hundreds, if not thousands of minds with her extreme racism against white people?
Dr. Frances C. Welsing, 80, renowned psychiatrist best known for her views on the origins of white racism
"Renowned psychiatrist" my ass.
You're a nut. Most Democrats are white. I can't help it if Republicans have lost virtually all minorities but don't blame Democrats because they are more diverse.
After Hillary there likely never will be a white Democrat presidential nominee ever again.
You neglected to give me a solid date. It doesnt have to be exact but it should be within a century or so. Are you stalling or did you do some research and found out that whites started racism?White Democrats are a small and shrinking part of the white population as a whole(I wonder why...) that only has political power because of racist non-whites voting in blocks for them after they sufficiently demonstrate their aptitude for self hatred.Tumblr and Twitter are just "safe spaces" for the most stupid and insane among the Democrats, but this kind of thinking permeates all university campuses by way of scum like Tim Wise and Robert Jensen.Why? So you can pretend I didn't come up with any and take some joy out of the fact you wasted minutes of my life?Specifically, who? Quotes and links would be nice.
The newest trend in tumblr and Twitter looney tune land is to claim white women can't be raped because of their "white privilege", and there is a reason why these psychopaths are emboldened.
So, you can't find anyone outside of twitter or tumblr who says minorities can't be racist. Not one prominent person? There has to be someone, right?
One last time, who says minorities can't be racist?
Hidden Racism in 'The Heart of Whiteness'
If society was really serious about considering non-white racism no one would dare utter such nonsense as "racists are dying out", or the often quoted partisan drivel like "not all Republicans are racist, but all racists are Republican".
If non-white racism was actually considered the Democrats and all supposedly left wing, western political parties would be freaking out, because nearly 100% of all registered black racists vote for their party, and all registered Hispanic racists vote for their party, and nearly all Islamic supremacists vote for their party etc.
Without the anti-white vote Democrats would be in some deep shit, and they realize this. How else do you think Democrats could get away with making a personally obituary on dozens of "anti-racist" and "progressive" sites for a racist bitch like Francis Cress Welsing when she poisoned hundreds, if not thousands of minds with her extreme racism against white people?
Dr. Frances C. Welsing, 80, renowned psychiatrist best known for her views on the origins of white racism
"Renowned psychiatrist" my ass.
You're a nut. Most Democrats are white. I can't help it if Republicans have lost virtually all minorities but don't blame Democrats because they are more diverse.
After Hillary there likely never will be a white Democrat presidential nominee ever again.
